The diagnostic significance of the multifocal pattern visual evoked potential in glaucoma

Current Opinion in Ophthalmology

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 140-146

  Graham, Stuart L ^a   Klistorner, Alexander ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTRORETINOGRAM; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE FIXATION; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PERIMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0032806735     PISSN: 10408738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00055735-199904000-00011     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. 1 Leydhecker G: The electroretinogram in glaucomatous eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 1950, 34:550-554.
2. 2 Henkes HE: Electroretinography: an evaluation of the influence of the retinal and general metabolic condition on the electrical responses of the retina. Am J Ophthalmol 1957, 43:67-81.
3. 3 Francois J: L'electroretinographie dans le glaucome. Acta Ophthalmol 1953, 31:205-218.
4. 4 Schmoger E, Zimmer W: Das Elektroretinogramm bei primarem Glaukom. Klin Monatsbl Augenheildk 1965, 146:122-123.
5. 5 Uji Y, Yokoyama M: Blue-cone response in glaucomatous eyes studied with electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1982, 31:103.
6. 6 Graham SL, Drance SM, Chauhan BC, et al.: Comparison of psychophysical and electrophysiological testing in early glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996, 37:2651-2662.
7. 7 Fazio DT, Heckenlively JR, Martin DA, Christensen RE: The electroretinogram in advanced open angle glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 1986, 63:45-54.
8. 8 Holder GE: Significance of abnormal pattern electroretinography in anterior visual pathway dysfunction. Br J Ophthalmol 1987, 71:166-171.
9. 9 Korth M, Horn F, Storck B, Jonas J: The pattern-evoked electroretinogram (PERG): age-related alterations and changes in glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1989, 227:123-130.
10. 10 Weinstein G, Arden G, Hitchings R, et al.: The pattern electroretinogram in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1988, 106:923-928.
11. 11 O'Donaghue E, Arden GB, O'Sullivan F, et al.: The pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 1992, 76:387-394.
12. 12 Wanger P, Persson HE: Pattern-reversal electroretinograms and high-pass resolution perimetry in suspected or early glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1987, 94:1098-1103.
13. 13 Trick G: Pattern reversal retinal potentials in ocular hypertensives at high and low risk of developing glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 1987, 65:79-85.
14. 14 Pfeiffer N, Tillmon B, Bach M: Predictive value of the pattern electroretinogram in high-risk ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993, 34:1710-1715.
15. 15 Bach M, Hiss P, Rover J: Check-size specific changes of pattern electroretinogram in patients with early open-angle glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 1988, 69:315-322.
16. 16 Van den Berg TJTP, Riemslag FCC, de Vos GWGA, Verduyn Lunel HFE: Pattern ERG and glaucomatous visual field defects. Doc Ophthalmol 1986, 61:335-341.
17. 17 Ruben ST, Hitchings RA, Fitzke F, Arden GB: Electrophysiology and psychophysics in ocular hypertension and glaucoma: evidence for different pathomechanisms in early glaucoma. Eye 1994, 8:516-520.
18. 18 Neoh C, Kaye SB, Brown M, Ansons AM, Wishart P: Pattern electroretinogram and automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 1994, 78:359-362.
19. 19 Watanabe I, Iijima H, Tsukahara S: The pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma: an evaluation by relative amplitude from the Bjerrum area. Br J Ophthalmol 1989, 73:131-135.
20. 20 Graham SL, Wong VA, Drance SM, Mikelberg FS: Pattern electroretinograms from hemifields in normal and glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994, 35:3347-3356.
21. 21 Sokol S, Domar A, Moskovitz A, Schwarz B: Pattern evoked potential latency and contrast sensitivity in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1981, 27:79-86.
22. 22 Towle VL, Moskovitz A, Sokol S, Schwartz B: The visual evoked potential in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: effects of check size, field size, and stimulation rate. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1983, 26:175-183.
23. 23 Mitchell KW: The visual evoked potential in the differential diagnosis of ocular hypertension and chronic simple glaucoma. University of Newcastle upon Tyne, PhD thesis, 1987.
24. 24 Howe JW, Mitchell KW: Visual evoked potential changes in chronic glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Doc Ophthalmol Soc UK 1986, 105:457-462.
25. 25 Bray LC, Mitchell KW, Howe JW: Prognostic significance of the pattern visual evoked potential in ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 1991, 75:79-83.
26. 26 Howe JW, Mitchell KW: Visual evoked potentials from quadrantic field stimulation in the investigation of homonymous field defects. In Evoked Potentials. Edited by Barber C. Lancaster: MTP Press; 1980:279-283.
27. 27 Gazarek S, Henning G, Muller W: Experimental studies of locally generated focal VECP within the 30 degree visual field with LED. Ophthalmologe 1995, 92:113-119.
28. 28 Cappin JM, Nissim S: Visual evoked responses in the assessment of field defects in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1975, 93:9-18.
29. 29 Schlykowa L, van Dijk BW, Ehrenstein WH: Motion-onset visual-evoked potentials as a function of retinal eccentricity in man. Brain Res 1993, 1:169-174.
30. 30 Brusa A, Mortimer C, Jones SJ: Clinical evaluation of VEPs to interleaved checkboard reversal stimulation of central, hemi-and peripheral fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995, 96:485-494.
31. 31 Bradham MS, Montgomery DM, Evans AL, et al.: Objective detection of hemifield and quadrantic field defects by visual evoked cortical potential. Br J Ophthalmol 1996, 80:297-303.
32. 32 Lesevre N: Chronotopographical analysis of the human evoked potentials in relation to the visual field. In Evoked Potentials. Edited by Bodis-Wollner I. New York: New York Academy of Science; 1982:156-182.
33. 33 Katsumi O, Tetsuka S, Mehta M, Tetsuka H, Hirose T: Effect of hemifield stimulation on simultaneous steady-state pattern reversal electroretinogram and visual evoked response. Ophthalmic Res 1993, 25:119-127.
34. 34 Groneberg A: Simultan registrierte retinale und kortikale elektrische Antworten auf Kontrastreize. Berl Dtsch Ophthalmol Ges 1979, 76:453-458.
35. 35 Lehman D, Skrandies W: Multi-channel evoked potential fields show different properties of human upper and lower hemiretina systems. Exp Brain Res 1979, 35:151-159.
36. 36 Sutter EE, Tran D: The field topography of ERG components in man: 1: the photopic luminance response. Vision Res 1992, 32:433-446.
37. 37 Baseler HA, Sutter EE, Klein SA, Carney T: The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994, 90:65-81.
38. 38 Victor JD: Nonlinear systems analysis in vision: overview of kernel methods. In Nonlinear Vision: Determination of Neural Receptive Fields, Functions and Networks. Edited by Pinter RB, Nabet B. Cleveland, OH: CRC Press; 1992:1-37.
39. 39 Vaegan, Buckland L: The spatial distribution of ERG losses across the posterior pole of glaucomatous eyes in multifocal recordings. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1996, 24(suppl):28-31.
40. 40 Klistorner A: Temporal non-linear analysis of human retinal and cortical visual evoked potentials: relation to parallel processing [PhD thesis]. University of New South Wales, 1997.
41. 41 Hetherington APB, Arden GB, Wolf JE: Comparison of perimeter testing and multifocal ERGs in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997, 38:s568.
42. 42 Abe H, Hasegawa S, Oshima A, Takagi M, Takada R: Multifocal ERG in patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998, 39:S494.
43. 43 Abe H, Hasegawa S, Iwata K: Contrast sensitivity and VEP in patients with glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 1987, 65:65-70.
44. 44 Baseler HA, Sutter EE: M and P components of the VEP and their visual field contribution. Vision Res 1997, 37:675-790. Introduced the concept of multifocal VEP recording with cortically-scaled stimulus.
45. 45 Fox PT, Miezin FM, Allman JM, van Essen DC, Raichle ME: Retinotopic organisation of human visual cortex mapped with positron-emission tomography. J Neurosci 1987, 7:913-922.
46. 46 Horton JC, Hoyt F: The representation of the visual field in the human striate cortex. Arch Ophthalmol 1991, 109:816-824.
47. 47 Cowey A, Polls ET: Human cortical magnification factor and its relation to visual acuity. Brain Res 1974, 21:447-454.
48. 48 Ravamo L, Virsu V: An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor. Exp Brain Res 1979, 37:495-510.
49. 49 Jedinak A, Skrandies W: Functional perimetry combined with topographical VEP analysis. Int J Neurosci 1998, 21:117-132.
50. 50 Graham SL, Klistorner AI: Electrophysiology: a review of signal origins and applications to investigating glaucoma. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1998, 26:71-85.
51. 51 Klistorner AI, Graham SL, Grigg JR, Billson FA: Electrode position and multi-focal VEP: role in objective visual field assessment. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1998, 26:S91-S94. Discusses the effect of varying electrode position in multifocal VEP recording.
52. 52 Klistorner AI, Graham SL, Grigg JR, Billson FA: Multifocal topographic VEP: improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998, 39:937-950. Presents first examples of detecting glaucomatous field defects using the multifocal VEP. Confirms potential for objective perimetry.
53. 53 Sutter EE: A deterministic approach to non-linear systems analysis. In Non-linear Vision: Determination of Neural Receptive Fields, Functions and Networks. Edited by Pinter RB, Nabet B. Cleveland, OH: CRC Press; 1992:171-220.
54. 54 Ohde H, Kimura I, Betsuin Y, et al.: The retinotopic response of visual evoked potentials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997, 38:4602.
55. 55 Kawabata H, Yotukura J, Adachi-Usami E: Sensitive mapping of the scotopic visually evoked cortical potential. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997, 38:4600.
56. 56 Kitano M, Niiyama K, Kasamatsu T, Sutter EE, Norcia AM: Retinotopic and nonretinotopic field potentials in cat visual cortex. Vis Neurosci 1994, 11:953-977.
57. 57 Odom JV: Kernel analysis. In Principles and Practice of Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. Edited by Heckenlively JR and Arden GB, Mosby-Yearbook; 1991:254-259.
58. 58 Graham SL, Klistorner AI, Grigg JR, Billson FA: Multifocal pattern VEP: objective detection of visual field defects in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998, 39:S494.
59. 59 Aine CJ, Supek S, George JS, et al.: Retinotopic organisation of human visual cortex: departures from the classical model. Cereb Cortex 1996, 6:354-361.
60. 60 Gray LG, Galetta SL, Siegal T, Schartz NJ: The central visual field in homonymous hemianopia: evidence for unilateral foveal representation. Arch Neurol 1997, 54:312-317.