Dynamic Principal Component Analysis Based Methodology for Clustering Process States in Agile Chemical Plants

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 43, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 2123-2139

  Srinivasan, R ^a   Wang, C ^a   Ho, W K ^a   Lim, K W ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA ACQUISITION; DATA PROCESSING; FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROCESS CONTROL; SIGNALING;

CLUSTERING; MANUAL ANNOTATION; PROCESS STATES; QUASI STEADY STATES;

CHEMICAL PLANTS;

CHEMICAL PLANT; CONTROL SYSTEM;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; DYNAMICS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; METHODOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHASE TRANSITION; PHYTOCHEMISTRY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROCESS DESIGN; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; SIMULATION; STEADY STATE;

EID: 1942484899     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie034051r     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Srinivasan, R.; Vedam, H.; Nochur, A. Characterizing Operating States in Chemical Plants: Application to a Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit. Presented at the AIChE Annual Meeting, Reno, NV, Nov 4-9, 2001.
2. Rosen, C.; Yuan, Z. Supervisory control of wastewater treatment plants by combining principal component analysis and fuzzy c-means clustering. Water Sci. Technol. 2001, 43, 147-156.
3. Arnold, M. W.; Darius, I. H. Alarm management in batch process control. ISA Trans. 1989, 28 (3), 33-40.
4. Roverso, D. Soft computing tools for transient classification. Inf. Sci. 2000, 127 (3), 137-156.
5. Cao, S. L.; Rhinehart, R. R. An efficient method for on-line identification of steady state. J. Process Control 1995, 5 (6), 363-374.
6. Jiang, T. W.; Chen, B. Z.; He, X. R.; Stuart, P. Application of steady-state detection method based on wavelet transform. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2003, 27, 569-578.
7. Sebzalli, Y. M.; Wang, X. Z. Knowledge discovery from process operational data using PCA and fuzzy clustering. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2001, 14 (5), 607-616.
8. Zullo, L. Validation and verification of continuous plants operating modes using multivariate statistical methods. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1996, 683-688.
9. Eltoft, T.; de Figueiredo, R. J. P. A new neural network for cluster detection and labeling. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 2001, 9 (5), 1021-1035.
10. Lawrence, M., Jr. Applied engineering statistics for practicing engineers; Barnes and Noble, Inc.: New York, 1970.
11. John, P. W. M. Statistical methods in engineering and quality assurance; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1990.
12. Brown, P. R.; Rhinehart, R. R. Automated steady-state identification in multivariable systems. Process Control Inf. Syst. 2000, 79-83.
13. Pravdova, V.; Walczak, B.; Massart, D. L. A comparison of two algorithms for warping of analytical signals. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 1-16.
14. Kassidas, A.; MacGregor, J. F.; Taylor, P. A. Synchronization of batch trajectories using dynamic time warping. AIChE J. 1998, 44 (4), 864-875.
15. Jolliffe, I. T. Principal component analysis; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1986.
16. Kano, M.; Hasebe, S.; Hashimoto, I.; Ohno, H. A new multivariate statistical process monitoring method using principal component analysis. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2001, 25, 1103-1113.
17. Krzanowski, W. J. Between-Groups Comparison of Principal Components. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1979, 74, 703-707.
18. Singhal, A.; Seborg, D. E. Matching patterns from historical data using PCA and distance similarity factors. Proc. Am. Control Conf 2001, 1759-1764.
19. Chen, J. H.; Liu, K. C. On-line batch process monitoring using dynamic PCA and dynamic PLS models. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57, 63-75.
20. Montgomery, D. C.; Runger, G. C. Applied statistics and probability for engineers; Wiley: New York, 1994.
21. Khalilian, M.; Dhib, R. Online identification and control of a fluidized catalytic cracking unit. Proc. IASTED Int. Conf Model., Identif., Control 2001, 448-452.
22. Pramit, S.; Raghunathan, R. Multivariable gain-scheduled fuzzy logic control of a fluidized catalytic cracker unit. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 24 (2-7), 1083-1089.
23. Honeywell Inc. Guide to the Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit Standard Model; 2000.
24. Valle, S.; Li, W. H.; Qin, S. J. Selection of the number of principal components: the variance of the reconstruction error criterion with a comparison to other methods. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1999, 38, 4389-4401.
25. Ku, W.; Storer, R. H.; Georgakis, C. Disturbance detection and isolation by dynamic principal component analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1995, 30, 179-196.
26. Downs, J. J.; Vogel, E. F. A plant-wide industrial process control problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1993, 17 (3), 245-255.
27. McAvoy, T. J.; Ye, N. Base control for the Tennessee Eastman problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1994, 18 (5), 383-413.
28. Huang, Y.; Gertler, J.; McAvoy, T. J. S. actuator fault isolation by structured partial PCA with nonlinear extensions. J. Process Control 2000, 10 (5), 459-469.