Human and Chimpanzee Face Recognition in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Role of Exposure and Impact on Categorical Perception

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 121, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1145-1155

  Martin Malivel, Julie ^a   Okada, Kazunori ^b  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

cross species face recognition; exposure; nonconspecifics; other species effects; species specific

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CHIMPANZEE; EXPOSURE; FACIES; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MONKEY; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NONHUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION; SIMULATION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMANS; PAN TROGLODYTES; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 38149037982     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.121.6.1145     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Beale J.M., and Keil F.C. Categorical effects in the perception of faces. Cognition 57 (1995) 217-239
2. Biederman I., and Kalocsai P. Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences 352 (1997) 1203-1219
3. Boysen S.T., and Berntson G.G. Cardiac correlates of individual recognition in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology 100 (1986) 321-324
4. Boysen S.T., and Berntson G.G. Conspecific recognition in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): Cardiac responses to significant others. Journal of Comparative Psychology 103 (1989) 215-220
5. Bruce C. Face recognition by monkeys: Absence of an inversion effect. Neuropsychologia 20 (1982) 515-521
6. Campbell, R., Pascalis, O., Coleman, M., Wallace, S. B., & Benson, P. J. (1997). Are faces of different species perceived categorically by human observers? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 264, 1429-1434.
7. de Schonen S., and Mathivet E. First come first served: A scenario about development of hemispheric specialization in face recognition during infancy. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology 9 (1989) 3-44
8. Diamond R., and Carey S. Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115 (1986) 107-117
9. Ehret G. Categorical perception of sound signals: Facts and hypotheses from animal studies. In: Harnad S. (Ed). Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition (1987), Cambridge University Press, New York 301-331
10. Fujita K. Species recognition by five macaque monkeys. Primates 28 (1987) 353-366
11. Fujita K. Species preference by infant macaques with controlled social experience. International Journal of Primatology 11 (1990) 553-573
12. Fujita K. Development of visual preference for closely related species by infant and juvenile macaques with restricted social experience. Primates 34 (1993) 141-150
13. Gauthier I., and Bukach C. Should we reject the expertise hypothesis?. Cognition 103 (2007) 322-330
14. Gauthier I., and Tarr M.J. Becoming a "Greeble" expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research 37 (1997) 1673-1682
15. Gauthier I., Tarr M.J., Anderson A.W., Skudlarski P., and Gore J.C. Activation of the middle fusiform "face area" increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience 2 (1999) 568-573
16. Gauthier I., Williams P., Tarr M.J., and Tanaka J. Training "greeble" experts: A framework for studying expert object recognition processes. Vision Research 38 (1998) 2401-2428
17. Goldstein A.G., and Chance J.E. Effects of training on Japanese face recognition-Reduction of the other-race effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (1985) 211-214
18. Harnad S. Psychophysical and cognitive aspects of categorical perception: A critical overview. In: Harnad S. (Ed). Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition (1987), Cambridge University Press, New York
19. Humphrey N.K. Species and individuals in the perceptual world of monkeys. Perception 3 (1974) 105-114
20. Johnson M.H., Dziurawiec S., Ellis H., and Morton J. Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition 40 (1991) 1-19
21. Keating C.F., and Keating E.G. Monkeys and mug shots: Cues used by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to recognize a human face. Journal of Comparative Psychology 107 (1993) 131-139
22. Kendrick K.M., Hinton M.R., Atkins K., Haupt M.A., and Skinner J.D. Mothers determine sexual preferences. Nature 395 (1998) 229-230
23. Kiani R., Esteky H., and Tanaka K. Differences in onset latency of macaque inferotemporal neural responses to primate and non-primate faces. Journal of Neurophysiology 94 (2005) 1587-1596
24. Kobatake E., Wang G., and Tanaka K. Effects of shape-discrimination training on the selectivity of inferotemporal cells in adult monkeys. Journal of Neurophysiology 80 (1998) 324-330
25. Koch C. Biophysics of computation: Information processing in single neurons (1999), Oxford University Press, New York
26. Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F. M., & Liu, H. M. (2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100, 9096-9101.
27. Levin D.T., and Beale J.M. Categorical perception occurs in newly learned faces, other-race faces, and inverted faces. Perception and Psychophysics 62 (2000) 386-401
28. Lewkowicz, D. J., & Ghazanfar, A. A. (2006). The decline of cross-species intersensory perception in human infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103, 6771-6774.
29. Logothetis N.K., Pauls J., and Poggio T. Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Current Biology 5 (1995) 552-563
30. Martin-Malivel J., and Fagot J. Perception of pictorial human faces by baboons: Effects of stimulus orientation on discrimination performance. Animal Learning & Behavior 29 (2001) 10-20
31. McCarthy G., Puce A., Belger A., and Allison T. Electrophysiological studies of human face perception: II. Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 9 (1999) 431-444
32. McKone E., Kanwisher N., and Duchaine B.C. Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?. Trends in Cognitive Science 11 (2007) 8-15
33. McKone E., and Robbins R. The evidence rejects the expertise hypothesis: Reply to Gauthier & Bukach. Cognition 103 (2007) 331-336
34. Morris R.D., and Hopkins W.D. Perception of human chimeric faces by chimpanzees: Evidence for a right hemisphere advantage. Brain and Cognition 21 (1993) 111-122
35. Nederhouser, M., Mangini, M. C., Biederman, I., & Okada, K. (2002, November). Matching face-like objects is invariant to differences in direction of contrast. Poster session presented at the 10th Annual Workshop on Object Perception and Memory, Kansas City, MO.
36. Nederhouser M., Mangini M.C., Biederman I., and Okada K. Invariance to contrast inversion when matching objects with face-like surface structure and pigmentation. Journal of Vision 3 9 (2003) 93a Abstract No. 93. doi:10.1167/3.9.93
37. Okada K., Steffens J., Maurer T., Hong H., Elagin E., Neven H., and von der Malsburg C. The Bochum/USC Face Recognition System and how it fared in the FERET Phase III test. In: Wechsler H., Phillips P.J., Bruce V., Fogelman Soulie F., and Huang T.S. (Eds). Face recognition: From theory to applications (1998), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany 186-205
38. O'Toole A.J., Deffenbacher K.A., Valentin D., and Abdi H. Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect. Memory & Cognition 22 (1994) 208-224
39. Parr L.A., and de Waal F.B.M. Visual kin recognition in chimpanzees. Nature 399 (1999) 647-648
40. Parr L.A., Dove T., and Hopkins W.D. Why faces may be special: Evidence of the inversion effect in chimpanzees. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10 (1998) 615-622
41. Parr L.A., and Heintz M. The perception of unfamiliar faces and houses by chimpanzees: Influence of rotation angle. Perception 35 (2006) 1473-1483
42. Parr L.A., Heintz M., and Akamagwuna U. Three studies on configural face processing by chimpanzees. Brain Cognition 62 (2006) 30-42
43. Parr L.A., Winslow J.T., and Hopkins W.D. Is the inversion effect in rhesus monkeys face specific?. Animal Cognition 2 (1999) 123-129
44. Parr L.A., Winslow J.T., Hopkins W.D., and de Waal F.B.M. Recognizing facial cues: Individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Comparative Psychology 114 (2000) 47-60
45. Pascalis O., and Bachevalier J. Face recognition in primates: A cross-species study. Behavioural Processes 43 (1998) 87-96
46. Pascalis O., de Haan M., and Nelson C.A. Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life?. Science 296 (2002) 1321-1323
47. Pascalis, O., Scott, L. S., Kelly, D. J., Shannon, R. W., Nicholson, E., Coleman, M., et al. (2005). Plasticity of face processing in infancy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102, 5297-5300.
48. Peirce J.W., Leigh A.E., daCosta A.P., and Kendrick K.M. Human face recognition in sheep: Lack of configurational coding and right hemisphere advantage. Behavioural Processes 55 (2001) 13-26
49. Peirce J.W., Leigh A.E., and Kendrick K.M. Configurational coding, familiarity and the right hemisphere advantage for face recognition in sheep. Neuropsychologia 38 (2000) 475-483
50. Phelps M.T., and Roberts W.A. Memory for pictures of upright and inverted primate faces in humans (Homo sapiens), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus), and pigeons (Columba livia). Journal of Comparative Psychology 108 (1994) 114-125
51. Phillips P.J., Moon H., Rizvi S.A., and Rauss P.J. The FERET evaluation methodology for face recognition algorithms. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22 (2000) 1090-1104
52. Phillips P.J., Wechsler H., Huang J., and Rauss P.J. The FERET database and evaluation procedure for face recognition algorithms. Image and Vision Computing 16 (1998) 295-306
53. Robbins R., and McKone E. No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks. Cognition 103 (2007) 34-79
54. Rousselet G.A., Macé M.J.-M., and Fabre-Thorpe M. Animal and human faces in natural scenes: How specific to human faces is the N170 ERP component?. Journal of Vision 4 (2004) 13-21
55. Sackett G.P. Monkeys reared in isolation with pictures as visual input: Evidence for an innate releasing mechanism. Science 154 (1966) 1468-1473
56. Sackett G. Effects of rearing experiences on development in rhesus monkey. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 28 (1970) 422
57. Sangrigoli S., Pallier C., Argenti A.M., Ventureyra V.A., and de Schonen S. Reversibility of the other-race effect in face recognition during childhood. Psychological Science 16 (2005) 440-444
58. Stevenage S.V. Which twin are you? A demonstration of induced categorical perception of identical twin faces. British Journal of Psychology 89 (1998) 39-57
59. Tanaka M. Visual preference by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) for photos of primates measured by a free choice-order task: Implication for influence of social experience. Primates 44 (2003) 157-165
60. Tomonaga M. How laboratory-raised Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) perceive rotated photographs of monkeys-evidence for an inversion effect in face perception. Primates 35 (1994) 155-165
61. Tomonaga M. Inversion effect in perception of human faces in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Primates 40 (1999) 417-438
62. Tomonaga M., Itakura S., and Matsuzawa T. Superiority of conspecific faces and reduced inversion effect in face perception by a chimpanzee. Folia Primatologica 61 (1993) 110-114
63. Wright A.A., and Roberts W.A. Monkey and human face perception: Inversion effects for human faces but not for monkey faces or scenes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8 (1996) 278-290