Dominant variables for partial control. 1. A thermodynamic method for their identification

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 1432-1443

  Tyréus, Björn D ^a  

^a DUPONT COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECENTRALIZED CONTROL; DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER CONTROL SYSTEMS; FEEDBACK CONTROL; FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); THERMODYNAMICS;

PARTIAL CONTROL;

PROCESS CONTROL;

PROCESS CONTROL; THERMODYNAMICS; VARIABILITY;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; ECONOMICS; ENERGY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0345251968     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie980619y     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Shinnar, R. Chemical Reactor Modeling for the Purposes of Controller Design. Chem. Eng. Commun. 1981, 9, 73-99.
2. Arbel, A.; Rinard, I. H.; Shinnar, R. Dynamics and Control of Fluidized Catalytic Crackers. 3. Designing the Control System: Choice of Manipulated and Measured Variables for Partial Control. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 35, 2215-2233.
3. Arbel, A.; Rinard, I. H.; Shinnar, R. Dynamics and Control of Fluidized Catalytic Crackers. 4. The Impact of Design on Partial Control. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997, 36, 747-759.
4. Kothare, M. V.; Shinnar, R.; Rinard, I. H.; Morari, M. On Defining the Partial Control Problem: Concepts and Examples. Proc. ACC (Philadelphia, PA) 1998.
5. Burkhardt, H. System Physics: A Uniform Approach to the Branches of Classical Physics. Am. J. Phys. 1987, 55, 344-350.
6. Fuchs, H. U. The Dynamics of Heat; Springer: New York, 1996.
7. Falk, G.; Herrmann, F.; Schmid, G. B. Energy Forms or Energy Carriers? Am. J. Phys. 1983, 51, 1074-1077.
8. Schmid, G. B. An Up-to-Date Approach to Physics. Am. J. Phys. 1984, 52, 794-799.
9. Georgakis, C. On the Use of Extensive Variables in Process Dynamics and Control. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1986, 41, 1471-1484.
10. Ydstie, B. E.; Viswanath, K. P. From Thermodynamics to a Macroscopic Theory of Process Control. Proc. Process Syst. Eng. (Kyongju, Korea) 1994.
11. Ydstie, B. E.; Coffey, D. P. Distributed Control and Real-Time Optimization of a Chemical Process. Proc. DYCOPS-5 (Corfu, Greece) 1998.
12. Downs, J. J.; Vogel, E. F. A Plant-wide Industrial Process Control Problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1993, 17, 245-255.
13. Arbel, A.; Huang, Z.; Rinard, I. H.; Shinnar, R.; Sapre, A. V. Dynamics and Control of Fluidized Catalytic Crackers. 1. Modeling of the Current Generation of FCC's. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1995, 34, 1228-1243.
14. Alberty, R. A.; Gehrig, C. A. Thermodynamic Properties of Alkene Isomer Groups. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1985, 14, 803.
15. Arbel, A.; Rinard, I. H.; Shinnar, R. Dynamics and Control of Fluidized Catalytic Crackers. 4. The Impact of Design on Partial Control. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1997, 36, 747-759.