Reaction times as a measure of uncertainty

Psicothema

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 43-48

  Bonnet, Claude ^a   Ars, Jordi Fauquet ^b   Ferrer, Santiago Estaún ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

ATTITUDE; HUMANS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SOCIAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 38549165185     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bonnet, C., & Dresp, B. (2001). Reaction time studies of sensory magnitude and perceptual processing. Psychologica, 28, 63-86.
2. Bonnet, C., & Link, S. (1998). Analyzing individual differences in Reaction Times. In Gondrin, S. & Lacouture, Y. (Eds.): Fechner Day 98 (pp. 161-166). Québec: International Society of Psychophysics.
3. Bonnet, C., Paulos, C., & Nithart, C. (2005). Visual representations of dynamic actions from static pictures. Perception, 34, 835-846.
4. Bonnet, C., Zamora, M.C., Buratti, P., & Guirao, M. (1999). Group and individual gustatory reaction times and Piéron's law. Physiology and Behavior, 66, 549-558.
5. Heathcote, A. (1998). Neuromorphic models of reaction time. Australian Journal of Psychology, 50, 157-164.
6. Hsu, Y. (2005). A generalization of Piéron's law to include background intensity and latency distribution. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 49, 450-463.
7. Kellogg, W.N. (1931). The time of judgment in psychometric measures. American Journal of Psychology, 43, 65-86.
8. Laming, D.R.J. (1968). Information theory of choice reaction times. New York: Academic Press.
9. Link, S.W. (1975). The relative judgement theory of two-choice response time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 12, 114-135.
10. Link S. (1978). The relative judgement theory of the psychometric function, In Requin, J. (Ed.): Attention and Performance VII (pp. 619-630). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
11. Link, S. (1992). The wave theory of difference and similarity. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
12. Link, S., & Bonnet, C. (1998). Wave theory and reaction time. In Gondrin. S. & Lacouture, Y. (Eds.): Fechner Day 98 (pp. 155-160). Québec: International Society of Psychophysics.
13. Link, S.W., & Heath, R.A. (1975). A sequential theory of psychological judgement. Psychometrika, 40, 77-105.
14. Luce, R.D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Maiche, A., Fauquet, J., Estaún, S., & Bonnet. C. (2004). Tiempo de reacción: del cronoscopio a la teoría de ondas. Psicothema, 16, 149-155.
16. Marcos, J.L., & Redondo, J. (2005). Facilitation and interference of the automatic information processing on a reaction time task to threat-relevant stimuli. Psicothema, 17, 332-337.
17. McMillen, T., & Holmes, P. (2006). The dynamics of choice among multiple alternatives. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50, 30-57.
18. Osman, A., Lou, L., Muller-Gethman, H., Rinkenauer, G., Mattes, G., & Ullrich, R. (2000). Mechanisms speed-accuracy tradeoff: Evidence from covert motor processes. Biological Psychology, 51, 173-199.
19. Palmer, J., Huk, A.C., & Shadlen, M.N. (2005). The effect of stimulus on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision. Journal of Vision, 5, 376-404.
20. Piéron, H. (1914). Recherches sur les lois de variation des temps de latence sensorielle en fonction des intensités excitatrices, L'Année Psychologique, 20, 17-96.
21. Piéron, H. (1920). Nouvelles recherches sur l'analyse du temps de latence sensorielle en fonction des intensités excitatrices. L'Année Psychologique, 22, 58-142.
22. Piéron, H. (1952). The sensations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23. Pins D., & Bonnet C (1996). On the relation between stimulus intensity and processing time: Piéron's law and Choice Reaction Time. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 390-400.
24. Pins, D., & Bonnet, C. (2000). The Piéron function in the threshold region. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 127-136.
25. Ratcliff, R1, & Smith, P.L. (2004). A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 111, 333-367.
26. Rinberg, D., Koulakov, A., & Gelperin, A. (2006). Speed-accuracy trade-off in olfaction. Neuron, 51, 351-358.
27. Smith, P.L. (1994). Fechner's legacy and challenge. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38, 407-420.
28. Smith, P.L. (2000). Stochastic dynamic models of response time and accuracy: A foundational primer. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 408-463.
29. Smith, P.L., & Ratcliff, R. (2004). Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends in Neurosciences, 27, 161-168.
30. Stafford, T., & Gurney, K.N. (2005). The role of response mechanisms in determining reaction time performance: Pieron's Law revisited. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 975-987.
31. Stone, M. (1960). Models for choice reaction time. Psychometrika, 25, 251-260.
32. Usher, M., Olami, Z., & McCleland, J.L. (2002). Hick's law in a stochastic race model with speed-accuracy tradeoff, Journal of Mathematical Psyhology, 46, 704-715.