Simulators in interventional radiology training and evaluation: A paradigm shift is on the horizon

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 11 II, 2006, Pages

  Patel, Aalpen A ^a   Gould, Derek Alan ^b  

^a HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETENCE; EVALUATION; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL ERROR; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; REVIEW; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; STANDARD; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 33845435899     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000247928.77832.C4     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Kohn JT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. eds. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Healthcare System. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1999.
2. Dawson S. Procedural simulation: a primer J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17:205-213.
3. Villegas L, Schneider BE, Callery MP, Jones DB. Laparoscopic skills training. Surg Endosc 2003; 17:1879-1888.
4. Crofts TJ, Griffiths JM, Sharma S, et al. Surgical training: an objective assessment of recent changes for a single health board. BMJ 1997; 314:814.
5. A performance management bias and error glossary. Available at: www.work911.com/performance/particles/bias.htm. Accessed July 16, 2006.
6. Performance appraisal handbook. A supervisor's guide to the performance appraisal system for staff employees, Western Kentucky University. Available at: http://www.wku.edu/Dept/Support/HR/AAAweb/PAH.doc. Accessed July 16, 2006.
7. Performance appraisal and standards forum. Available at: http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/Per-Pro/Performance-Appraisal- and-Standards.html#BIAS_AND_ERRORS. Accessed July 16, 2006.
8. IDS working time: European working time directive. Available at: http://www.incomesdata.co.uk/information/worktimedirective.htm. (accessed May 4, 2006).
9. http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/dutyHours/dh_Lang703.pdf. Accessed July 16, 2006.
10. Dankeman J, Chmarra MK, Verdaasdonk EGG, Stassen LPS, Grimbergen CA. Fundamental aspects of learning minimally invasive surgical skills: review. Minimally Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2005; 14 (4/5):247-256.
11. Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Incorporated; 1996.
12. Kneebone R, Kidd J, Nestel D, et al. Blurring the boundaries: scenario-based simulation in a clinical setting. Med Ed 2005; 39:580-587.
13. ER-sim: the online interactive shockwave medical simulation game. Available at: www.ersim.com. Accessed July 16, 2006.
14. A Computer Simulator for Ultrasound Guided Needle Insertion Procedures. University of Leeds, School of Computing. Available at: http://www.comp.leeds. ac.uk/drm/vie05.pdf. Accessed May 4, 2006.
15. NCARAI-Immersive Simulation. Available at: http://www.nrl.navy.mil/aic/ ims. Accessed July 16, 2006.
16. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Yale University & Queen's University, Belfast. Ann Surg 2002; 236(4):458-464.
17. Southgate L, Grant J. Principles for an assessment system for postgraduate medical training. A working paper for the Postgraduate Medical Education Training Board; September 2004.
18. Dauphinee WD. Licensure and certification. In: Norman GR, Van der Vleuten CPM, Newble DI, eds. International Handbook of Research in Medical Education, Part 2. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002:836.
19. The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Skills for the New Millennium: Report of the Societal Needs Working Group. CanMEDS 2000 Project . Ottawa: RCPSC;1996.
20. Datta V, Bann S, Beard J, Mandalia M, Darzi A. Comparison of bench test evaluations of surgical skill with live operating performance assessments. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 199(4):603-606.
21. Faulkner H, Regehr G, Martin J, Reznick R. Validation of an objective structured assessment of technical skill for surgical residents. Acad Med 1996; 71:1363-1365.
22. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker SK, Darzi A. Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ 2003; 327:1032-1037.
23. Cushieri A, Francis N, Crosby J, Hanna GB. What do master surgeons think of surgical competence and revalidation? Am J Surg 2001; 182:110-116.
24. European Association Of Endoscopic Surgeons. Training and assessment of competence. Surg Endosc 1994; 8:721-722.
25. Faulkner H, Regehr G, Martin J. Validation of an objective structured assessment of technical skill for surgical residents. Acad Med 1966; 71:1363-1365.
26. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Sarker SK, et al. Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery. BMJ 2003; 327:1032-1037.
27. Battles JB, Wilkinson SL, Lee SJ. Using standardized patients in an objective structured clinical examination as a patient safety tool. Qual Safety Health Care 2004; 13:S46-S50.
28. Reznick R, Regehr G, MacRae H, et al. Testing technical skill via an innovative "bench station" examination. Am J Surg 1997; 173:226-230.
29. Taffinder N, McManus I, Jansen J, et al. An objective assessment of surgeons' psychomotor skills: validation of the MIST-VR laparoscopic simulator. Br J Surg 1998; 85:S75.
30. Gallagher AG, Cates CU. Virtual reality training for the operating room and cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Lancet 2004; 364:1538-1540.
31. Sherman KP, Ward JW, Wills DPM. Mohsen AMMA, Surgical trainee assessment using a VE knee arthroscopy training system (VE-KATS): experimental results. In: Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 9. Westwood JD, Hoffman HM, Mogel GT et al, eds. Amsterdam IOS Press;2001:465-470.
32. Dick WO, Carey L, Carey JO. The Systematic Design of Instruction, 4th ed. New York: HarperCollins; 1996: chap 3, 6.
33. Grunwald T, Clark D, Fisher SS, et al. Using cognitive task analysis to facilitate collaboration in development of simulators to accelerate surgical training. In: Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 12. Westwood JD, Haluck RS, Hoffman HM, Mogel GT, Phillips R, Robb RA, Eds. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2004: pp. 114-120.
34. Johnson SJ, Healey AE, Evans JC, et al. Physical and cognitive task analysis in interventional radiology. J Clin Radiol 2006; 61:97-103.
35. Lewandowski W. Performing a task analysis: the critical step in creating a simulation that improves human performance. In: Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 12. Westwood JD, Haluck RS, Hoffman HM, Mogel GT, Phillips R, Robb RA, Eds. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2004: 90-91.
36. Gould DA, Kessel DO, Healey AE, et al. Simulators in catheter based interventional radiology: training or computer games? J Clin Radiol 2006; 61:556-561.
37. Hsu JH, Dyounan S, et al. Use of computer simulation for determining endovascular skill levels in a carotid stenting model. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40:1118-1124.
38. Dayal R, Faries PL, Lin SC, et al. Computer simulation as a component of catheter based training. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40:1112-1117.
39. Agarwal R, Black SA, Hance JR, Darzi A, Cheshire NJW. Virtual reality simulation can improve inexperienced surgeon's endovascular skills. Eur J Endovasc Surg 2006; 31:588-593.
40. Gould DA, Healey A, Phillips R, Ward JW, et al. Challenges in realising effective radiological interventional virtual environments-the CRaIVE approach, In: Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 12. Westwood JD, Haluck RS, Hoffman HM, Mogel GT, Phillips R, Robb RA, Eds. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2004: pp. 127-129.
41. USFDA. The Orphan Drug Act (as amended). Available at: http://www.fda.gov/orphan/oda.htm. Accessed July 16, 2006.
42. O'Leary MD, Simone C, Washio T, Yokinaha K, Okamura AM. Robotic needle insertion: effects of friction and needle geometry. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Taipei, Taiwan: pp 1774-1780.
43. Laparoscopy medical malpractice compensation settlements. Available at: http://www.lawmedmal.ca/laparoscopy.htm. Accessed July 16, 2006.
44. Chisari MG, Finocchiaro A, Lo Menzo E, Rosato V, Basile G. Laparoscopic surgery: from clinic to legal medicine. Minerva Chir 2004 Dec; 59:589-596.
45. Medical Simulation Corporation, Sim-Suite Centers. Available at: http://www.medsimulation.com/education_system/centers.asp. Accessed May 4, 2006.
46. Virtual Medical Worlds monthly news service for the virtual medical community. Available at: http://www.hoise.com/vmw/02/articles/vmw/LV-VM-04-02- 22.html. Accessed May 4, 2006.
47. Rosenfield K, Cowley MJ, Jaff MR, et al. SCAI/SVMB/SVS clinical competence statement on carotid stenting: training and credentialing for carotid stenting - multispeciality consensus recommendations, a report of the SCAI/SVMB/SVS writing committee to develop a clinical competence statement on carotid interventions. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 64:1-11.
48. Gould DA, Reekers JA, Kessel DO, et al. Simulation devices in interventional radiology: validation pending J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17:215-216.
49. Gould DA, Healey AE, Johnson SJ, Lewandowski WE, Kessel DO. Metrics for an interventional radiology curriculum: a case for standardisation? Stud Health Technol Informatics 2005; 119:159-164.
50. Joint International Simulation Task Force Strategy. Available at: http://www.cirse.org/_files/contentmanagement/CIRSE_SIR_Joint_Strategy.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2006.
51. Simulation Open Framework Architecture. Available at: http://sofa-framework.org. Accessed July 16, 2006.
52. Ebenholtz SM. Motion sickness and oculomotor systems in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ 1992; 1:302-305.
53. Pausch R, Crea T, Conway M. A literature survey for virtual environments: military flight simulator visual systems and simulator sickness. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ 1992; 1:344-363.
54. Draper MH. Can your eyes make you sick? Investigating the relationship between the vestibulo-ocular reflex and virtual reality. Available at: http://www.hitl.washington.edu/publications/r-96-3. Accessed May 23, 2006
55. DiZio P, Lackner JR. Spatial orientation, adaptation, and motion sickness in real and virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ 1992; 1:319-328.
56. Irvine D. Medical professionalism. Evidence from Sir Donald Irvine. Available at: http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/wp/medprof/medprof_prog_041216.asp. Accessed May 23, 2006.
57. Federal Aviation Administration. Aviation safety: research supports limited use of personal computer aviation training devices for pilots (letter report, 07/12/1999, GAO/RCED-99-143). Available at: http://www.faa.gov/safety/ programs_initiatives/aircraft_aviation/nsp/flight_training/ qualification_process/media/GAO_PCATD.txt. Accessed July 15, 2006.