Persuasive effects of embodied conversational agent teams

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4552 LNCS, Issue PART 3, 2007, Pages 176-185

  Nguyen, Hien ^a   Masthoff, Judith ^a   Edwards, Pete ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MESSAGE PASSING;

CONVERSATIONAL AGENTS; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;

INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 38149073371     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-73110-8_19     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Andre, E., Rist, T., van Mulken, S., Kiesen, M., Baldes, S.: The automated design of believable dialogues for animated presentation teams. In: Cassell, J., Prevost, S., Sullivan, J., Churchill, E. (eds.) Embodied Conversational Agents, pp. 220-255. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
2. Aronson, E.: The social animal, Worth (2004)
3. Baylor, A.L., Rosenberg-Kima, R.B., Plant, E.A.: Interface Agents as Social Models: The Impact of Appearance on Females' Attitude Toward Engineering. CHI (2006)
4. Bickmore, T.: Methodological review: Health dialog systems for patients and consumers. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 39(5), 556-571 (2006)
5. Cialdini, R.: Influence: science and practice. Scott, Foresman (1988)
6. Craig, S.D., Gholson, B., Garzon, M.H., Hu, X., Marks, W., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Lu, Z.: Autor tutor and otto tudor. AIED-Workshop on Animated and Personified Pedagogical Agents. Le Mans, France, pp. 25-30 (1999)
7. Dehn, D.M., van Mulken, S.: The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52, 1-22 (2000)
8. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1975)
9. Fogg, B.J., Marshall, J., Kameda, T., Solomon, J., Rangnekar, A., Boyd, J., Brown, B.: Web Credibility Research: A Method for Online Experiments and Early Study Results. In: CHI 2001, pp. 295-296 (2001)
10. Fogg, B.J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D., Marable, L., Stanford, J., Tauber, E.: How do users evaluate the credibility of websites?: A study with over 2500 participants. Designing for user experiences, pp. 1-15 (2003)
11. Miller, G.R.: On being persuaded: Some basic distinctions. In: Roloff, M.E., Miller, G.R. (eds.): Persuasion: New directions in theory and research, pp. 11-28, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA (1980)
12. Nass, C., Reeves, B., Leshner, G.: Technology and roles: A tale of two TVs. Journal of Communication 46(2), 121-128 (1996)
13. Nguyen, H., Masthoff, J.: Is it me or is it what I say? Source image and persuasion (Submitted to conference)
14. O'Keefe, J.D.: Persuasion: theory and research. Sage, Newbury Park, CA (1990)
15. Pew: Internet health resources, Washington, DC, Pew Internet and American Life Project (2003)
16. Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, MA., McCarthy, J.D.: Shiny happy people building trust? Photos on e-commerce websites and consumer trust. In: Proceedings of CHI 2003. pp. 121-128 (2003)
17. Stiff, J.B., Mongeau, P.A.: Persuasive Communication, 2nd edn. Guilford press (2002)
18. de Vries, H., Brug, J.: Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health promoting behaviours: Introduction to a new approach, Patient Educ Couns, vol. 36, pp. 99-105 (1999)
19. de Vries, P.: Social presence as a conduit to the social dimensions of online trust. In: Persuasive Technology Conference, pp. 55-59 (2006)