Wrapping the naive bayes classifier to relax the effect of dependences

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4881 LNCS, Issue , 2007, Pages 229-239

  Cortizo, Jose Carlos ^a,b   Giraldez, Ignacio ^b   Gaya, Mari Cruz ^b  

^a Artificial Intelligence and Network Solutions SL

^b UNIVERSIDAD EUROPEA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

(In)dependence assumption; DGW; Feature evaluation and selection; Naive bayes; Wrapper

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SET THEORY;

FEATURE EVALUATION; INDEPENDENCE ASSUMPTION; NAIVE BAYES; WRAPPERS;

FEATURE EXTRACTION;

EID: 38449093264     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-77226-2_24     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Rish, I.: An empirical study of the naive bayes classifier. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, American Association for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 41-46 (2001)
2. Fisher, R.: The use of multiple measurements in taxonomie problems. Annals of Eugenics 7, 179-188 (1936)
3. Bayes, T.: An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philosophical Transactions 53, 370-418 (1963)
4. Kononenko, I.: Semi-naive bayesian classifier. In: EWSL 1991. Proceedings of the European working session on learning on Machine learning, pp. 206-219. Springer, New York (1991)
5. Zhang, H., Ling, C.X., Zhao, Z.: The learnability of naive bayes. In: Hamilton, H.J. (ed.) AI 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1822, pp. 432-441. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
6. Kononenko, L: Inductive and bayesian learning in medical diagnosis. Applied Artificial Intelligence 7(4), 317-337 (1993)
7. Lewis, D.D.: Representation and learning in information retrieval. PhD thesis, Amherst, MA, USA (1992)
8. Lewis, D.D.: Naive (Bayes) at forty: The independence assumption in information retrieval. In: Nédellec, C., Rouveirol, C. (eds.) ECML 1998. LNCS, vol. 1398, pp. 4-15. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
9. Mitchell, T.: Machine Learning, 1st edn. McGraw Hill, New York (1997)
10. Michie, D., Spiegelhalter, D.J., Taylor, C.C.: Machine Learning, Neural and Statistical Classification. Ellis Horwood (1994)
11. Kononenko, I.: Comparison od inductive and naive bayesian learning approaches to automatic knowledge adquisition
12. Langley, P., Iba, W., Thompson, K.: An analysis of bayesian classifiers. In: National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 223-228 (1992)
13. Zhang, H., Su, J.: Naive bayesian classifiers for ranking. In: Boulicaut, J.-F., Esposito, F., Giannotti, F., Pedreschi, D. (eds.) ECML 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3201, pp. 501-512. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
14. Cortizo, J.C., Giráldez, J.I.: Discovering data dependencies in web content mining. In: Gutierrez, J.M., Martinez, J.J., Isaias, P. (eds.) IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet (2004)
15. Cortizo, J.C., Giráldez, J.I.: Multi criteria wrapper improvements to naive bayes learning. In: Corchado, E., Yin, H., Botti, V., Fyfe, C. (eds.) IDEAL 2006. LNCS, vol. 4224, pp. 419-427. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
16. Friedman, N., Geiger, D., Goldszmidt, M.: Bayesian network classifiers. Machine Learning 29(2-3), 131-163 (1997)
17. Kohavi, R.: Scaling up the accuracy of Naive-Bayes classifiers: a decision-tree hybrid. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 202-207 (1996)
18. Pazzani, M.: Constructive induction of cartesian product attributes. ISIS: Information Statistics and Induction in Science (1996)
19. Domingos, P., Pazzani, M.J.: On the optimality of the simple bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Machine Learning 29(2-3), 103-130 (1997)
20. Domingos, P., Pazzani, M.J.: Beyond independence: Conditions for the optimality of the simple bayesian classifier. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 105-112 (1996)
21. Hand, D.J., Yu, K.: Idiot's bayes - not so stupid after all? International Statistical Review 69(3), 299-385 (2001)
22. Bellman, R.: Adaptive Control Processes: a Guided Tour. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1961)
23. Duch, W.: Filter Methods. In: Feature Extraction, Foundations and Applications, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
24. Langley, P.: Selection of relevant features in machine learning. In: Proceedings of the AAI Fall Symposium on Relevance (1994)
25. Kohavi, R., John, G.H.: Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artificial Intelligence 97(1-2), 273-324 (1997)
26. Langley, P., Sage, S.: Induction of selective bayesian classifiers, pp. 399-406 (1994)
27. Pazzani, M.J.: Searching for Dependencies in Bayesian Classifiers. In: 5thWorkshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (1996)
28. Kittler, J.: Feature Selection and Extraction. In: Handbook of Pattern Recognition and Image Processing, Academic Press, London (1986)
29. Newman, D., Hettich, S., Blake, C., Merz, C.: UCI repository of machine learning databases (1998)
30. Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)
31. Hall, M.A.: Correlation-based Feature Selection for Machine Learning. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Waikato (1998)