Program design features that can improve participation in health education interventions

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Volumn 7, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Gucciardi, Enza ^a,b   Cameron, Jill I ^c,d   Liao, Chen Di ^e   Palmer, Alison ^e   Stewart, Donna E ^b,e  

^a RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d TORONTO REHABILITATION INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; CANADA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; SOCIAL CLASS; STATISTICS; TIME; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ONTARIO; OUTPATIENT CLINICS, HOSPITAL; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH DESIGN; SOCIAL CLASS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 38349023282     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-47     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. The educated patient: new challenges for the medical profession. J Neuberger, J Intern Med 2000 247 6 10 10.1046/j.1365-2796.2000.00624.x 10672125
2. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. RJ Cline KM Haynes, Health Educ Res 2001 16 671 692 10.1093/her/16.6.671 11780707
3. The demand for health education among patients with diabetes. M Latalski H Skorzynska A Pacian, Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska [Med ] 2002 57 579 588 12898979
4. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. KR Lorig DS Sobel AL Stewart BW Brown Jr. A Bandura P Ritter VM Gonzalez DD Laurent HR Holman, Med Care 1999 37 5 14 10.1097/00005650-199901000-00003 10413387
5. Improving attendance for breast screening among recent non-attenders: a randomised controlled trial of two interventions in primary care. C Bankhead SH Richards TJ Peters DJ Sharp FD Hobbs J Brown L Roberts C Tydeman V Redman J Formby S Wilson J Austoker, J Med Screen 2001 8 99 105 10.1136/jms.8.2.99 11480451
6. Ophthalmic examination among adults with diagnosed diabetes mellitus. RJ Brechner CC Cowie LJ Howie WH Herman JC Will MI Harris, JAMA 1993 270 1714 1718 10.1001/jama.270.14.1714 8411502
7. [Evaluation of a structured education programme for patients with COPD under outpatient conditions - a pilot study]. Y Dhein C Munks-Lederer H Worth, Pneumologie 2003 57 591 597 10.1055/s-2003-43019 14569530
8. Community organized food and nutrition education: participation, attitudes and nutritional risk in seniors. HH Keller MR Hedley SS Wong P Vanderkooy J Tindale J Norris, J Nutr Health Aging 2006 10 15 20 16453053
9. Evaluation of a diabetes education program in Newcastle, NSW. JM Lowe K Bowen, Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1997 38 91 99 10.1016/S0168-8227(97)00089-2 9483372
10. Meta-analysis of the effects of educational and psychosocial interventions on management of diabetes mellitus. D Padgett E Mumford M Hynes R Carter, J Clin Epidemiol 1988 41 1007 1030 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90040-6 3193136
11. Participation in worksite health promotion: a critique of the literature and recommendations for future practice. RE Glasgow KD McCaul KJ Fisher, Health Educ Q 1993 20 391 408 8307762
12. How generalizable are the results of diabetes self-management research? The impact of participation and attrition. RE Glasgow EG Eakin DJ Toobert, Diabetes Educ 1996 22 573 2, 584 10.1177/014572179602200605 8970287
13. Women and cardiac rehabilitation: referral and compliance patterns. M Halm S Penque N Doll M Beahrs, J Cardiovasc Nurs 1999 13 83 92 10098008
14. Interactive communication strategies: implications for population-based physical-activity promotion. BH Marcus CR Nigg D Riebe LH Forsyth, Am J Prev Med 2000 19 121 126 10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00186-0 10913903
15. Theory-comparison and multiple-behavior research: common themes advancing health behavior research. CR Nigg JP Allegrante M Ory, Health Educ Res 2002 17 670 679 10.1093/her/17.5.670 12408211
16. Frequency and determinants of diabetes patient education among adults in the U.S. population. BA Coonrod J Betschart MI Harris, Diabetes Care 1994 17 852 858 10.2337/diacare.17.8.852 7956630
17. If you build it, will they come?. Reach and Adoption associated with a comprehensive lifestyle management program for women with type 2 diabetes. DJ Toobert LA Strycker RE Glasgow JD Bagdade, Patient Educ Couns 2002 48 99 105 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00120-9 12401412
18. Participation in outpatient diabetes education programs: how many patients take part and how representative are they? RE Glasgow DJ Toobert SE Hampson, Diabetes Educ 1991 17 376 380 10.1177/014572179101700509 1879279
19. Participation in community health screenings: a qualitative evaluation. J Engebretson JS Mahoney G Walker, J Community Health Nurs 2005 22 77 92 10.1207/s15327655jchn2202_2 15877537
20. A longitudinal assessment of inter-sectoral participation in a community-based diabetes prevention programme. CM Andersson G Bjaras P Tillgren CG Ostenson, Soc Sci Med 2005 61 2407 2422 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.032 15951085
21. Factors influencing attendance at cardiac rehabilitation among coronary heart disease patients. RL Farley TD Wade L Birchmore, Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2003 2 205 212 10.1016/S1474-5151(03)00060-4 14622628
22. Hovering between suffering and enduring: the meaning of living with serious chronic illness. M Ohman S Soderberg B Lundman, Qual Health Res 2003 13 528 542 10.1177/1049732302250720 12703414
23. Provider-patient interaction in diabetes care: effects on patient self-care and outcomes. A systematic review. HA van Dam HF van der BB van den R Ryckman H Crebolder, Patient Educ Couns 2003 51 17 28 10.1016/S0738-3991(02) 00122-2 12915276
24. Refusal and information bias associated with postal questionnaires and face-to-face interviews in very elderly subjects. R Hebert G Bravo N KornerBitensky L Voyer, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1996 49 373 381 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00527-7 8676188
25. A home visiting asthma education program: challenges to program implementation. JV Brown AS Demi MP Celano R Bakeman L Kobrynski SR Wilson, Health Educ Behav 2005 32 42 56 10.1177/1090198104266895 15642753
26. Factors determining non-attendance at a cardiac rehabilitation programme following myocardial infarction. C Ramm S Robinson N Sharpe, N Z Med J 2001 114 227 229 11453358
27. Offering a randomized trial of intensive therapy for IDDM to adolescents. Reasons for refusal, patient characteristics, and recruiter effects. KP Tercyak Jr. SB Johnson KA Kirkpatrick JH Silverstein, Diabetes Care 1998 21 213 215 10.2337/diacare.21.2.213 9539984
28. Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies. J Sitzia N Wood, International Journal for Quality in Health Care 1998 10 311 317 10.1093/intqhc/10.4.311 9835247
29. National health surveys by mail or home interview: effects on response. HJ Picavet, J Epidemiol Community Health 2001 55 408 413 10.1136/jech.55.6.408 11350999
30. Mail surveys resulted in more reports of substance use than telephone surveys. TJ Beebe JA McRae Jr. PA Harrison ME Davern KB Quinlan, J Clin Epidemiol 2005 58 421 424 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.007 15868697
31. Is shorter always better? Relative importance of questionnaire length and cognitive ease on response rates and data quality for two dietary questionnaires. AF Subar RG Ziegler FE Thompson CC Johnson JL Weissfeld D Reding KH Kavounis RB Hayes L Prostate Colorectal,and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Investigators, American Journal of Epidemiology 2001 153 404 409 10.1093/aje/153.4.404 11207159
32. A comparison of costs and data quality of three health survey methods: mail, telephone and personal home interview. BI O'Toole D Battistutta A Long K Crouch, American Journal of Epidemiology 1986 124 317 328 3728446
33. Increasing response rates to a smoking survey for U.S. Navy enlisted women. SI Woodruff TL Conway CC Edwards, Evaluation & the Health Professions 2000 23 172 181 10.1177/016327870002300203 10947523
34. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. P Edwards I Roberts M Clarke C DiGuiseppi S Pratap R Wentz I Kwan, BMJ 2002 324 1183 12016181 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183
35. Randomized trial of 5 dollars versus 10 dollars monetary incentives, envelope size, and candy to increase physician response rates to mailed questionnaires. SD Halpern PA Ubel JA Berlin DA Asch, Medical Care 2002 40 834 839 10.1097/00005650-200209000-00012 12218773
36. The effect of a direct payment or a lottery on questionnaire response rates: a randomised controlled trial. PJ Roberts C Roberts B Sibbald DJ Torgerson, J Epidemiol Community Health 2000 54 71 72 10.1136/jech.54.1.71 10692967
37. Effects of incentive size and timing on response rates to a follow-up wave of a longitudinal mailed survey. RL Collins PL Ellickson RD Hays DF McCaffrey, Evaluation Review 2000 24 347 363 11009863
38. Increasing response rates in a survey of Medicaid enrollees: the effect of a prepaid monetary incentive and mixed modes (mail and telephone). TJ Beebe ME Davern DD McAlpine KT Call TH Rockwood, Med Care 2005 43 411 414 10.1097/01.mlr.0000156858.81146.0e 15778644
39. Response rate, speed, and completeness: a comparison of Internet-based and mail surveys. AD Truell JE Bartlett MW Alexander, Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2002 34 46 49 12060989
40. Internet and Society: A preliminary report. NH Nie L Erbring, Stanford Institutes for the Quantitative Study of Society SIQSS (The Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society). 2000 http://www.stanford.edu/group/ siqss/Press_Release/internetStudy.html
41. Computerized questionnaires and the quality of survey data. B Hanscom JD Lurie K Homa JN Weinstein, Spine 2002 27 1797 1801 10.1097/00007632-200208150- 00020 12195074
42. Electronic mail was not better than postal mail for surveying residents and faculty. EA Akl N Maroun RA Klocke V Montori HJ Schunemann, J Clin Epidemiol 2005 58 425 429 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.006 15862729
43. An evaluation of an online intervention to provide social support and health education. WG Hill C Weinert, Comput Inform Nurs 2004 22 282 288 10.1097/00024665-200409000-00008 15520598
44. Mode of delivery, but not questionnaire length, affected response in an epidemiological study of eating-disordered behavior. JM Mond B Rodgers PJ Hay C Owen PJ Beumont, J Clin Epidemiol 2004 57 1167 1171 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.02. 017 15567633
45. Respondent Burden: A Test of Some Common Assumptions. LM Sharp J Frankel, Public Opin Q 1983 47 36 53 10.1086/268765
46. Response rate to mailed epidemiologic questionnaires: a population-based randomized trial of variations in design and mailing routines. S Eaker R Bergstrom A Bergstrom HO Adami O Nyren, American Journal of Epidemiology 1998 147 74 82 9440402
47. Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: does questionnaire length matter? P Edwards I Roberts P Sandercock C Frost, Control Clin Trials 2004 25 31 52 10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.013 14980747
48. Factors impacting questionnaire response in a Dutch retrospective cohort study. C Ronckers C Land R Hayes P Verduijn LF van, Ann Epidemiol 2004 14 66 72 10.1016/S1047-2797(03)00123-6 14664782
49. Outcomes of and for diabetes education research. RE Glasgow, Diabetes Educ 1999 25 74 88 10.1177/014572179902500508 10711087
50. Putting Humpty Dumpty back together again: Reintegrating the Clinical and Behavioral Components in Diabetes Care and Education. MM Funnell RM Anderson, Diabetes Spectrum 1999 12 19 23
51. Healthy Canadians: A Federal Report on Comparable Health Indicators 2006. H Canada, Health Canada 2006 http://hc-sc.gc.ca/hcs-sss/pubs/system-regime/ 2006-fed-comp-indicat/2006-fed-comp-indicat-3_e.html#1
52. A pilot study of participation in faecal occult blood testing and screening colonoscopy after health education in Hong Kong. BC Wong AO Chan KW Wong CK Ching WM Wong S Tam KC Lai CK Chan MF Yuen SK Lam, Eur J Cancer Prev 2005 14 181 184 10.1097/00008469-200504000-00015 15785323
53. Why patients do not attend cardiac rehabilitation: role of intentions and illness beliefs. A Cooper G Lloyd J Weinman G Jackson, Heart 1999 82 234 236 10409543
54. Respondent inaccuracy. AG Woodside EJ Wilson, J A R 2002 42 7 19