Beer and wine consumers' perceptions of the nutritional value of alcoholic and nonalcoholic beverages

Journal of Food Science

Volumn 73, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Wright, C A ^a   Bruhn, C M ^a   Heymann, H ^a   Bamforth, C W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Beer; Consumer; Nutrition; Perceptions; Wine

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEER; BEVERAGE; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITIONAL VALUE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; WINE;

ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BEER; BEVERAGES; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITIVE VALUE; WINE;

EID: 38349056376     PISSN: 00221147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00606.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. ACNielsen. 2005. Raising the profile of the lowly food label. Available from : http://us.acnielsen.com/pubs/2005_08_fff_labels.shtml. Accessed Nov 18 2007.
2. Agatston A. 2003. The South Beach diet. New York : Random House. 310 p.
3. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. 2006 Here's To beer Available from : http://www.herestobeer.com/.
4. British Beer and Pub Association. 2005 Beautiful Beer Available from : http://www.beerandpub.com/content.asp?id_Content=1. Accessed Nov 18 2007.
5. Center for Science in the Public Interest 2003. Nutrition Action Health Letter (Dec, 2003). Available from : http://www.nclnet.org/news2003. htm#december. Accessed Nov 18 2007.
6. Clark PJ. 2005. Diet trends affect processing. Food Technol 59 (3 59 60.
7. Coors Brewers Ltd. 2002 Beer...naturally Available from : http://www.beer-naturally.co.uk/html/news.asp. Accessed Nov 18 2007.
8. Dept. of the Treasury - Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau. 2004. Available from : http://www.ttb.gov/rulings/2004 - 1.pdf. Accessed Nov 18 2007.
9. [FDA] Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. A food labeling guide. Available from : http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/ ∼dms/flg-6a.html. Accessed Nov 18 2007.
10. Goerlitz, CD, Delwiche, JF. 2004. Impact of label information on consumer assessment of soy-enhanced tomato juice. J Food Sci 69 (9 376 9.
11. Granzin KL, Olsen JE, Painter JJ. 1998. Marketing to consumer segments using health-promoting lifestyles. J Retail Consumer Serv 5 (3 131 41.
12. Information Resources Inc. 2005. The enjoyment factor: consumers' unwavering demand for taste, indulgence and variety. Times and Trends. July, 23 p. Available from : http://www.gmabrands.com/publications/index.cfm. Accessed Nov 18 2007.
13. Kähkönen P, Tuorila H, Rita H. 1996. How information enhances acceptability of a low-fat spread. Food Qual Prefer 7 (2 87 94.
14. Lando AM, Labiner-Wolfe J. 2007. Helping consumers make more healthful food choices: consumer views on modifying food labels and providing point of purchase nutrition information at quick-service restaurants. J. Nutr Edu Behav 39 (3 157 63.
15. Lawless HT, Heymann H. 1989. Sensory evaluation of food: principles and practices. New York : Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. 827 p.
16. Marietta AB, Welshimer KJ, Long S. 1999. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of college students regarding the 1990 Nutrition Labeling Education Act food labels. J Am Diet Assoc 99 (4 445 9.
17. Schwenk NE, Guthrie JF. 1997. Trends in marketing and usage of fat-modified foods: implication for dietary status and nutrition promotion. Family Econ Nutr Rev 10 (4 16 32.
18. Tepper BJ, Choi YS, Nayaga RM. 1997. Understanding food choice in adult men: influence of nutrition knowledge, food beliefs and dietary restraint. Food Qual Prefer 8 (4 307 17.
19. USDA 2007. Agricultural Research Service Nutrient Data Laboratory. Available from : http://www.ars.usda.gov/main/site_main.htm?modecode=12354500. Accessed Nov 18 2007.
20. Wang J, Gao XM, Wailes EJ, Cramer GL. 1996. US consumer demand for alcoholic beverages: cross-section estimation of demographic and economic effects. Rev Agric Econ 18 (3 477 89.
21. Zimmerman DW, Zumbo BD. 1993. Relative power of the Wilcoxon test, the Friedman test, and repeated-measures ANOVA on ranks. J Exp Educ 62 (1 75 86.