Quality models of online learning community systems: Exploration, evaluation and exploitation

User-Centered Design of Online Learning Communities

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 71-100

  Law, Effie Lai Chong ^a,b   Hvannberg, Ebba Thora ^c  

^a SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ICELAND   (Iceland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38149074324     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-358-6.ch004     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Andre, T. S., Hartson, H. R., Belz, S. M., & McCreary, F. A. (2001). The user action framework. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54, 107-136.
2. Arthur, W. B. (2005). The changing character of technology. In O. D. Jonsson & E. H. Huijens (Eds.), Technology in society-Society in technology (pp. 191-200). University of Iceland Press.
3. Bannon, L. J. (1997). Dwelling in the "great divide": The case of HCI and CSCW. In G. C. Bowker, S. L. Star, W. Turner, & L. Gasser (Eds.), Social science, technical systems, and cooperative work: Beyond the great divide.(pp. 355-378). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Barab, S., Kling, R., & Gray, J. H. (2004). Designing virtual communities in service of learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bevan, N. (2001). International standards for HCI and usability. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 55(4), 533-552.
6. Blandford, A., & Furniss, D. (2005). DiCoT: A methodology for applying distributed cognition to the design of team working systems. Proceedings of DSVIS 2005 (LNCS).
7. Blythe, M., Hassenzahl, M., & Wright, P.C. (2004). More funology. Interactions, 11(1), 36-37.
8. th Conference on Human Factors and the Web, Madison, WI.
9. Chillarege, R. et al. (1992). Orthogonal defect classification. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 18(11).
10. Corritorea, C. L., Krachera, B., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2003). Online trust: Concepts, evolving themes, a model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 737-758.
11. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
12. Dewey, J. (1925/1981). Experience and nature. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925-1953 (Vol.1, pp. 1-326). Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
13. Dewey, J. (1933/1986). How we think. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925-1953 (Vol. 8, pp. 105-352). Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
14. Earthy, J., Jones, B. S., & Bevan, N. (2001). The improvement of human-centered processes-Facing the challenge and reaping the benefit of ISO 13407. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55, 553-585.
15. Elliot, M., & Kling, R. (1997). Organizational usability of digital libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(11), 1023-1025.
16. Firesmith, D. (2003). Using quality models to engineer quality requirements. Journal of Object Technology, 2(5), 67-75.
17. Fogg, B. J. et al. (2001). What makes a Web site credible? A report on a large quantitative study. Proceedings of CHI 2001 (pp. 61-68). New York: ACM Press.
18. th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, Northamptonshire, UK.
19. Grudin, J. (2004). Crossing the divide. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 11(1), 1-25.
20. Kelly, D., & Cool, C. (2002). The effects of topic familiarity on information search behavior. Proceedings of the Second JCDL (pp. 74-75).
21. Hvannberg, E. T. (in press). Experience research. In E. Aarts & J. Encarnaçao (Eds.), True visions: Tales on the realization of ambient intelligence. Springer-Verlag.
22. Hvannberg, E. T., & Law, E. L.-C. (2003, September 5-9). The classification of usability problems (CUP) scheme. Proceedings of INTERACT 2003, Zurich, Switzerland.
23. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Lewis, J. R. (1995). IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7(1), 57-78.
25. McCall, J., Richards, P., & Walters, G. (1977). Factors in software quality. Volumes 1, 2, & 3. AD/A-049-015/055, National Technology Information Service, Springfield, VA.
26. McCarthy, J., & Wright, P. (2004). Technology as experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1994). Groups interacting with technology. New York: Sage.
28. Montero, F., González, P., Lozano, M., & Vanderdonckt, J. (2005). Quality models for automated evaluation of Web site usability and accessibility. Proceedings of the International COST294 Workshop on User Interface Quality Models (pp.37-43), Rome, Italy.
29. Mumford, E., & Beekman, G.J. (1994). Tools for change and progress: A socio-technical approach to business re-engineering process. Leiden, The Netherlands: CSG Publications.
30. Nardi, B. A. (1994). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In A. B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69-102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Olsina, L., Lafuente, G., & Rossi, G. (2001). Specifying quality characteristics and attributes for Web sites. Proceedings of Web Engineering: Managing Diversity and Complexity of Web Application Development (LNCS 2016, pp. 266-277). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
32. Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
33. Rheingold, H. (1994). The virtual community. London: MIT Press.
34. Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. (2002). Usability engineering: Scenario-based development of human-computer interaction. San Francisco: Morgan-Kaufman.
35. Salomon, G. (Ed.). (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
37. Schulte, M., & Huber, O. (2003). Information search in the lab and on the Web. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35(2), 227-235.
38. Simon, B. (2001). E-learning an Hochschulen: Erfolgsfaktoren und Gestaltungsräume von Wissensmedien. Lohmar/Köln: Eul-Verlag.
39. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated action: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Svenonius, E. (2000). Intellectual foundation of information organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Vanderdonckt, J., Law, E. L.-C., & Hvannberg, E. T. (2005, September 12-13). Proceedings of the International COST294 Workshop on User Interface Quality Models, Rome, Italy.
42. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Wenger, E. (2001). Supporting communities of practice: A survey of communityoriented technologies. Retrieved from http://www.ewenger.tech/com