Double blending: Online theory with on-campus practice in photography instruction

Innovations in Education and Teaching International

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 3-14

  Abrahmov, Shlomo Lee ^a   Ronen, Miky ^a  

^a HOLON INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Photography instruction; Visual literacy; Web based teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 38349157079     PISSN: 14703297     EISSN: 14703300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14703290701757385     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Barrett, T. 2003. Interpreting visual culture. Art Education 56(2): 6-12.
2. Barthes, R. 1977. The photographic message. In Image, music, text, edited by S. Heath. New York: Hill and Wang.
3. _. 1981. Camera lucida. New York: Hill and Wang.
4. Brown, S., and I. Cruickshank. 2003. The virtual studio. The International Journal of Art & Design Education 22(3): 281-88.
5. Carman, J.M. 2002. Blended learning design: Five key ingredients. KnowledgeNet. http://www.knowledgenet.com/pdf/BlendedLearningDesign_1028.PDF.
6. Clarke, G. 1997. How do we read a photograph? In The photograph. Oxford: Oxford University.
7. Cohen, J., and A. Meskin. 2004. On the epistemic value of photographs. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62(2): 197-210.
8. Dean, P., M. Stahl, D. Sylwester, and J. Pear. 2001. Effectiveness of combined delivery modalities for distance learning and resident learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education 2(3): 247-54.
9. Duffy, T.M., B. Dueber, C.L. Hawley. 1998. Critical thinking in a distributed environment: A pedagogical base for the design of conferencing systems. In Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship and discourse, edited by C.J. Bonk and K.S. King. Mahwah, N.J.: LEA Associates.
10. Feinstein, H. 1996. Reading images: Meanings and metaphor. Reston, Va.: The National Art Education Association.
11. Goin, P. 2001. Visual literacy (photography). The Geographical Review 91(1/2): 363-69.
12. Hamilton, P. 2003. Research in progress: The printmaking studio of the future in higher education? Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education 2(1/2): 67-81.
13. Kellner, D. 2002. Critical perspectives on visual imagery in media and cyber culture. Journal of Visual Literacy 22(1): 81-90.
14. Levine, L.W. 1988 The historian and the icon. In Documenting America, 1935-1943, edited by C. Fleishchhauer and B.W. Brannan. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
15. Lopes, D.M. 2003. The aesthetics of photographic transparency. Mind 112(447): 433-48.
16. McDonald, J., and E. McAteer. 2003. New approaches to supporting students: Strategies for blended learning support in distance and campus based environments. Journal of Educational Media 28(2/3): 171-88.
17. Murphy, P. 2003. The hybrid strategy: Blending face-to-face with virtual instruction to improve large section courses. Teaching, Learning, and Technology Center, University of California Regents, http://www.uctltc.org/news/2002/12/ feature.php.
18. Myint, S.K., and L. Atputhasamy. 2003. Blended learning approach in teacher education: Combining face-to-face instruction, multimedia viewing and online discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology 34: 671-75.
19. Newbury, D. 1997. Talking about practice: Photography students, photographic culture and professional identities. British Journal of Sociology and Education 18(3): 421-34.
20. Perkins, D. 1999. The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership 57(3): 6-11.
21. Raney, K. 1999. Visual literacy and the art curriculum. Journal of Art & Design Education 18(1): 42-47.
22. Robbins, J. 2000. Photographic education in the digital age. RPS Journal 140(5): 239-41.
23. Ronen, M., and D. Langley. 2004. Scaffolding complex tasks by open online submission: Emerging patterns and profiles. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 8 (4, December): 39-61. http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/ v8n4/index.asp (accessed 18 February 2005).
24. Sartorius, U. 2000. Images stronger than words: Teaching black and white photography. The Technology Teacher 59(6): 13-16.
25. Sayre, R., S. Dunkerley, D. Horton, and M.R. Fullwood. 1999. Visual literacy in photographic education: Four key elements. Exposure 32(2): 35-44.
26. Tagg, J. 1993. Contact worksheets: Note on photography, history and representation. In The burden of representation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
27. Trachtenberg, A. 1988. From image to story, reading the file. In Documenting America, 1935-1943, edited by C. Fleishchhauer and B.W. Brannan. Berkeley and Los Angles: University of California Press.
28. Voos, R. 2003. Blended learning: What is it and where might it take us? Sloan-C View 2(1, February). http://www.aln.org/publications/view/ v2n1Mended1.htm (accessed 10 September 2003).
29. Walton, K. 1984. Transparent pictures: On the nature of photographic realism. Critical Inquiry 11: 246-77.
30. Zenger, J., and C. Uehlein. 2001. Why blended will win. Training & Development 55(8): 54-60.