State-specific key variables for monitoring multi-state processes

Chemical Engineering Research and Design

Volumn 85, Issue 12 A, 2007, Pages 1630-1644

  Srinivasan, R ^a,b   Qian, M S ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Data mining; Diagnosis; Fault detection; FCC; Principal components

Indexed keywords

CATALYTIC CRACKING; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DATA MINING; DIFFERENTIATION (CALCULUS); LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; MONITORING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

FLUIDIZED CATALYTIC CRACKING UNIT; MULTI-STATE PROCESS; STATE-PROGRESSION;

CHEMICAL PLANTS;

CATALYTIC CRACKING; CHEMICAL PLANTS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DATA MINING; DIFFERENTIATION (CALCULUS); LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; MONITORING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 38549106577     PISSN: 02638762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0263-8762(07)73207-0     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Al-Kandari, N.M. and Jolliffe, I.T., 2001, Variable selection and interpretation of covariance principal components, Communications in Statistics Part B: Simulation and Computation, 30(2): 339-354.
2. Al-Kandari, N.M. and Jolliffe, I.T., 2005, Variable selection and interpretation in correlation principal components, Environmetrics, 16: 659-672.
3. Arbel, A., Rinard, I.H. and Shinnar, R., 1996, Dynamic and control of fluidized catalytic crackers. 3. Designing the control system: choice of manipulated and measured variables for partial control, Ind Eng Chem Res, 35(7): 2215-2233.
4. Bagajewicz, M.J., 1997, Design and retrofit of sensor networks in process plants, AIChE J, 43(9): 2300-2306.
5. Bhushan, M. and Rengaswamy, R., 2002, Comprehensive design of a sensor network for chemical plants based on various diagnosability and reliability criteria. 1. Framework, Ind Eng Chem Res, 41(7): 1826-1839.
6. Bhushan, M. and Rengaswamy, R., 2002, Comprehensive design of a sensor network for chemical plants based on various diagnosability and reliability criteria. 2. Applications, Ind Eng Chem Res, 41(7): 1840-1860.
7. Cadima, J.F. and Jolliffe, I.T., 1995, Loadings and correlations in the interpretation of principal components, J Appl Stat, 22(2): 203-214.
8. Davis, R., 1984, Diagnosis reasoning based on structure and behavior, Artificial Intelligence, 24: 347-410.
9. Himmelblau, D., 1978, Fault detection and diagnosis in chemical and petrochemical processes (Elsevier, New York, USA).
10. Honeywell, 2001, Guide to the ShadowPlant FCCU Standard Model.
11. Kassidas, A., Taylor, P.A. and MacGregor, J.F., 1998, Off-line diagnosis of deterministic faults in continuous dynamic multivariable processes using speech recognition methods, Journal of Process Control, 8(5-6): 381-393.
12. Kothare, M.V., Shinnar, R., Rinard, I. and Morari, M., 2000, On defining the partial control problem: concept and examples, AIChE J, 46(12): 2456-2474.
13. Kretsovalis, A. and Mah, H.R.S., 1987, Effect of redundancy on estimation accuracy in process data reconciliation, Chem Eng Sci, 42(9): 2115-2121.
14. McCabe, G.P., 1984, Principal variables, Technometrics, 26(2): 137-144.
15. Ng, Y.S. and Srinivasan, R., 2004, Fault diagnosis during process transitions using SOM and clustering approaches, Presented in the AIChE Annual Meeting, Austin, TX, 7-12 Nov.
16. Qian, M.S., 2005, Efficient methodologies for real-time state identification during process transitions, PhD thesis, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
17. Prasad, P.K., Davis, J.F., Jirapinyo, Y., Josephson, J.R. and Bhalodia, M., 1998, Structuring diagnostic knowledge for large-scale process systems, Comput Chem Eng, 22(12): 1897-1905.
18. Sen, S., Narasimhan, S. and Deb, K., 1998, Sensor network design of linear processes using genetic algorithms, Comput Chem Eng, 22(3): 385-390.
19. Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J., 1995, Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research (Freeman, New York, USA).
20. Srinivasan, R. and Qian, M., 2005, Offline temporal signal comparison using singular points augmented time warping, Ind Eng Chem Res, 44(13): 4697-4716.
21. Srinivasan, R. and Qian, M., 2007, Online temporal signal comparison using singular points augmented time warping, Ind Eng Chem Res, 46(13): 4531-4548.
22. Srinivasan, R. and Qian, M., 2006, Online fault diagnosis and state identification during process transitions using dynamic locus analysis, Chem Eng Sci, 61: 6109-6132.
23. Srinivasan, R., Viswanathan, P., Vedam, H. and Nochur, A., 2005a, A framework for managing transitions in chemical plants, Comput Chem Eng, 29(2): 305-322.
24. Srinivasan, R., Wang, C., Ho, W.K. and Lim, K.W., 2005b, Neural network systems for multi-dimensional temporal pattern classification, Comput Chem Eng, 29(5): 965-981.
25. Srinivasan, R., Wang, C., Ho, W.K. and Lim, K.W., 2005c, Context-based recognition of process states using neural networks, Chem Eng Sci, 60(4): 935-949.
26. Srinivasan, R., Wang, C., Ho, W.K. and Lim, K.W., 2004, Dynamic PCA based methodology for clustering process states in agile chemical plants, Ind Eng Chem Res, 43(9): 2123-2139.
27. Sundarraman, A. and Srinivasan, R., 2003, Monitoring transitions in chemical plants using enhanced trend analysis, Comput Chem Eng, 27(10): 1455-1472.
28. Tyreus, B.D., 1999, Dominant variables for partial control. 1. A thermodynamic method for their identification, Ind Eng Chem Res, 38(4): 1432-1443.
29. Venkatasubramanian, V., Rengaswamy, R., Yin, K. and Kavuri, S.N., 2003, A review of process fault detection and diagnosis. I. Quantitative model-based methods, Comput Chem Eng, 27(3): 293-311.