Influence of evoked compound action potential on speech perception in cochlear implant users

Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 439-445

  Guedes, Mariana Cardoso ^a,b,d   Weber, Raimar ^a   Goffi Gomez, Maria Valéria S ^a,c   Neto, Rubens Vuono De Brito ^a,d   Peralta, Cristina Gomes O ^a   Bento, Ricardo Ferreira ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b IRMANDADE DA SANTA CASA DE MISERICÓRDIA DE SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^d Otorhinolaryngology Department ^*  (Brazil)

Author keywords

Action potentials; Auditory evoked potentials; Auditory pathways; Cochlear nerve; Ochlear implants; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANOXIA; ARTICLE; CHILD; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED RESPONSE; GENETICS; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; INFECTION; INJURY; INNER EAR MALFORMATION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENIERE DISEASE; MENINGITIS; OTOSCLEROSIS; OTOTOXICITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TELEMETRY; USHER SYNDROME; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; IMPLANTATION; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; DEAFNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 38749125192     PISSN: 18088694     EISSN: 18088686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30095-1     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bento RF, Brito Neto RV, Castilho AM, Gomez MVSG, Giorgi SB, Guedes MC. Resultados auditivos com o implante coclear multicanal em pacientes submetidos a cirurgia no Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 2004;70(5):632-7.
2. Gordon KA, Gilden JE, Ebinger KA, Shapiro WH. Neural Response Telemetry in 12- to 24-Month-Old Children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 2002;111(189):42-8.
3. Ferrari DV. A telemetria de respostas neurais para registrar o potencial de ação composto eletricamente evocado do nervo coclear em crianças usuárias de implante coclear multicanal. 2003. 204p. Tese (Doutorado em Psicologia) - Instituto de Psicologia. Neurociências e Comportamento. Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.
4. Thai-Van H, Truy E, Charasse B, Boutitie F, Chanal JM, Cochard N, et al. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting. Clinical Neurophysiology 2004;115:2811-24.
5. Guedes MC et al. Medidas de Telemetria de Resposta Neural em Usuários de Implante Coclear Multicanal. Arq Otorrinolaringol 2003;7(3):197-204.
6. Gordon K, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. Programming cochlear implant stimulation levels in infants and children with a combination of objective measures. Int J Audiol 2004;43:528-32.
7. Cafarelli-Dees D et al. Normative findings of electrically evoked action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system. Audiol Neurootol 2005;10:105-16.
8. Guedes MC et al. Telemetria de resposta neural intra-operatória em usuários de implante coclear. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2005; 71(5): 660-7.
9. Dillier N, Lai WK, Almqvist B, Frohne C, Müller-Deile J, Stecker M, Von Wallenberg E. Measurement of the electrically evoked compound action potential via a neural response telemetry system. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (Suppl 189) 2002;111(5pt 1):407-14.
10. Hughes ML Brown CJ Abbas PJ Gantz BJ. Using electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds to facilitate creating MAPs for children with the Nucleus CI 24M. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 2000;57:260-5.
11. Seyle K, Brown CJ. Speech Perception Using Maps Based on Neural Response Telemetry Measures. Ear Hear 2002;23(1Suppl):72S-9S.
12. Smoorenburg GF, Willeboer C, Van Dijk JE. Speech Perception in Nucleus CI24M Cochlear Implant Users with Processor Settings Based on Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Thresholds. Audiol Neurootol 2002;7:335-47.
13. Bown CJ, Hughes ML, Luk B, Abbas PJ, Wolaver AA, Gervais JP. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus CI24M speech processor: Data from adults. Ear Hear 2000;21:151-63.
14. Novy S, Cheshire I Using intra-operative NRTTM (Neural Response Telemery) to set initial MAP parameters with the Nucleus® 24 and Nucleus® 24k cochlear implant systems. Nucleus Report 2002 May / June. Cochlear Co.
15. Abbas PJ, Brown CJ, Shallop JK, Firszt JB, Hughes ML, Hong SH, Stallen SJ. Summary of Results Using the Nucleus CI24M Implant to Record the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential. Ear Hear 1999;20(1):45-9.
16. Plant K, Law M, Whitford L, Knight M, Tari S, Leigh J et al. Evaluation of streamlined programming procedures for Nucleus cochlear implant with the contour electrode array. Ear Hear 2005;26:651-68.
17. James CJ, Blamey PJ, Martin L, Swansom B, Just Y, Macfarlane D. Adaptative dynamic range optimization for cochlear implants: preliminary study. Ear Hear 2002;23(1 Suppl):49S-58S.
18. Gomez MVSG, Guedes MC, Sant'Anna SBG, Peralta CGO, Tsuji RK, Castilho AM et al. Critérios de seleção e avaliação médica e audiológica dos candidates ao implante coclear: Protocolo HCFMUSP. Arq Otorrinolaringol 2004;7(3):197-204.
19. Bevilacqua MC, Tech EA. Elaboração de um procedimento de avaliação de percepção de fala em crianças deficientes auditivas profundas a partir de cinco anos de idade. In: Marchesan, I.Q, Zorzi, J.L, Gomes, I.C.D. São Paulo: Lovise; 1996. cap. 27: p. 411-33.
20. Orlandi ACL, Bevilacqua MC. Deficiência auditiva profunda nos primeiros anos de vida: procedimento para a avaliação da percepção de fala. Pró-Fono 1998;10(2):87-91.
21. Lopes AC, Castiquini EAT, Delgado EMC, Bevilacqua MC. Procedimentos de avaliação da percepção de fala em deficientes auditivos. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 2000;4(6):24-7.
22. Geers AE. Techniques for assessing auditory speech perception and lipreading enhancement in young deaf children. In: Geers, AE, Moog JS. Volta Review 1994;96:85-96.
23. Costa MJ, Iorio MCM, Mangabeira-Albernaz PL. Desenvolvimento de um teste para avaliar a habilidade de reconhecer a fala no silêncio e no ruído. Pró-Fono 2000;12(2):9-16.
24. Kiefer J, Von Ilberg C, Rupprecht V, Hubner-Egner J, Knecht R. Optimized Speech Understanding with the Continuous Interleaved Sampling Speech Coding Strategy in Patients with Cochlear Implants: effect of variations in stimulation rate and number of channels. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000;109(11):1009-20.
25. Franck KH, Norton SJ. Estimation of Psychophysical Levels Using the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Measured with the Neural Response Telemetry. Capabilities of Cochlear Corporation's CI24M Device. Ear Hear 2001;22(4):289-99.
26. Gantz BJ, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ. Intraoperative Measurements of Electrically Evoked Auditory Nerve Compound Action Potential. Am J Otol 1994;15(2):137-44.
27. Blamey P, Arndt P, Bergeron F, Bredberg G, Brimacombe J, Facer G, et al. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 1996;1(5):293-306.
28. Nadol JB Jr, Young YS, Glynn RJ. Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: implications for cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989;98:411-6.
29. Wellman MB, Sommer DD, McKenna J. Sensorineural hearing loss in postmeningitic children. Otol Neurotol 2003;24(6):907-12.
30. Lehnhardt E, Aschendorff A. Prognostics factors in 187 adults provided with the Nucleus cochlear mini-system 22. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 1993;48:146-52.
31. Bevilacqua MC, Moret ALM, Costa Filho OA, Nascimento LT, Banhara MR. Implantes coleares em crianças portadoras de deficiência auditiva decorrente de meningite. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 2003;69(6):760-4.
32. El-Kashlan HK, Ashbaugh C, Zwolan T, Telian AS. Cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf children in ossified cochleae. Otol Neurotol 2003;24(4):596-600.