Correlation between full-field and multifocal VEPs in optic neuritis

Documenta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 116, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 19-27

  Klistorner, Alexander ^a   Fraser, Clare ^a   Garrick, Raymond ^a   Graham, Stuart ^a   Arvind, Hemamalini ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Full field VEP; Multi focal VEP; Optic neuritis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTRODE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; FULL FIELD EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MULTIFOCAL EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; OPTIC NEURITIS;

ADULT; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NERVE FIBERS; OPTIC NEURITIS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 38649108467     PISSN: 00124486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-007-9072-y     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ghezzi A, Martinelli V, Torri V et al (1999) Long-term follow-up of isolated optic neuritis: The risk of developing multiple sclerosis, its outcome, and the prognostic role of paraclinical tests. J Neurol 246:770-775
2. Rodriguez M, Siva A, Cross SA et al (1995) Optic neuritis: A population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Neurology 45:244-250
3. Youl BD, Turano G, Miller DH et al (1991) The pathophysiology of acute optic neuritis. An association of gadolinium leakage with clinical and electrophysiological deficits. Brain 114:2437-2450
4. Halliday AM, McDonald WI, Mushin J (1972) Delayed visual evoked responsein optic neuritis. Lancet i:982-985
5. Ebers GC (1985) Optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 42:702-704
6. Jones SJ, Brusa A (2003) Neurophysiological evidence for long-term repair of MS lesions: Implications for axon protection. J Neurol Sci 206:193-198
7. Daniel P, Whittridge D (1961) The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys. J Physiol 159:203-221
8. Riggs LA, Wooten BR (1972) Electrical measures and psychophysical data on human vision. In: Jamison D, Hurvich LM (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol 7/4. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 690-731
9. MacKay DM, Jeffreys DA (1973) Visual evoked potentials and visual perception in man. In: Jung R (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol 11. Springer, Berlin, pp 647-656
10. Spekreijse H, van der Tweel LH, Zuidma T (1973) Contrast evoked response in man. Vision Res 35:153-163
11. ONTT Group (1991) The clinical profile of optic neuritis: Experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial. Arch Ophthalmol 109:1673-1678
12. Halliday AM, Darbett G, Blumhardt LD, Kriss A (1979) The macular and submacular subcomponents of the attern evoked response. In: Lehman D, Callaway E (eds) Human evoked potentials. Plenum Publishing, New York, pp 135-151
13. Hammond SR, MacCallum S, Yiannikas C et al (1987) Variability on serial testing of pattern reversal visual evoked potential latencies from full-field, half-field and foveal stimulation in control subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 66:401-408
14. Baseler HA, Sutter EE, Klein SA, Carney T (1994) The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 90:65-81
15. Klistorner AI, Graham SL, Grigg JR, Billson FA (1998) Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: Improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:937-950
16. Hood DC, Ohri N, Bo Yang E et al (2005) Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials: A monocular analysis. Doc Ophthalmol 109:189-199
17. Graham SL, Klistorner A, Goldberg I (2005) Clinical application of objective perimetry using multifocal VEP in Glaucoma practice. Arch Ophthalmol 123:729-739
18. Hood DC, Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC et al (2004) Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: A comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:492-498
19. Fraser C, Klistorner A, Graham SL et al (2006) Multifocal visual evoked potential analysis of inflammatory or demyelinating optic neuritis. Ophthalmol 107:2283-2299
20. Fraser C, Klistorner A, Graham SL et al (2006) Multifocal visual evoked potential latency analysis: Predicting progression to multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 43:847-850
21. Barber C (1998) The multifocal ERG and VEP. In: Stalberg E, de Weerd A, Zidar J (eds) Proc North Eur Congr Clin Neurophysiol, Bologna, pp 209-216
22. Barber C, Wen Y (2000) The multi-focal visual evoked potential can be used to dissect the standard VEP[ARVO abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:S334
23. Fortune B, Hood DC (2003) Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:1367-1375
24. Graham SL, Klistorner AI, Grigg JR, Billson FA (2000) Objective VEP perimetry in glaucoma: Asymmetry analysis to identify early deficits. J Glaucoma 9:10-19
25. Klistorner A, Graham SL (2001) Electroencephalogram-based scaling of multifocal visual evoked potentials: Effect on intersubject amplitude variability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:2145-2152
26. Goldberg I, Graham SL, Klistorner A (2002) Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 133:29-39
27. Graham SL, Klistorner A (1999) The diagnostic significance of the multifocal pattern visual evoked potential in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 10:140-146
28. Harding GF, Odom JV, Spileers W, Spekreije H (1996) Standard for visual evoked potentials 1995. Vision Res 36:3567-3572
29. Steinmetz H, Gunter F, Bernd-Ulrich M (1989) Craniocerebral topography within the international 10-20 system. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 72:499-506
30. Stensaas SS, Eddington DK, Dobelle WH (1974) The topography and variability of the primary visual cortex in man. J Neurosurg 40:747-755
31. Hood DC, Zhang X (2000) Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: Comparing disease-related changes. Doc Ophthalmol 100:115-137
32. Basar E, Rahn E, Demiralp T, Schurmann M (1998) Spontaneous EEG theta activity controls frontal visual evoked potential amplitudes. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 108:101-109
33. Brandt ME, Jansen BH (1991) The relationship between prestimulus-alpha amplitude and visual evoked potential amplitude. Int J Neurosci 61:261-268
34. Rahn E, Basar E (1993) Enhancement of visual evoked potentials by stimulation during low prestimulus EEG stages. Int J Neurosci 72:123-136
35. Klistorner A, Graham SL (2006) Intertest variability of mfVEP amplitude: reducing its effect on the interpretation of sequential tests. Doc Ophthalmol 111:159-167
36. Tusa RM, Palmer LA, Rosenquist AC (1978) The retinotopic organization of area 17 (striate cortex) in th ecat. J Comp Neurol 177:213-236
37. Harter MR (1970) Evoked cortical responses to checkerboard patterns: effect of check-size as a function of retinal eccentricity. Vision Res 10:1365-1376
38. Meredith JT, Celesia GG (1982) Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials and retinal eccentricity. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 53:243-253
39. Yiannikas C, Walsh JC (1983) The variation of the pattern shift visual evoked response with the size of the stimulus field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 55:427-435
40. Lesevre N, Joseph JP (1979) Modification of the pattern evoked potential in relation to the stimulated part of the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 47:183-203
41. Balachandran C, Klistorner A, Graham SL (2003) Effect of stimulus check size on multifocal visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 106:183-188
42. Ristanovic D, Hajdukovic R (1981) Effects of spatially structured stimulus fields on pattern reversal visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 51:599-610