Effectiveness of interactive online Algebra learning tools

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 67-95

  Cavanaugh, Cathy ^a   Gillan, Kathy Jo ^b   Bosnick, Jan ^c   Hess, Melinda ^d   Scott, Heather ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b Florida Department of Education   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38849104871     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/EC.38.1.d     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Beatty, A. (2005). Mathematical and Scientific Development in Early Childhood: A Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
2. Gage, J. (2001). Using the graphic calculator to form a learning environment for the early teaching of algebra. The International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 9(1).
3. Gamoran, A., & Hannigan, E. (2000). Algebra for everyone? Benefits of college-preparatory mathematics for students with diverse abilities in early secondary school. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(3), 241-254.
4. Gay, D., & Velez, W. (2001). Living graphs. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 7(3), 172.
5. Grassl, R., & Mingus, T. (2002). On the shoulders of technology: Calculators as cognitive amplifiers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 33, 715-723.
6. Gully, L., & Johnston, S. (2004, May 4). Personal communication. Florida Virtual School.
7. Hawkins, E. F., Stancavage, F. B., & Dossey, J. A. (1998). School policies and practices affecting instruction in mathematics (NCES 98-495). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/ pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=98495
8. Jones, K., Price, T., & Story, D. (2004). Online trigonometry flash cards. Mathematics in School, 33(4), 8-12.
9. Meyer, M., Dekker, T., & Querelle, N. (2001). Context in mathematics curricula. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 6, 522.
10. Monk, D. H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13, 125-145.
11. Mullens, J. E., Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (1996). The contribution of training and subject matter knowledge to teaching effectiveness: A multilevel analysis of longitudinal evidence from Belize. Comparative Education Review, 40, 139-157.
12. National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell (Eds.), Mathematics learning study. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
13. Reimer, K., & Moyer, P. (2005). Third-graders learn about fractions using virtual manipulatives: A classroom study. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 24(1), 5-25.
14. Roschelle, J., & DiGiano, C. (2004). ESCOT: Coordinating the influence of R&D and classroom practice to produce educational software from reusable components. Journal of Interactive Learning Environments, 12(1-2).
15. Setzer, J. C., & Lewis, L. (2005). Distance education courses for public elementary and secondary school students: 2002-03. (NCES 2005-010). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National. Center for Education Statistics. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2005/2005010.pdf
16. Smith, R., Clark, T., & Blomeyer, B. (2005). A synthesis of new research on K-12 online learning. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates. http://www.ncrel.org/tech/synthesis/
17. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T.Press.
18. Waxman, H., Lin, M., & Michko, G. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of teaching and learning with technology on student outcomes. Retrieved November 2, 2004 from http://www.ncrel.org/tech/effects2/waxman.pdf
19. Webb, N. (1997). Criteria for Alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education. Madison, WI: National Institute of Science Education (NISE).
20. Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved November 2, 2004 from ftp://ftp.ets.org/pub/res/technolog.pdf