Factors confounding assessment of ambulatory blood pressure monitors, studied during formal evaluation of the Tycos Quiet-Trak

American Journal of Hypertension

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 175-180

  Shea, J Conor ^a   Murphy, Michael B ^a  

^a MERCY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

Author keywords

ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; physical activity; Quiet Trak; validation protocol

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY MONITORING; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, AMBULATORY; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0031081815     PISSN: 08957061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-7061(96)00324-X     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. 1. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation: American National Standard for Electronic or Automated Sphygmomanometers. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, Arlington, VA, 1987.
2. 2. O'Brien E, Petrie JC, Littler WA, et al: The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of automated and semi-automated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems. J Hypertens 1990;8:607-619.
3. 3. White W, Berson A, Robbins C, et al: National Standard for Measurement of Resting and Ambulatory Blood Pressures With Automated Sphygmomanometers. Hypertension 1993;21:504-509.
4. 4. O'Brien E, Petrie JC, Littler WA, et al: The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens 1993;11(suppl 2):S43-S62.
5. 5. Gretler D, Carlson G, Montano A, Murphy M: Diurnal blood pressure variability and physical activity measured electronically and by diary. Am J Hypertens 1993;6:127-133.
6. 6. White W, Susser W, James G, et al: Multicentre Assessment of the Quiet-Trak ambulatory blood pressure recorder according to the 1992 AAMI guidelines. Am J Hypertens 1994;7:509-514.
7. 7. Conway J, Coats A, Bird R: Lisinopril and enalapril in hypertension: a comparative study using ambulatory monitoring. J Hum Hypertens 1990;4:235-239.
8. 8. McCormack P, Cox J, Marron J, et al: The antihypertensive efficacy of Ketanserin in the elderly evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure measurement. J Hum Hypertens 1990;4:565-570.
9. 9. Littler W, West J: Twenty-four hour action of ACE inhibitors. J Hum Hypertens 1990;4(suppl 4):13-16.
10. 10. Skoularigis J, Eitzman L, Davis J, et al: Nifedipine versus captopril in the management of moderate hypertension in black patients. Am J Hypertens 1994;7:440-447.
11. 11. Lacourciere Y, Lefebvre J, Poirier L, et al: Treatment of ambulatory hypertensives with nebivolol or hydrochlorothiazide alone or in combination. Am J Hypertension 1994;7:137-145.
12. 12. Miller S, Elam J, Graney M, Applegate W: Discrepancies in recording systolic blood pressure of elderly persons by ambulatory blood pressure monitor. Am J Hypertens 1992;5:16-21.