Comprehensive, unified framework for analyzing spatial location choice

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2003, 2007, Pages 103-111

  Sivakumar, Aruna ^a   Bhat, Chandra R ^b  

^a RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ECONOMETRIC FRAMEWORK; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; MULTINOMIAL LOGITS; SPATIAL INTERACTION;

DATA REDUCTION;

EID: 38849135525     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2003-13     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Recker, W., and H. Schuler. Destination Choice and Processing Spatial Information: Some Empirical Tests with Alternative Constructs. Economic Geography, Vol. 57, 1981, pp. 373-383.
2. Train, K. Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences over People. Land Economics, Vol. 74, 1998, pp. 230-239.
3. Kemperman, A., A. Borgers, and H. Timmermans. Incorporating Variety Seeking and Seasonality in Stated Preference Modeling of Leisure Trip Destination Choice: Test of External Validity. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1807, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002.
4. Shukla, V., and P. Waddell. Firm Location and Land Use in Discrete Urban Space: A Study of the Spatial Structure of Dallas-Fort Worth. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1991, pp. 225-251.
5. Pellegrini, P. A., and A. S. Fotheringham. Inter-metropolitan Migration and Hierarchical Destination Choice: A Disaggregate Analysis from the US PUMS. Environment and Planning A, Vol.31, 1999, pp. 1093-1118.
6. Pipkin, J. S. The Concept of Choice and Cognitive Explanations of Spatial Behavior. Studies in Choice, Constraints, and Human Spatial Behaviors. Economic Geography, Vol. 57, No. 4, 1981, pp. 315-331.
7. Golledge, R. G., and T. Gärling. Spatial Behavior in Transportation Modeling and Planning. In Transportation Systems Planning: Methods and Applications (K. G. Goulias, ed.), CRC Press, New York, 2003, pp. 3-1-3-22.
8. Burnett, P. Markovian Models of Movement Within Urban Spatial Structures. Geographical Analysis, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1978, pp. 142-153.
9. Birkin, M., and G. P. Clarke. Spatial Interaction in Geography. Geography Review, Vol. 4, 1991, pp. 16-24.
10. Ferguson, M. R., and P. S. Kanaroglou. An Empirical Evaluation of the Aggregated Spatial Choice Model. International Regional Science Review, Vol. 20, 1997, pp. 53-75.
11. Fotheringham, A. S., and C. Brunsdon. Local Forms of Spatial Analysis. Geographical Analysis, Vol. 31, No. 4, 1999, pp. 340-358.
12. LeSage, J. P. Bayesian Estimation of Limited Dependent Variable Spatial Autoregressive Models. Geographical Analysis, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2000, pp. 19-35.
13. Hunt, L. M., B. Boots, and P. S. Kanaroglou. Spatial Choice Modelling: New Opportunities to Incorporate Space into Substitution Patterns. Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 28, No. 6, 2004, pp. 746-766.
14. Dellaert, B. G. C., T. A. Arentze, M. Bierlaire, A. W. J. Borgers, and H. J. P. Timmermans. Investigating Consumers' Tendency to Combine Multiple Shopping Purposes and Destinations. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 35, No. 2, 1998, pp. 177-188.
15. Bhat, C. R., and J. Y. Guo. A Mixed Spatially Correlated Logit Model: Formulation and Application to Residential Choice Modeling. Transportation Research B, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2004, pp. 147-168.
16. Sivakumar, A. Toward a Comprehensive, Unified, Framework for Analyzing Spatial Location Choice for Discretionary Activities. PhD dissertation. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas, Austin, 2005.
17. McFadden, D. Modeling the Choice of Residential Location. In Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models (A. Karlqvist, L. Lundqvist, F. Snickars, and J. Weibull, eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1978, pp. 75-96.
18. Hajivassiliou, V. A., and P. A. Ruud. Classical Estimation Methods for LDV Models Using Simulation. In Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. IV (R. F. Engle and D. L. McFadden, eds.), Elsevier, New York, 1994, pp. 2383-2441.
19. Lee, L-F. On Efficiency of Methods of Simulated Moments and Maximum Simulated Likelihood Estimation of Discrete Choice Models. Econometric Theory, Vol. 8, 1992, pp. 518-552.
20. Sivakumar, A., C. R. Bhat, and G. Ökten. Simulation Estimation of Mixed Discrete Choice Models with the Use of Randomized Quasi-Monte Carlo Sequences: A Comparative Study. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1921, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 112-122.
21. Bhat, C., A. Govindarajan, and V. Pulugurta. Disaggregate Attraction-End Choice Modeling: Formulation and Empirical Analysis. In Transportation Research Record 1645, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 60-68.
22. Schönfelder, S., and K. W. Axhausen. Structure and Innovation of Human Activity Spaces. In Proc., 16th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, ISTTT16, College Park, Md., Oct. 2004.
23. Miller, E. J., and M. E. O'Kelly. Estimating Shopping Destination Choice Models from Travel Diary Data. Professional Geographer, Vol. 35, No. 4, 1983, pp. 440-449.
24. Degeratu, A. M. Estimation Bias in Choice Models with Last Choice Feedback. International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 16, 1999, pp. 285-306.