A RESPONSE TO GRÜNBAUM'S REFUTATION OF PSYCHOANALYSIS

Psychoanalytic Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 539-544

  Mills, Jon ^a  

^a TRENT UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

category mistake; causality; Gr nbaum; science

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY; EGO DEVELOPMENT; EPISTEMOLOGY; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY; VALIDITY;

EID: 34548860416     PISSN: 07369735     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0736-9735.24.3.539     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Bowman M. The last resistance: The concept of science as a defense against psychoanalysis (2002), SUNY Press, Albany, NY
2. Feyman R.P. Six easy pieces (1995), Addison Wesley Publishing Co, Reading, MA
3. Freud, S. (1961). The Ego and the Id. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 19), J. Strachey (Trans. & Ed.) in collaboration with Anna Freud, assisted by Alix Strachey and Alan Tyson. London: Hogarth Press (Original work published 1923).
4. Grünbaum A. Is Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic edifice relevant to the 21st Century?. Psychoanalytic Psychology 23 (2006) 257-284
5. Verhaeghe P. On being normal and other disorders (2004), Other Press, New York