Accounting for Occurrences: A New View of the Use of Contingency Information in Causal Judgment

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 204-218

  White, Peter A ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

causal judgment; contingency information; overshadowing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HUMAN; LEARNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CAUSALITY; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PROBABILITY LEARNING; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 38649107086     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.204     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aitken M.R.F., Larkin M.J.W., and Dickinson A. Super-learning of causal judgments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 B (2000) 59-81
2. Allan L.G. Human contingency judgments: Rule based or associative?. Psychological Bulletin 114 (1993) 435-448
3. Anderson J.R., and Sheu C.-F. Causal inferences as perceptual judgments. Memory and Cognition 23 (1995) 510-524
4. Baker A.G., Mercier P., Vallée-Tourangeau F., Frank R., and Pan M. Selective associations and causality judgments: The presence of a strong causal factor may reduce judgments of a weaker one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19 (1993) 414-432
5. Baker A.G., Vallée-Tourangeau F., and Murphy R.A. Asymptotic judgment of cause in a relative validity paradigm. Memory and Cognition 28 (2000) 466-479
6. Chapman G.B., and Robbins S.J. Cue interaction in human contingency judgment. Memory and Cognition 18 (1990) 537-545
7. Cheng P.W. From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review 104 (1997) 367-405
8. De Houwer J., and Beckers T. Higher-order retrospective revaluation in human causal learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 B (2002) 137-151
9. De Houwer J., and Beckers T. A review of recent developments in research and theories on human contingency learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 B (2002) 289-310
10. Dickinson A., Shanks D.R., and Evenden J.L. Judgment of act-outcome contingency: The role of selective attribution. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 36 A (1984) 29-50
11. Goedert K.M., and Spellman B.A. Nonnormative discounting: There is more to cue interaction effects than controlling for alternative causes. Learning and Behavior 33 (2005) 197-210
12. Griffiths T.L., and Tenenbaum J.B. Structure and strength in causal induction. Cognitive Psychology 51 (2005) 334-384
13. Jenkins H.M., and Ward W.C. Judgment of contingency between responses and outcomes. Psychological Monographs 79 10 (1965)
14. Kao S.-F., and Wasserman E.A. Assessment of an information integration account of contingency judgment with examination of subjective cell importance and method of information presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19 (1993) 1363-1386
15. Levin I.P., Wasserman E.A., and Kao S.F. Multiple methods for examining biased information use in contingency judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 55 (1993) 228-250
16. Lober K., and Shanks D.R. Is causal induction based on causal power? Critique of Cheng (1997). Psychological Review 107 (2000) 195-212
17. Mandel D.R., and Lehman D.R. Integration of contingency information in judgments of cause, covariation, and probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 127 (1998) 269-285
18. McKenzie C.R.M. The accuracy of intuitive judgment strategies: Covariation assessment and Bayesian inference. Cognitive Psychology 26 (1994) 209-239
19. McKenzie C.R.M., and Mikkelson L.A. A Bayesian view of covariation assessment. Cognitive Psychology 54 (2007) 33-61
20. Medin D.L., and Edelson S.M. Problem structure and the use of base-rate information from experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117 (1988) 68-85
21. Mercier P., and Parr W. Inter-trial interval, stimulus duration and number of trials in contingency judgments. British Journal of Psychology 87 (1996) 549-566
22. Novick L.R., and Cheng P.M. Assessing interactive causal influence. Psychological Review 111 (2004) 455-485
23. Price P.C., and Yates J.F. Judgmental overshadowing: Further evidence of cue interaction in contingency judgment. Memory and Cognition 21 (1993) 561-572
24. Rescorla R.A., and Wagner A.R. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations on the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In: Black A.H., and Prokasy W.F. (Eds). Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (1972), Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York 64-99
25. Shanks D.R. Continuous monitoring of human contingency judgment across trials. Memory and Cognition 13 (1985) 158-167
26. Shanks D.R. Acquisition functions in contingency judgment. Learning and Motivation 18 (1987) 147-166
27. Shanks D.R. The psychology of associative learning (1995), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
28. Shanks D.R., Lopez F.J., Darby R.J., and Dickinson A. Distinguishing associative and probabilistic contrast theories of human contingency judgment. In: Shanks D.R., Holyoak K.J., and Medin D.L. (Eds). The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 34. Causal learning (1996), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 265-311
29. Spellman B.A. Acting as intuitive scientists: Contingency judgments are made while controlling for alternative potential causes. Psychological Science 7 (1996) 337-342
30. Spellman B.A. Conditionalizing causality. In: Shanks D.R., Holyoak K.J., and Medin D.L. (Eds). The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 34. Causal learning (1996), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 167-206
31. Spellman B.A., Price C.M., and Logan J.M. How two causes are different from one: The use of (un)conditional information in Simpson's paradox. Memory and Cognition 29 (2001) 193-208
32. Tangen J.M., and Allan L.G. The relative effect of cue interaction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 56 B (2003) 279-300
33. Waldmann M.R. Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26 (2000) 53-76
34. Waldmann M.R., and Holyoak K.J. Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: Asymmetries in cue competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 121 (1992) 222-236
35. Ward W.C., and Jenkins H.M. The display of information and the judgment of contingency. Canadian Journal of Psychology 19 (1965) 231-241
36. Wasserman E.A., Dorner W.W., and Kao S.-F. Contributions of specific cell information to judgments of interevent contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16 (1990) 509-521
37. Wasserman E.A., Kao S.-F., Van Hamme L.J., Katagiri M., and Young M.E. Causation and association. In: Shanks D.R., Holyoak K.J., and Medin D.L. (Eds). The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 34. Causal learning (1996), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 207-264
38. White P.A. Causal judgment from contingency information: Relation between subjective reports and individual tendencies in judgment. Memory and Cognition 28 (2000) 415-426
39. White P.A. Effects of wording and stimulus format on the use of contingency information in causal judgment. Memory and Cognition 31 (2003) 231-242
40. White P.A. Making causal judgments from contingency information: The pCI rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29 (2003) 710-727
41. White P.A. Judgment of two causal candidates from contingency information: Effects of relative prevalence of the two causes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 A (2004) 961-991
42. White P.A. Judgment of two causal candidates from contingency information: II. Effects of information about one cause on judgments of the other cause. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 A (2005) 999-1021