MR imaging of the gallbladder: A pictorial essay

Radiographics

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 135-155

  Catalano, Onofrio A ^a,d   Sahani, Dushyant V ^a   Kalva, Sanjeeva P ^a   Cushing, Matthew S ^a   Hahn, Peter F ^a   Brown, Jeffrey J ^b   Edelman, Robert R ^c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d AO G Rummo ^*  (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFERENCE PAPER; GALLBLADDER; GALLBLADDER DISEASE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

GALLBLADDER; GALLBLADDER DISEASES; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 38349119408     PISSN: 02715333     EISSN: 15271323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/rg.281065183     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (61)

1. Clemente D. Excretory apparatus of the liver. In: Clemente D, ed. Gray's anatomy. 30th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Williams & Wilkins, 1985; 1500-1502.
2. Schneider G, Grazioli L, Saini S. Imaging of the biliary tree and gallbladder diseases. In: Schneider G, Grazioli L, Saini S, eds. MRI of the liver. 2nd ed. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2005; 237-266.
3. Sahani DV, Kalva SP. Magnetic resonance imaging of the gallbladder. In: Edelman RR, Hesselink JR, Zlatkin MB, Crues VC, eds. Clinical magnetic resonance imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 2005; 2541-2553.
4. Bader TR, Semelka RC. Gallbladder and biliary system. In: Semelka RC, ed. Abdominal-pelvic MRI. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2006; 447-507.
5. Boyden EA. The accessory gallbladder: an embryological and comparative study of aberrant biliary vesicles occurring in man and in domestic mammals. Am J Anat 1926;38:177-231.
6. Milot L, Partensky C, Scoazec JY, Valette PJ, Pilleul F. Double gallbladder diagnosed on contrast-enhanced MR cholangiopancreatography with mangafodipir trisodium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184(3 suppl):S88-S90.
7. Sherlock S, Dooley J. Gallstones and inflammatory gallbladder diseases. In: Sherlock S, Dooley J, eds. Diseases of the liver and biliary system. 11th ed. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2002; 597-628.
8. Horton JD, Bilhartz LE. Gallstone disease and its complications. In: Fedelman M, Friedman LS, Sleisenger MH, eds. Sleisenger & Fortran's gastrointestinal and liver disease: pathophysiology/diagnosis/management. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 2003; 1065-1090.
9. Gore RM, Yaghmai V, Newmark GM, Berlin JW, Miller FH. Imaging benign and malignant disease of the gallbladder. Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40:1307-1323.
10. Moriyasu F, Ban N, Nishida O, et al. Central signals of gallstones in magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Gastroenterol 1987;82:139-142.
11. Baron RL, Shuman WP, Lee SP, et al. MR appearance of gallstones in vitro at 1.5T: correlation with chemical composition. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:497-502.
12. Tsai HM, Lin XZ, Chen CY, Lin PW, Lin JC. MRI of gallstones with different compositions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:1513-1519.
13. Jeffrey RB, Ralls PW. The gallbladder and bile ducts. In: Jeffrey RB, Ralls PW, eds. CT and sonography of the acute abdomen. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven, 1996; 74-121.
14. Park MS, Yu JS, Kim YH, et al. Acute cholecystitis: comparison of MR cholangiography and US. Radiology 1998;209:781-785.
15. Oh KY, Gilfeather M, Kennedy A, et al. Limited abdominal MRI in the evaluation of acute right upper quadrant pain. Abdom Imaging 2003;28:643-651.
16. Pedrosa I, Guarise A, Goldsmith J, Procacci C, Rofsky NM. The interrupted sign in acute cholecystitis: a method to identify the gangrenous form with MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:360-363.
17. Loud PA, Semelka RC, Kettritz U, Brown JJ, Reinhold C. MRI of acute cholecystitis: comparison with normal gallbladder and other entities. Magn Reson Imaging 1996;14:349-355.
18. Kim KW, Park MS, Yu JS, et al. Acute cholecystitis at T2-weighted and manganese-enhanced T1-weighted MR cholangiography: preliminary study. Radiology 2003;227:580-584.
19. Fayad LM, Holland GA, Bergin D, et al. Functional magnetic resonance cholangiography (fMRC) of the gallbladder and biliary tree with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:449-460.
20. Mirizzi PL. Syndrome del conduct epatico. J Int Chir 1948;8:731-737.
21. Fan ST, Lan WY, Lee MJR, Wong KK. Cholecysto-hepaticodochal fistula: the value of preoperative recognition. Br J Surg 1985;72:743-744.
22. Koehler RE, Melson GL, Lee JK, Long J. Common hepatic duct obstruction by cystic duct stone: Mirizzi syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1979;132:1007-1009.
23. Becker CD, Hassler H, Terrier F. Preoperative diagnosis of the Mirizzi syndrome: limitations of sonography and computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984;143:591-596.
24. Kim PN, Outwater EK, Mitchell DG. Mirizzi syndrome: evaluation by MRI imaging. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:2546-2550.
25. Ros PR, Goodman ZD. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis versus gallbladder carcinoma. Radiology 1997;203:10-12.
26. Levy AD, Murakata LA, Abbott RM, Rohrmann CA Jr. From the archives of the AFIP. Benign tumors and tumorlike lesions of the gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts: radiologic-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 2002;22:387-413.
27. Chun KA, Ha HK, Yu ES, et al. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: features with emphasis on differentiation from gallbladder carcinoma. Radiology 1997;203:93-97.
28. Kim PN, Lee SH, Gong GY, et al. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: radiologic findings with histologic correlation that focuses on intramural nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:949-953.
29. Shuto R, Kiyosue H, Komatsu E, et al. CT and MR imaging findings of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: correlation with pathologic findings. Eur Radiol 2004;14:440-446.
30. Bilhartz LE. Acalculous cholecystitis, cholesterolosis, adenomyomatosis, and polyps of the gallbladder. In: Fedelman M, Friedman LS, Sleisenger MH, eds. Sleisenger & Fortran's gastrointestinal and liver disease: pathophysiology/diagnosis/management. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 2003; 1116-1128.
31. Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Aibe H, et al. Radiologic diagnosis of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder: comparative study among MRI, helical CT, and transabdominal US. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:843-850.
32. Yamao K, Ohashi K. Adenomyomatosis and cholesterolosis. In: Okuda K, Mitchell DG, Itai Y, Ariyama J. Hepatobiliary diseases, pathophysiology and imaging. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2001; 711-720.
33. Haradome H, Ichikawa T, Sou H, et al. The pearl necklace sign: an imaging sign of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder at MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 2003;227:80-88.
34. Kim MJ, Oh YT, Park YN, et al. Gallbladder adenomyomatosis: findings on MRI. Abdom Imaging 1999;24:410-413.
35. Bartlett DL. Gallbladder cancer. Semin Surg Oncol 2000;19:145-155.
36. Sohn TA, Lillemoe KD. Tumors of the gallbladder, bile ducts, and ampulla. In: Fedelman M, Friedman LS, Sleisenger MH, eds. Sleisenger & Fortran's gastrointestinal and liver disease: pathophysiology/diagnosis/management. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 2003; 1153-1164.
37. Levy AD, Murakata LA, Rohrmann CA Jr. Gallbladder carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 2001;21:295-314.
38. Sherlock S, Dooley J. Tumours of the gallbladder and bile ducts. In: Sherlock S, Dooley J, eds. Diseases of the liver and biliary system. 11th ed. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2002; 647-656.
39. Schwartz LH, Black J, Fong Y, et al. Gallbladder carcinoma: findings at MR imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26:405-410.
40. Kalra N, Suri S, Gupta R, et al. MDCT in the staging of gallbladder carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:758-762.
41. Rooholamini SA, Tehrani NS, Razavi MK, et al. Imaging of gallbladder carcinoma. RadioGraphics 1994;14:291-306.
42. Stroszczynski C, Hunerbein M. Malignant biliary obstruction: value of imaging findings. Abdom Imaging 2005;30:314-323.
43. Demachi H, Matsui O, Hoshiba K, et al. Dynamic MRI using a surface coil in chronic cholecystitis and gallbladder carcinoma: radiologic and histopathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:643-651.
44. Wilbur AC, Sagireddy PB, Aizenstein RI. Carcinoma of the gallbladder: color Doppler ultrasound and CT findings. Abdom Imaging 1997;22:187-189.
45. Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Jimi M, et al. MR diagnosis of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder and differentiation from gallbladder carcinoma: importance of showing Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1535-1540.
46. Kim MJ, Kim KW, Kim HC, et al. Unusual malignant tumors of the gallbladder. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:473-480.
47. Tseng JH, Wan YL, Hung CF, et al. Diagnosis and staging of gallbladder carcinoma: evaluation with dynamic MR imaging. Clin Imaging 2002;26:177-182.
48. Kim JH, Kim TK, Eun HW, et al. Preoperative evaluation of gallbladder carcinoma: efficacy of combined use of MR imaging, MR cholangiography, and contrast-enhanced dual-phase three-dimensional MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:676-684.
49. Bickel A, Eitan A, Tsilman B, Cohen HI. Low-grade B cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) arising in the gallbladder. Hepatogastroenterology 1999;46:1643-1646.
50. Chim CS, Liang R, Loong F, Chung LP. Primary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma of the gallbladder. Am J Med 2002;112:505-507.
51. Yamamoto T, Kawanishi M, Yoshiba H, Kanehira E, Itoh H. Primary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of the gallbladder. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:S86-S87.
52. Inoue Y, Komatsu Y, Yoshikawa K, et al. Biliary motor function in gallstone patients evaluated by fatty-meal MR cholangiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:196-203.
53. Koike S, Ito K, Honjo K, Takano K, Yasui M, Matsunaga N. Oddi sphincter and common channel: evaluation with pharmacodynamic MR cholangiopancreatography using fatty meal and secretin stimulation. Radiat Med 2000;18:115-122.
54. Khalid TR, Casillas VJ, Montalvo BM, Centeno R, Levi JU. Using MR cholangiopancreatography to evaluate iatrogenic bile duct injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:1347-1352.
55. Chaudhary A, Negi SS, Puri SK, Narang P. Comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography in the evaluation of bile duct strictures after cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2002;89:433-436.
56. Pavone P, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. MR cholangiography in the examination of patients with biliary-enteric anastomoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:807-811.
57. Vitellas KM, El-Dieb A, Vaswani KK, et al. Using contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography with IV mangafodipir trisodium (Teslascan) to evaluate bile duct leaks after cholecystectomy: a prospective study of 11 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:409-416.
58. Hottat N, Winant C, Metens T, Bourgeois N, Deviere J, Matos C. MR cholangiography with manganese dipyridoxyl diphosphate in the evaluation of biliary-enteric anastomoses: preliminary experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1556-1562.
59. Ward J, Sheridan MB, Guthrie JA, et al. Bile duct strictures after hepatobiliary surgery: assessment with MR cholangiography. Radiology 2004;231:101-108.
60. Morgan B, Utting JF, Higginson A, Thomas AL, Steward WP, Horsfield MA. A simple, reproducible method for monitoring the treatment of tumours using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Br J Cancer 2006;94:1420-1427.
61. Muruganandham M, Lupu M, Dyke JP, et al. Pre-clinical evaluation of tumor microvascular response to a novel antiangiogenic/antitumor agent RO0281501 by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI at 1.5 T. Mol Cancer Ther 2006;5:1950-1957.