MR cholangiography with manganese dipyridoxyl diphosphate in the evaluation of biliary-enteric anastomoses: Preliminary experience

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 184, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1556-1562

  Hottat, Nathalie ^a   Winant, Catherine ^a   Metens, Thierry ^a   Bourgeois, Nadine ^a   Devière, Jacques ^a   Matos, Celso ^a  

^a ERASME HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; MANGAFODIPIR; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DRUG DERIVATIVE; EDETIC ACID; N,N' BIS(PYRIDOXAL 5 PHOSPHATE)ETHYLENEDIAMINE N,N' DIACETIC ACID; N,N'-BIS(PYRIDOXAL-5-PHOSPHATE)ETHYLENEDIAMINE-N,N'-DIACETIC ACID; PYRIDOXAL 5 PHOSPHATE;

ADULT; AGED; BILE DUCT BYPASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MALE; MORPHOLOGICAL TRAIT; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSHEPATIC CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; INTRAHEPATIC BILE DUCT; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; STENOSIS, OCCLUSION AND OBSTRUCTION;

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; BILE DUCTS, INTRAHEPATIC; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; CONTRAST MEDIA; EDETIC ACID; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PYRIDOXAL PHOSPHATE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 19844373462     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.184.5.01841556     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Soto JA, Yucel EK, Barish MA, Siegenberg D, Ferrucci JT, Chuttani R. MR cholangiopancreatography after unsuccessful or incomplete ERCP. Radiology 1996;199:91-98
2. Pavone P, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. MR cholangiography in the examination of patients with biliary-enteric anastomoses. AJR 1997;169:807-811
3. Tang Y, Yamashita Y, Arakawa A, et al. Pancreaticobiliary ductal system value of half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement MR cholangiopancreatography for postoperative evaluation. Radiology 2000;215:81-88
4. Federle MP, Chezmar JL, Rubin DL, et al. Safety and efficacy of mangafodipir trisodium (Mn DPDP) injection for hepatic MRI in adults: results of the US multicenter phase III clinical trials. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:186-197
5. Marti-Bonmati L, Lonjedo E, Poyatos C, Casillas C. Mn-DPDP enhancement characteristics and differentiation between cirrhotic and noncirrhotic livers. Invest Radiol 1998;33:717-722
6. Vitellas KM, El-Dieb A, Vaswani KK, et al. Using contrast-enhanced MR cholangiography with IV mangafodipir trisodium (Teslascan) to evaluate bile duct leaks after cholecystectomy: a prospective study of 11 patients. AJR 2002;179:409-416
7. Lee VS, Rofsky NM, Morgan GR, et al. Volumetric mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced cholangiography to define intrahepatic biliary anatomy. AJR 2001;176:906-908
8. Kapoor V, Peterson MS, Baron RL, Patel S, Eghtesad B, Fung JJ. Intrahepatic biliary anatomy of living adult liver donors: correlation of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR cholangiography and intraoperative cholangiography. AJR 2002;179:1281-1286
9. Fayad L, Holland G, Bergin D, et al. Functional magnetic resonance cholangiography (fMRC) of the gallbladder and biliary tree with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:449-460
10. Lim KO, Stark DD, Leese PT, Pfefferbaum A, Rocklage SM, Quay SC. Hepatobiliary MR imaging: first human experience with MnDPDP. Radiology 1991;178:79-82
11. Mitchell DG, Alam F. Mangafodipir trisodium: effects on T2- and T1-weighted MR cholangiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:280-284
12. Sheppard DG, Houston JG, Charon JP, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRCP: a comparison of Gd-BOPTA and mangafodipir trisodium (abstr.) Proc Intl Soc Magn Reson Med 2001;9:420
13. Kurihara Y, Yakushiji YK, Tani I, Nakajima Y, Van Cauteren M. Coil sensitivity encoding in MR imaging: advantages and disadvantages in clinical practice. AJR 2002;178:1087-1091
14. Bismuth H, Franco D, Corlette MB, et al. Long-term results of Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1978;146:161-167