Health staff perception regarding quality of delivered information to inpatients

International Journal for Quality in Health Care

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 13-21

  Duclos, Antoine ^a   Gillaizeau, Florence ^a,b,c   Colombet, Isabelle ^a,b,c   Coste, Joel ^b,d   Durieux, Pierre ^a,b,c  

^a HÔPITAL EUROPÉEN GEORGES POMPIDOU   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^c CENTRE DE RECHERCHE DES CORDELIERS   (France)

^d NONE   (France)

Author keywords

Accreditation; Health personnel; Quality of health care; Questionnaires; Self assessment

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; ACCURACY; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; COMPETENCE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FRANCE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEDICAL STAFF; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SELF EVALUATION; STANDARD;

ACCREDITATION; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HOSPITALS; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; MALE; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; MIDDLE AGED; PARIS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 38149096283     PISSN: 13534505     EISSN: 14643677     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm063     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Shaw C. How can hospital performance be measured and monitored? [The World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe website]. August, 2003. http://www.euro.who.int/document/e82975.pdf (12 May 2007, date last accessed).
2. Shaw CD. Evaluating accreditation. Int J Qual Health Care 2003; 15:455-6.
3. Shaw CD. Accreditation in European health care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2006;32:266-75.
4. Black N. Evidence based policy: Proceed with care. BMJ 2001;323 275-9.
5. Rockwell DA, Pelletier LR, Donnelly W. The cost of accreditation: One hospital's experience. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1993;44 151-5.
6. Sutherland K, Leatherman S. Regulation and quality improvement: A review of the evidence [The Health Foundation website]. October 2006. http://www.health.org.uk/publications/research_reports/regulation.hmtl (12 May 2007, date last accessed).
7. Pomey MP, Francois P, Contandriopoulos AP et al. Paradoxes of French accreditation. Qual Saf Health Care 2005;14:51-5.
8. Shekelle PG. Why don't. physicians enthusiastically support quality improvement programs? Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:6.
9. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M et al. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: A systematic review. JAMA 2006;296:1094-102.
10. Zandbelt LC, Smets EM, Oort FJ et al. Satisfaction with the outpatient encounter: A comparison of patients' and physicians' views. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19:1088-95.
11. Rashid A, Forman W, Jagger C et al. Consultations in general practice: A comparison of patients' and doctors' satisfaction. BMJ 1989;299:1015-6.
12. Jung HP, Wensing M, Olesen F et al. Comparison of paients' and general practitioners' evaluations of general practice care. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:315-9.
13. Hall JA, Stein TS, Roter DL et al. Inaccuracies in physicians' perceptions of their patients. Med Care 1999;37:1164-8.
14. Nadolski GJ, Bell MA, Brewer BB et al. Evaluating the quality of interaction between medical students and nurses in a large teaching hospital. BMC Med Educ 2006;6:23.
15. McMahan EM, Hoffman K, McGee GW. Physician-nurse relationships in clinical settings: A review, and critique of the literature, 1966-1992. Med Care Rev 1994;51:83-112.
16. Durieux P, Bissery A, Dubois S et al. Comparison of health care professionals' self-assessments of standards of care and patients' opinions on the care they received in hospital: Observational study. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:198-202.
17. Agence Nationale d'Accréditation et d'Evaluation en Santé (ANAES), Accreditation Department: Accreditation Manual for Health Care Organisation [The Haute Autorite en Santé (HAS) website]. February, 1999. http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/types/FileDocument/ doXiti.jsp?id=c_428599 (12 May 2007, date last accessed).
18. Salomon L, Gasquet I, Mesbah M et al. Construction of a scale measuring inpatients' opinion on quality of care. Int J Qual Health Care 1999;11:507-16.
19. Manly BJF. Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer. London: Chapman and Hall, 1986.
20. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991.
21. Hox JJ. Multilevel Analysis; Techniques And Applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002.
22. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW. Hierarchical Linear Models: Application And Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1992.
23. Moret I, Rochedreux A, Balleteau F et al. Information for the patient in hospitals: The implicit shared role among professionals. Presse Med 2004;33:1431-6.
24. Davis S, Kristjanson LJ, Blight J. Communicating with families of patients in an acute hospital with advanced cancer: Problems and strategies identified by nurses. Cancer Nurs 2003;26:337-45.
25. Tzeng HM, Ketefian S. The relationship between nurses' job satisfaction and inpatient satisfaction: An exploratory study in a Taiwan teaching hospital. J Nurs Care Qual 2002;16:39-49.
26. Moret L, Tequi B, Lombrail P. Should self-asessment methods be used to measure compliance with handwashing recommendations? A study carried out in a French university hospital. Am J Infect Control 2004;32 384-90.
27. Levy CR, Ely EW, Payne K et al. Quality of dying and death in two medical ICUs: Perceptions of family and clinicians. Chest 2005; 127:1775-83.
28. Frick S, Uehlinger DE, Zuercher Zenklusen RM. Medical futility: predicting outcome of intensive care unit patients by nurses and doctors - a prospective comparative study. Crit Care Med 2003;31 456-61.
29. Breen CM, Abernethy AP, Abbott KH et al. Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:283-9.
30. Dans PE, Weiner JP, Otter SE. Peer review organizations. Promises and potential pitfalls. N Engl J Med 1985;313:1131-7.
31. Caplan RA, Posner KL, Cheney FW. Effect of outcome on physician judgments of approptiateness of care. JAMA 1991;265:1957-60.
32. Weingart SN, Davis RB, Palmer RH et al. Discrepancies between explicit and implicit review: Physician and nurse assessments of complications and quality. Health Serv Res 2002;37:483-98.
33. Ashton CM, Kuykendall DH, Johnson ML et al. An empirical assessment of the validity of explicit and implicit process-of-care criteria for quality assessment. Med Care 1999;37:798-808
34. Giraud A. Accreditation and the quality movement in France. Qual Health Care 2001;10:111-6.
35. Wensing M, Wollersheim H, Grol P, Organizational interventions to implement improvements in patient care: A structured review of reviews. Implement Sci 2006;1:2.