Group reward contingencies and cooperative learning: Immediate and delayed effects on academic performance, self-esteem, and sociometric ratings

Social Psychology of Education

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 73-87

  Chapman, Elaine S ^a   Cope, Melissa T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b St Monica's College   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3843104663     PISSN: 13812890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:SPOE.0000010669.95227.f3     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aronson, E. (2000). Nobody left to hate: Teaching compassion after Columbine. New York: W.H. Freeman.
2. Calderón, M., Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Ivory, G., & Slavin, R.E. (1997). Effects of bilingual cooperative integrated reading and composition on students' transitioning from Spanish to English reading. Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on Effective Schooling for Disadvantaged Students, Johns Hopkins University. Report No. 10.
3. Chapman, E.S. (1998). Key considerations in the design and implementation of effective PAL programs. In K. Topping & S. Ehly (Eds.), Peer assisted learning. New York: Erlbaum; pp. 146-154.
4. Cohen, E. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
5. Deci, E.L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R.M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 1-27.
6. Fielding, L.G. & Pearson, D.P. (1994). Reading comprehension: What works. Educational Leadership, 51, 62-68.
7. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Kazdan, S.A., Karns, K., Calhoon, M.B., Hamlett, C.L., & Hewlitt, S.E. (2000). Effects of workgroup structure and size on student productivity during collaborative work on complex tasks. Elementary School Journal, 100(3), 183-212.
8. Greenwood, C.R., Carta, J.J., & Hall, R.V. (1988). The use of peer tutoring strategies in classroom management and educational instruction. School Psychology Review, 17(2), 258-275.
9. Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory into Practice, 38 (2), 67-73.
10. Kohn, A. (1996). By all available means: Cameron and Pierce's defense of extrinsic motivators. Review of Educational Research, 66(1), 1-4.
11. Mael, F.A. (1998). Single-sex and coeducational schooling: Relationships to socioemotional and academic development. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 101-129.
12. Mattingly, R.M. & VanSickle, R.L. (1991). Cooperative learning and achievement in social studies: Jigsaw II. Social Education, 55(6), 392-395.
13. Neale, M. (1988). The Neale analysis of reading ability - Revised. Melbourne, Australia: The Australian Council for Educational Research.
14. Piers, E.V. (1984). Piers-Harris children's self-concept scale - Revised manual. California: Western Psychological Services.
15. Slavin, R.E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice (2nd edn). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
16. Slavin, R.E. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 43-69.
17. Slavin, R.E. & Cooper, R. (in press). Improving intergroup relations: Lessons learned from cooperative learning programs. Journal of Social Issues.
18. Stevens, R.J. & Durkin, S. (1992). Using student team reading and student team writing in middle schools: Two evaluations. Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on Effective Schooling for Disadvantaged Students, Johns Hopkins University. Report No. 36.
19. Stevens, R.J., Madden, N.A., Slavin, R.E., & Farnish, A.M. (1987). Cooperative integrated reading and composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 433-454.
20. Stevens, R.J., Slavin, R.E., & Farnish, A.M. (1989). A cooperative learning approach to elementary reading and writing instruction: Long-term effects. Baltimore, MD: Centre for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools. Report No. 42.
21. Stevens, R.J., Slavin, R.E., & Farnish, A.M. (1991). The effects of cooperative learning and direct instruction in reading comprehension strategies on main idea identification. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 8-16.