Comparative study on auscultatory and oscillometric methods of ambulatory blood pressure measurements in adult patients

Blood Pressure Monitoring

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 29-35

  Genç, Yasemin ^a   Altunkan, Şekip ^b   Kilinç, Oǧuzhan ^b   Altunkan, Erkan ^b  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Metropol Medical Center   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; Auscultatory; Blood pressure measurement; Blood pressure variability; Oscillometric

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSCULTATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; BODY MASS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HEART ARRHYTHMIA; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSCILLOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ARM; AUSCULTATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, AMBULATORY; BODY MASS INDEX; BODY SIZE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; METHODS; MIDDLE AGED; OSCILLOMETRY;

EID: 38349008915     PISSN: 13595237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3282f13f20     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. O'Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Imai Y, Mallion JM, Mancia G, et al. European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring. European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens 2003; 21:821-848.
2. Parati G, Saul JP, Di Rienzo M, Mancia G. Spectral analysis of blood pressure and heart rate variability in evaluating cardiovascular regulation. A critical appraisal. Hypertension 1995; 25:1276-1286.
3. Sega R, Corrao G, Bombelli M, Beltrame L, Facchetti R, Grassi G, et al. Blood pressure variability and organ damage in a general population: results from the PAMELA study (Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni). Hypertension 2002; 39 (2 Pt 2):710-714.
4. O'Brien E, Fitzgerald D. The history of indirect blood pressure measurement. In: O'Brien E, O'Malley K, editors. Blood pressure measurement; in Birkenhager WH, Reid JL, series editors. Vol. 14. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publisher B.V; 1991. pp. 1-54.
5. Meyer-Sabellek WA. Non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure measurement. In: O'Brien E, O'Malley K, editors. Blood pressure measurement; in Birkenhager WH, Reid JL, series editors. Vol. 14. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publisher B.V; 1991. pp. 184-217.
6. O'Brien E, Waeber B, Parati G, Staessen J, Myers MG, on behalf of the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring. Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension. BMJ 2001; 322:531-536.
7. Ramsey M III. Noninvasive automatic determination of mean arterial blood pressure. Med Biol Eng Comput 1979; 17:11-18.
8. Pannarale G, Bebb G, Clark S, Sullivan A, Foster C, Coats AJS. Bias and variability in blood pressure measurement with ambulatory recorders. Hypertension 1993; 22:591-598.
9. Bonnafoux P. Auscultatory and oscillometric methods in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, advantages and limits: a technical point of view. Blood Press Monit 1996; 1:181-185.
10. Mee F, Atkins N, O'Brien E. Validation of the Nissei DS-240 ambulatory blood pressure measuring system as determined by the British Hypertension Society protocol. J Hum Hypertens 1994; 8:295.
11. Altunkan S, Iliman N, Altunkan E. Validation of the Nissei 250 ambulatory blood pressure monitoring devive according to the International Protocol. J Hypertens 2003; 21 (Suppl 4):S22.
12. Pickering TG, Pieper C. Methods of analysis of ambulatory blood pressure data. In: Pickering TG, editor. Ambulatory monitoring and blood pressure variability. London: Science Press Ltd, 34-42; 1991. pp. 16.1-16.14.
13. WHO Expert Committee. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. WHO Technical Report Series no. 854. Geneva: WHO; 1995.
14. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, et al. Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension 2005; 45:142-161.
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8:135-160.
16. Blank S,West J, Muller F, Pecker M, Laragh J, Pickering T. Characterization of auscultatory gaps with wideband external pulse recording. Hypertension 1991; 17:225-232.
17. Keavney B, Bird R, Caiazza A, Casadei B, Conway J. Measurement of blood pressure using the auscultatory and oscillometric methods in the same cuff deflation: validation and field trial of the A&D TM2421 monitor. J Hum Hypertens 2000; 14:573-579.
18. Fagugli RM, Vecchi L, Valente F, Santirosi P, Laviola MM. Comparison between oscillometric and auscultatory methods of ambulatory blood pressure measurement in hemodialysis patients. Clin Nephrol 2002; 57:283-288.
19. Dabl educational web site. http://www.dableducational.com. (Accessed October 2006).
20. O'Shea JC, Murphy MB. Factors confounding assessment of ambulatory blood pressure monitors, studied during formal evaluation of the Tycos Quiet-Trak. Am J Hypertens 1997; 10:175-180.
21. Wiinberg N, Raymond IE, Malmqvist BB, Svendson TL, Petersen LJ. A comparison between the oscillometric and the auscultatory methods for 24-hour blood pressure monitoring. Blood Press Monit 1996; 1:187-191.
22. Sander D, Kukla C, Klingelhofer J, Winbeck K, Conrad B. Relationship between circadian blood pressure patterns and progression of early carotid atherosclerosis: a 3-year follow-up study. Circulation 2000; 26:1536-1541.