The Rossmax (ME 701 series) upper arm device: Accuracy assessment in an adult population according to the International and the British Hypertension Society protocols

Blood Pressure Monitoring

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 43-48

  De Greeff, Annemarie ^a   Shennan, Andrew H ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation; Blood pressure measurement device; British Hypertension Society; European Society of Hypertension; Oscillometry; Validation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; DEVICE; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; OSCILLOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

ADULT; AGED; ARM; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; DIASTOLE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; SYSTOLE;

EID: 38349027050     PISSN: 13595237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3282ca913f     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Stergiou GS. How to cope with unreliable office blood pressure measurement? Am J Hypertens 2005; 18:1519-1521.
2. Coleman AJ, Steel SD, Ashworth M, Vowler SL, Shennan A. Accuracy of the pressure scale of sphygmomanometers in clinical use within primary care. Blood Press Monit 2005; 10:181-188.
3. Waugh JJ, Gupta M, Rushbrook J, Halligan A, Shennan AH. Hidden errors of aneroid sphygmomanometers. Blood Press Monit 2002; 7:309-312.
4. O'Brien E, Pickering T, Asmar R, Myers M, Parati G, Staessen J, et al. Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit 2002; 7:3-17.
5. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler W, de Swiet M, Padfield P, Altman D, et al. The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens 1993; 11 (Suppl 2):S43-S62.
6. The British Hypertension Society Website. 2006. Ref Type: Internet Communication.
7. O'Brien E. A website for blood pressure measuring devices: dableducational.com Blood Press Monit 2003; 8:177-180.
8. Braam RL, Thien T. The 'International Protocol': more insight or more arithmetic? Blood Press Monit 2002; 7:289-290.
9. Gerin W, Schwartz AR, Schwartz JE, Pickering TG, Davidson KW, Bress J, et al. Limitations of current validation protocols for home blood pressure monitors for individual patients. Blood Press Monit 2002; 7:313-318.
10. BHS website Tutorial. http://www.abdn.ac.uk/medical/bhs/. 2007. Ref type: electronic citation.
11. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. American national standard for electronic or automated sphygmomanometers ANSI/AAMI SP10-1992, 2002. Arlington, VA: AAMI; 1993. 2007. Ref type: report.
12. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i:307-310.
13. Sims AJ, Menes JA, Bousfield DR, Reay CA, Murray A. Automated noninvasive blood pressure devices: are they suitable for use? Blood Press Monit 2005; 10:275-281.
14. Blood pressure measurement devices. Device Bulletin DB2006(3) Department of Health. http://www.mhra.gov.uk. 2007. Ref type: electronic citation.
15. O'Brien E, Atkins N, Murphy A, Lyons S. Validation of the ROSSMAX blood pressure measuring monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for Validation of Blood Pressure Measuring Devices in Adults. Blood Press Monit 2003; 8:261-265.