ESCOT: Coordinating the influence of R&D and classroom practice to produce educational software from reusable components

Interactive Learning Environments

Volumn 12, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 73-107

  Roschelle, Jeremy ^a   DiGiano, Chris ^a  

^a SRI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746433479     PISSN: 10494820     EISSN: 17445191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1049482042000300904     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Becker, H., Ravitz, J.L., & Wong, Y. (1999). Teacher and teacher-directed student use of computers and software (3). Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California.
2. Birbilis, G., Koutlis, M., Kyrimis, K., Tsironis, G., & Vasilou, G. (2000, June 4-11, 2000). E-slate: A software architectural style for end-user programming. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Limerick, Ireland.
3. CEO Forum on Education & Technology. (2000). The power of digital learning: Integrating digital content (Year 3 Report). Washington DC: CEO Forum on Education and Technology.
4. DiGiano, C., & Roschelle, J. (2000). Rapid-assembly componentware for education. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Advanced Learning Technologies, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
5. DiGiano, C., Roschelle, J., & Chung, M. (2001). The need for a coordinated engineering discipline for the production of educational software. Paper presented at the 2001 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Madison, WI.
6. DiGiano, C., Roschelle, J., & Chung, M. (in Preparation). The three year evolution of escot component interoperability.
7. diSessa, A. (1997). Open toolsets: New ends and new means in learning mathematics and science with computers. Paper presented at the 21st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education 47-62, Lahti, Finland.
8. diSessa, A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. DOD Software Reuse Initiative Program Management Office. (1995). Software reuse executive primer. Falls Church, VA: DOD Software Reuse Initiative Program Management Office.
10. Donovan, M.S., Bransford, J.D., & Pellegrino, J. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
11. Feiler, J. (1996). Essential opendoc. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
12. Fischer, G. (1987). Cognitive view of reuse and redesign. IEEE Software, 4(4), 60-72.
13. Fisher, G., Redmiles, D., Williams, L., Puhr, G.J., Aoki, A., & Nakakoji, K. (1995). Beyond object-oriented technology: Where current approaches fall short. Human-Computer Interaction, 10(1), 79-119.
14. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1995). Design patterns. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15. Goldenberg, P. (1995). Multiple representations: A vehicle for understanding understandings. In D.N. Perkins, J.L. Schwartz, M.M. West, & M.S. Wiske (Eds.), Software goes to school (pp. 155-171). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16. Hopkins, J. (2000). Component primer. Communications of the ACM, 43(10), 27-30.
17. IEEE Computer. (1997, October). Special issue on object oriented development and reuse. IEEE Computer.
18. Jacobson, I., Griss, M., & Jonsson, P. (1997). Software reuse: Architecture, process, and organization for business success. New York: ACM Press.
19. Kaput, J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. Grouws (Ed.), A handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 515-556). New York: Macmillan.
20. Kozma, R.B., Russell, J., Jones, T., Marx, N., & Davis, J. (1996). The use of multiple, linked representations to facilitate science understanding. In S. Vosniadou, E. De Corte, R. Glaser, & H. Mandl (Eds.), International perspectives on the design of technology-supported learning environments (pp. 41-60). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Laleuf, J.R., & Spalter, A.M. (2001). A component repository for learning objects: A progress report. Paper presented at the ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Roanoke, VA.
22. McIlroy, M.D. (1968). Mass produced software components. In P. Naur & B. Randell (Eds.), Software engineering (pp. 138-155). Garmisch, Germany: NATO Scientific Affairs Division.
23. Myers, W. (1997). Software reuse: Ostriches beware. IEEE Computer, 30(4), 119-120.
24. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
25. Poulin, J.S. (1999). Reuse: Been there, done that. Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 98-100.
26. Reiser, B.J., Spillane, J.P., Steinmuller, F., Sorsa, D., Carney, K., & Kyza, E. (2000). Investigating the mutual adaption process in teacher's design of technology-infused curricula. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI.
27. Reiser, B.J., Spillane, J.P., Steinmuller, F., Sorsa, D., Carney, K., & Kyza, E. (2002). Investigating the mutual adaption process in teachers' design of technology-infused curricula. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI.
28. Repenning, A., Ionannidou, A., Payton, M., Ye, W., & Roschelle, J. (2001). Using components for rapid distributed software deployment. IEEE Software, 18(2), 38-45.
29. Rine, D.C. (1997). Supporting reuse with object technology. IEEE Computer, 30(10), 43-45.
30. Roschelle, J., DiGiano, C., Chung, M., Repenning, A., Tager, S., & Treinen, M. (2000, December). Reusability and interoperability of tools for mathematics learning: Lessons from the escot project. Paper presented at the International ICSC Congress on Intelligent Systems and Applications: Symposium on Interactive and Collaborative Computing, Wollongong, Australia.
31. Roschelle, J., DiGiano, C., Koutlis, M., Repenning, A., Jackiw, N., & Suthers, D. (1999). Developing educational software components. IEEE Computer, 32(9), 5-58.
32. Roschelle, J., Hand, V., & DiGiano, C. (2001). Towards a coherent on-line collection of tools for math learning. Journal of Online Mathematics and its Applications, 1(2).
33. Roschelle, J., Henderson, B., Spohrer, J., & Lilly, J. (1997). Banking on educational software: A wired economy unfolds. Technos, 6(4), 25-28.
34. Roschelle, J., & Jackiw, N. (2000). Technology design as educational research: Interweaving imagination, inquiry & impact. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Research design in mathematics & science education (pp. 777-797). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Roschelle, J., & Kaput, J. (1996). Educational software architecture and systemic impact: The promise of component software. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(3), 217-228.
36. Roschelle, J., Kaput, J., Stroup, W., & Kahn, T. (1998). Scaleable integration of educational software: Exploring the promise of component architectures. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. Retrieved January 8, 2003, from the World Wide Web: http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/98/ 6/
37. Shrader, G., Williams, K., Lachance-Whitcomb, J., Finn, L.-E., & Gomez, L. (2001). Participatory design of science curricula: The case for research for practice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
38. Shumar, W. (2003). The role of community and belonging in online learning: The ESCOT Project at The Math Forum. In M.A. Mardis (Ed.), Developing Digital Libraries for k-12 Education. Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearing house on Information and Technology, pp. 174-187.
39. Spohrer, J., Sumner, T., & Shum, S.B. (1998). Educational authoring tools and the educational object economy: Introduction to this special issue from the east/west group. Journal for Interactive Media in Education, 98(10). www, jime.open.ac.uk/98/10
40. Standish Group International. (1994). The chaos report. Retrieved, from the World Wide Web: http://www.standishgroup.com/sample_research/ chaos_1994_1.php
41. Wattenberg, F. (1998). A national digital library for science, mathematics, engineering, and technology education.