Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: A retrospective study

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 987-994

  Krennmair, Gerald ^a,b   Krainhöfner, Martin ^a   Piehslinger, Eva ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b NONE   (Austria)

Author keywords

Edentulous mandible; Implant supported overdentures; Milled bar; Prosthodontic maintenance

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS; SURVIVAL; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

AGED; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, OVERLAY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 38149027233     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Brånemark P-I, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw: Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1977; 11(suppl 16):1-132.
2. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants. A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
3. Brånemark P-I, Svensson B, van Steenberghe D. Ten-year survival rates for fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Brånemark in full edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:227-231.
4. Eliasson A, Palmqvist S, Svenson B, Sondell K. Five-year results with fixed complete-arch mandibular prostheses supported by 4 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:505-510.
5. Kastenbaum F, Lewis S, Naert I, Palmqvist C. The EsthetiCone abutment: Three-year of a prospective multicenter investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:178-184.
6. Burns OR. Mandibular implant overdenture treatment: Consensus and controversy. J Prosthodont 2000;9:37-46.
7. Schmitt A, Zarb GA. The notion of implant-supported overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 1998,79:60-65.
8. Naert IE, Hooghe M, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D. The reliability of implant-retained hinging overdentures for the fully edentulous mandible. An up to 9-year longitudinal study. Clin Oral Investig 1997;1:119-124.
9. Batenburg RH, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, van Oort RP, Boering G. Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ, or ITI implants. A prospective comparative preliminary study: One year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:374-383.
10. Meijer HJ, Batenburg RH, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A. Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: A 5-year prospective study. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:522-526.
11. Sadowsky SJ. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:468-473.
12. Galindo DF. The implant-supported milled-bar mandibular overdenture. J Prosthodont 2001;10:46-51.
13. Sadowsky SJ. The implant-supported prosthesis for the edentulous arch: Design considerations. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:28-33.
14. Sadan A, Rogers WA. The milled implant-supported prosthesis: A treatment alternative for the edentulous mandible. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997;9:315-326.
15. Engstrand P, Grondahl K, Ohrnell LO, Nilsson P, Nannmark U, Brånemark PI. Prospective follow-up study of 95 patients with edentulous mandibles treated according to the Brånemark Novum concept. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:3-10.
16. Popper HA, Popper MJ, Popper JP. The Brånemark Novum protocol: Description of the treatment procedure and clinical pilot study of 11 cases. Int J Periodontics Resorative Dent 2003;23:459-465.
17. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdenture. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec, May 24-25, 2002. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:601-602.
18. van Kampen F, Cune M, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: An in vivo comparison after 3 month of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:720-726.
19. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, van Steenberghe D. A 5-year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:195-202.
20. MacEntee MI, Walton JN, Glick N. A clinical trial of patients satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: Three-year results. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:28-37.
21. Walton JN, MacEntee MI. A prospective study on the maintenance of implant prostheses in private practice. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:453-458.
22. Payne AGT, Solomons YF. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: A prospective evaluation of the burden prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:246-253.
23. Payne AGT, Solomons YF. The prosthodontic maintenance requirements of mandibular mucosa- and implant-supported overdentures: A review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:238-243.
24. Visser A, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ, Batenburg RH, Vissink A. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants. A 5-year prospective study. Cin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:19-25.
25. Batenburg RH, Raghoebar GM, van Oort RP, Heijdenrijk K, Boering G. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosteal implants. A prospective, comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;27:435-439.
26. Kreisler M, Behneke N, Behneke A, d'Hoedt B. Residual ridge resorption in the edentulous maxilla in patients with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: An 8-year retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:295-300.
27. Wright PS, Glantz PO, Randow K, Watson RM.The effect of fixed and removable implant-stabilized prostheses on posterior mandibular residual ridge resorption. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:169-174.
28. Hebel KS, Galindo D, Gajjar RC. Implant position record and implant position cast: Minimizing errors, procedures and patients visits in the fabrication of the milled-bar prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:107-116.
29. Tipton PA. The milled bar-retained removable bridge implant-supported prosthesis: A treatment alternative for the edentulous maxilla. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002;14:208-216.
30. McAlarney ME, Stavropoulos DN. Determination of cantilever length-anterior-posterior spread ratio assuming failure criteria to be the compromise of the prosthesis retaining screw-prosthesis joint. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11: 331-339.
31. English CE. Bar patterns in implant prosthodontics. Implant Dent 1994;3:217-229.
32. Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schürch E, Lang N. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol and Immunol 1987;2:145-151.
33. Silness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnanacy II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal conditions. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22:121-135.
34. Meijer HJ, Steen WH, Bosman F. Standardized radiographs of the alveolar crest around implants in the mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:318-321.
35. Zechner W, Watzak G, Gahleitner A, Busenlechner D, Tepper G, Watzek G. Rotational panoramic versus intraoral rectangular radiographs for evaluation of peri-implant bone loss in the anterior atrophic mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;6:873-878.
36. Batenburg RH, Meijer HJ, Geraets WG, van der Stell PF. Radiographic assessment of changes in marginal bone around endosseous implants supporting mandibular overdentures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:221-224.
37. Chaytor DV. Clinical criteria for detecting implant success: Bone. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:145-152.
38. Gomez-Roman G, Axmann D, d'Hoedt B, Schulte W. Eine Methode zur quantitativen Erfassung und statistischen Auswertung des periimplantären Knochenabbaues [in German]. Stomatologie 1995;92:463-471.
39. Buser D, von Arx T, ten Bruggenkate C, Weingart D. Basic surgical principles with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:59-68.
40. Buser D, Brägger U, Lang NP, Nyman S. Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1:22-32.
41. Roynesdal AK, Ambjornsen E, Haanaes HR. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandible: A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:543-548.
42. Roynesdal AK, Ambjornsen E, Stovne S, Haanaes HR. A comparative clinical study of three different endosseous implants in edentulous mandibles. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:500-505.
43. Zechner W, Trinkl N, Watzak G, et al. Radiologic follow-up of periimplant bone loss around machine-surfaced and rough-surfaced interforaminal implants in the mandible functionally loaded for 3 to 7 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:216-221.
44. Carlsson GE, Lindquist LW, Jemt T. Long-term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patient. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:295-302.
45. Hartman GA, Cochran DL. Initial implant position determines the magnitude of crestal bone remodeling. J Periodontol 2004;75:572-577.
46. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2000;71:1412-1424.
47. Mericske-Stern R, Piotti M, Sirtes G. 3-D in vivo force measurements on mandibular implants supporting overdentures. A comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:387-396.
48. McCartney JW. Cantilever rests: An alternative to the unsupported distal cantilever of osseointegrated implant-supported prostheses for the edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:817-819.
49. Dudic A, Mericske-Stern R. Retention mechanism and prosthetic complications of implant-supported mandibular overdentures: Long-term results. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002;4:212-219.
50. Hemmings KW, Schmitt A, Zarb GA. Complications and maintenance requirements for fixed prostheses and overdentures in the edentulous mandible: A 5-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:191-196.
51. Fanibunda KB, Allcock GC, Thomason JM. Changes in the facial profile following insertion of complete dentures. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2002;10:143-149.
52. Mohindra NK, Bulman JS. The effect of increasing vertical dimension of occlusion on facial aesthetics. Br Dent J 2002;13:164-168.
53. Zitzmann NU, Sendi P, Marinello CP. An economic evaluation of implant treatment in edentulous patients - Preliminary results. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:20-27.
54. Attard NJ, Zarb GA, Laporte A. Long-term treatment costs associated with implant-supported mandibular prostheses in edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:117-123.
55. Takanashi Y, Penrod JR, Lund JP, Feine JS. A cost comparison of mandibular two-implant overdenture and conventional denture treatment. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:181-186.