Information science: An interdisciplinary effort?

Journal of Documentation

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 7-23

  Adam Holland, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Information science; Integration

Indexed keywords

EID: 38549103566     PISSN: 00220418     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00220410810844132     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Allen, B. (1991), “Cognitive research in information science: implications for design”, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 26.
2. (The) American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (2001), Delta, New York, NY.
3. Becher, T. and Trowler, P. (2001), Academic Tribes and Territories, 2nd ed., Open University Press, Buckingham.
4. Belkin, N. (1990), “The cognitive viewpoint in information science”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 16, pp. 1115.
5. Bennington, G. (1999), “Inter”, in Ed. McQuillan, M., Ed. MacDonald, G., Ed. Purves, R. and Ed. Thomson, S. (Eds), PostTheory: New Directions in Criticism, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 103119.
6. Biglin, A. (1973), “The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 57 No. 3, pp. 195203.
7. Borgman, C. (2004), EScience, Digital Libraries and Knowledge Communities, Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford.
8. Braun, T. and Schubert, A. (2003), “A quantitative view on the coming of age of interdisciplinarity in the sciences 19801999”, Scientometrics, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 183189.
9. Brier, S. (2004), “Cybersemiotics and the problems of the informationprocessing paradigm as a candidate for a unified science of information behind library information science: 1”, Library Trends, Vol. 52 No. 3, p. 629.
10. Clark, A. (1997), Being There, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
11. Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. (1998), “The extended mind”, Analysis, Vol. 58 No. 1, pp. 719.
12. Coleman, A. (2002), “Interdisciplinarity”, DLib Magazine, Vol. 8 Nos 7 / 8.
13. Crane, D. and Small, H. (1992), “American sociology since the seventies: the emerging identity crisis in the discipline”, in Ed. Halliday, T. and Ed. Janowitz, M. (Eds), Sociology and Its Publics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 197234.
14. Crane, M. and Richardson, A. (1999), “Literary studies and cognitive science: toward a new interdisciplinary”, Mosaic, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 123140.
15. de May, M. (1977), “The cognitive view point: its development and its scope”, in Ed. de May, M. (Ed.), International Workshop on the Cognitive Viewpoint, University of Ghent, Ghent.
16. Dogan, M. (1996), “The hybridization of social science knowledge”, Library Trends, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 296315.
17. Dogan, M. (2001), “Specialization and recombination of specialties in the social sciences”, in Ed. Smelser, N. and Ed. Baltes, P. (Eds), International Enclyclopaedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp. 1485114855.
18. Eliasmith, C. (1996), “The third contender: a critical examination of the dynamicist theory of cognition”, Philosophical Psychology, Vol. 9 No. 4.
19. Geertz, C. (1983), Local Knowledge: Further Essays on Interpretive Anthropology, Basic Books, New York, NY.
20. Glasrud, B. (1999), “The dark side of collaboration”, Nonprofit World: Madison, Vol. 17 No. 6, p. 20.
21. Goodlad, S. (1979), “What is an academic discipline?”, in Ed. Cox, R. (Ed.), Cooperation and Choice in Higher Education, University of London, London.
22. Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S. and Sonnenwald, D. (2003), “An emerging view of scientific collaboration: scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 54 No. 10, pp. 952965.
23. Heckhausen, H. (1972), Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
24. Hjørland, B. (2000), “Library and information science: practice, theory and philosophical basis”, Information Processing and Management, Vol. 36, pp. 501531.
25. Hjørland, B. (2002), “Epistemology and the sociocognitive perspective in information science”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 53 No. 4, pp. 257270.
26. Hjørland, B. (2004), “Arguments for philosophical realism in library and information science”, Library Trends, Vol. 52 No. 3, pp. 488506.
27. Klein, J.T. (1990), Interdisciplinarity, Wayne State University Press, Detroit, MI.
28. Klein, J.T. (1996), “Interdisciplinary needs: the current context”, Library Trends, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 134155.
29. Klein, J.T. and Newell, W. (1998), “Advancing interdisciplinary study”, in Ed. Newell, W. (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the Literature, College Entrance Examination Board, New York, NY.
30. Lepore, E. and Pylyshyn, Z. (Eds) (1999), What Is Cognitive Science?, Blackwell, Oxford.
31. Leshner, A.I. (2004), “Science at the leading edge”, Science, Vol. 303 No. 5659, p. 729.
32. Michaud, G. and Abt, C.C. (1972), Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities, Introduction, OECD, Paris.
33. Miller, R. (1982), “Varieties of interdisciplinary approaches in the social science”, Issues in Integrative Studies, Vol. 1.
34. Moran, J. (2002), Interdisciplinarity, Routledge, London.
35. Newby, G. (2001), “Cognitive space and information space”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 52 No. 12, pp. 10261048.
36. O'Brien, G. and Opie, J. (1999), “A connectionist theory of phenomenal experience”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 22, pp. 127148.
37. Oldnall, A. (1995), “Nursing as an emerging academic discipline”, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 21, pp. 605612.
38. Piaget, J. (1972), “The epistemology of interdisciplinary relationships”, Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities, OECD, Paris.
39. Piszczalski, M. (2001), “Complexities of collaboration”, Automotive Manufacturing & Production; Cincinnati, Vol. 113 No. 7, p. 16.
40. Pörksen, U. (1995), Plastic Words: The Tyranny of a Modular Language, Pennsylvania University Press, University Park, PA (trans. Mason, J. and Cayley, D.).
41. Port, R. and Van Gelder, T. (1995), Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
42. Post, D. and Votta, L. (2005), “Computational science demands a new paradigm”, Physics Today, Vol. 58 No. 1, p. 35.
43. Power, M. (2003), Rethinking Development Geographies, Routledge, New York, NY.
44. Rogers, Y. (2004), “New theoretical approaches for HCI”, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 38, pp. 87143.
45. Rogers, Y., Scaife, M. and Rizzo, A. (2003), “Interdisciplinarity: an emergent or engineered process?”, CSRP Technical Report, Vol. 556, University of Sussex, Brighton.
46. Roos, V. and Lombard, A. (2003), “Interdisciplinary collaboration: an ongoing community narrative”, Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 31 No. 5, p. 543.
47. Saracevic, T. and Dalbello, M. (2001), “A survey of digital library education“, paper presented at Libraries in the Digital Age, LIDA 2001, Dubrovnik, 2327 May.
48. Stember, M. (1998), “Advancing the social sciences through interdisciplinary enterprise”, in Ed. Newell, W. (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the Literature, College Entrance Examination Board, New York, NY.
49. Swoboda, W. (1979), “Disciplines and interdisciplinarity: a historical perspective”, in Ed. Kockelmans, J. (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity and Higher Education, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA.
50. Talja, S., Keso, H. and Pietilainen, T. (1999), “The production of ‘context’ in information seeking research: a metatheoretical view”, Information Processing & Management, Vol. 35 No. 6, pp. 751763.
51. Talja, S., Tuominen, K. and Savolainen, R. (2005), “‘Isms’ in information science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 61 No. 1, p. 79.
52. Tuominen, K., Talja, S. and Savolainen, R. (2002), “Discourse, cognition and reality: towards a social constructionist metatheory for library and information science”, in Ed. Fidel, R., Ed. Bruce, H., Ed. Ingwersen, P. and Ed. Vakkari, P. (Eds), Emerging Frameworks and Methods: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4)Libraries Unlimited, Seattle, WA, pp. 271283.
53. van den Besselaar, P. and Heimeriks, G. (2001), “Disciplinary, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary concepts and indicators”, in Ed. Wilson, C. and Ed. Davis, M. (Eds), Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Infometrics, UNSW, Sydney, pp. 705716.
54. Von Eckardt, B. (2001), “Multidisciplinarity and cognitive science”, Cognitive Science, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 453470.
55. Wilson, P. (1996), “Interdisciplinary research and information overload”, Library Trends, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 192204.
56. Zhao, S. (1991), “Disciplinary and intradisciplinary competition in sociology: integration through domain differentiation”, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, p. 195.