Configurational coding, familiarity and the right hemisphere advantage for face recognition in sheep

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 475-483

  Peirce, J W ^a   Leigh, A E ^a   Kendrick, K M ^a  

^a BABRAHAM INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Asymmetry; Chimeric; Expertise; Face processing; Hemispheric lateralisation; Internal features

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; LEARNING; NONHUMAN; RECOGNITION; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SHEEP; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ANIMALS; CUES; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FACE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GENES, FOS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; MAZE LEARNING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SHEEP; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033956246     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00088-3     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Assal G., Favre C., Anderes J.P. [Nonrecognition of familiar animals by a farmer. Zooagnosia or prosopagnosia for animals]. Revue Neurologie. 140:1984;580-584.
2. Bornstein B. Prosopagnosia. Halpern L. Problems of dynamic neurology. 1963;Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem.
3. Bornstein B., Sroka H., Munitz H. Prosopagnosia with animal face agnosia. Cortex. 5:1969;164-169.
4. Broman M. Reaction-time differences between the left and right hemispheres for face and letter discrimination in children and adults. Cortex. 14:1978;578-591.
5. Bruyer R., Laterre C., Seron X., Feyereisen P., Strypstein E., Pierrard E., et al. A case of prosopagnosia with some preserved covert remembrance of familiar faces. Brain and Cognition. 2:1983;257-284.
6. Corballis M.C. Cerebral asymmetry: motoring on. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2:1998;152-157.
7. De Renzi E., Perani D., Carlesimo G.A., Silveri M.C., Fazio F. Prosopagnosia can be associated with damage confined to the right-hemisphere - an MRI and PET study and a review of the literature. Neuropsychologia. 32:1994;893-902.
8. Diamond R., Carey S. Why faces are and are not special - an effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology - General. 115:1986;107-117.
9. Dittrich W. Representation of faces in longtailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Ethology. 85:1990;265-278.
10. Ellis H.D., Shepherd J.W. Recognition of upright and inverted faces presented in the left and right visual fields. Cortex. 11:1975;3-7.
11. Ellis H.D., Shepherd J.W., Davies G.M. Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception. 8:1979;431-439.
12. Hamilton C.R. An assessment of hemispheric specialization in monkeys. Annals of the New York Academy of Science. 299:1977;222-232.
13. Hamilton C.R. Lateralization for orientation in split-brain monkeys. Behavioural Brain Research. 10:1983;399-403.
14. Hamilton C.R., Vermeire B.A. Complementary hemispheric-specialization in monkeys. Science. 242:1988;1691-1694.
15. Hilliard R.D. Hemispheric laterality effects on a facial recognition task in normal subjects. Cortex. 9:1973;246-258.
16. Kanwisher N., Chun M.M., McDermott J., Ledden P.J. Functional imaging of human visual recognition. Cognitive Brain Research. 5:1996;55-67.
17. Kendrick K.M., Atkins K., Hinton M.R., Broad K.D., Fabrenys C., Keverne B. Facial and vocal discrimination in sheep. Animal Behaviour. 49:1995;1665-1676.
18. Kendrick K.M., Atkins K., Hinton M.R., Heavens P., Keverne B. Are faces special for sheep - evidence from facial and object discrimination-learning tests showing effects of inversion and social familiarity. Behavioural Processes. 38:1996;19-35.
19. Kendrick KM, Mimmack ML, da Costa APC, Broad KD. C-fos mapping of neural substrates involved in face discrimination by sheep. Society for Neuroscience (Abstract) , 1998.
20. Levine S.C., Levy J. Perceptual asymmetry for chimeric faces across the life span. Brain and Cognition. 5:1986;291-306.
21. Levy J., Heller W., Banich M.T., Burton L.A. Asymmetry of perception in free viewing of chimeric faces. Brain and Cognition. 2:1983;404-419.
22. Levy J., Trevarthen C., Sperry R.W. Perception of bilateral chimeric figures following hemispheric disconnection. Brain. 95:1972;61-78.
23. McNeil J.E., Warrington E.K. Prosopagnosia - a face-specific disorder. Quarterly Journal Of Experimental Psychology Section A - Human Experimental Psychology. 46:1993;1-10.
24. Morris R.D., Hopkins W.D. Perception of human chimeric faces by chimpanzees - evidence for a right-hemisphere advantage. Brain and Cognition. 21:1993;111-122.
25. Overman W.H., Doty R.W. Hemispheric specialization displayed by man but not macaques for analysis of faces. Neuropsychologia. 20:1982;113-128.
26. Parr L.A., Dove T., Hopkins W.D. Why faces may be special: evidence of the inversion effect in chimpanzees. Journal Of Cognitive Neuroscience. 10:1998;615-622.
27. Perrett D.I., Mistlin A.J., Chitty A.J., Smith P.J., Potter D.D., Broennimann R., et al. Specialized face processing and hemispheric-asymmetry in man and monkey - evidence from single unit and reaction-time studies. Behavioural Brain Research. 29:1988;245-258.
28. Phelps M.T., Roberts W.A. Memory for pictures of upright and inverted primate faces in humans (Homo sapiens), Squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus), and pigeons (Columba livia). Journal of Comparative Psychology. 108:1994;114-125.
29. Puce A., Allison T., Gore J.C., McCarthy G. Face-sensitive regions in human extrastriate cortex studied by functional MRI. Journal of Neurophysiology. 74:1995;1192-1199.
30. Rakover S.S., Teucher B. Facial inversion effects: parts and whole relationship. Perception & Psychophysics. 59:1997;752-761.
31. Rhodes G. Configural coding, expertise, and the right hemisphere advantage for face recognition. Brain and Cognition. 22:1993;19-41.
32. Rock I. The perception of disoriented figures. Scientific American. 230:1974;78-85.
33. Sergent J., Bindra D. Differential hemispheric processing of faces - methodological considerations and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin. 89:1981;541-554.
34. Sergent J., Signoret J.L. Functional and anatomical decomposition of face processing - evidence from prosopagnosia and PET study of normal subjects. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society of London Series B - Biological Sciences. 335:1992;55-62.
35. Swithenby S.J., Brautigam S., Bailey A.J., Hari R., Tesche C.D. Processing of faces in the human brain: a multi-task MEG study. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 25:1997;61.
36. Vaid J., Singh M. Asymmetries in the perception of facial affect - is there an influence of reading habits. Neuropsychologia. 27:1989;1277-1287.
37. Wright A.A., Roberts W.A. Monkey and human face perception: inversion effects for human faces but not for monkey faces or scenes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 8:1996;278-290.
38. Yin R.K. Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 81:1969;141-145.
39. Yin R.K. Face recognition by brain-injured patients: a dissociable ability? Neuropsychologia. 8:1970;395-402.
40. Young A.W., Ellis H.D. An experimental investigation of developmental differences in ability to recognise faces presented to the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia. 14:1976;495-498.
41. Young A.W., Hay D.C., Mcweeny K.H., Flude B.M., Ellis A.W. Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features. Perception. 14:1985;737-746.