Arguing over actions that involve multiple criteria: A critical review

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4724 LNAI, Issue , 2007, Pages 308-319

  Ouerdane, W ^a   Maudet, N ^a   Tsoukias, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION THEORY; FEATURE EXTRACTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SPECIFICATIONS;

ARGUMENTATIVE APPROACH; MULTICRITERIA FEATURES;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 38049112992     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_29     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Modgil, S.: Argumentation for decision support. In: Proc. of the 17th International Conf. on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pp. 822-831 (2006)
2. Amgoud, L., Bonnefon, J.-F., Prade, H.: An Argumentation-based Approach to Multiple Criteria Decision. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 269-280. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
3. Bana a Costa, C.: Les problématiques de l'aide à la décision: vers l'enrichissement de la trilogie choix-tri-rangement. Recherche Operationnelle 30(2), 191-216 (1996)
4. Amgoud, L., Prade, H.: Explaining qualitative decision under uncertainty by argumentation. In: Proc. of the 21st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2006)
5. Atkinson, K.: What Should We Do?: Computational Representation of Persuasive argument in practical reasoning. PhD thesis (2005)
6. Atkinson, K.: Value-based argumentation for democratic support. In: Proc. of the 1st International Conf. on Computational Models of Natural Argument, pp. 47-58. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)
7. Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Value-based argumentation frameworks. In: Proc. of 9th International Workshop on Non Monotonie Reasoning, pp. 443-454 (2002)
8. Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Prakken, H.: Justifying Actions by Accruing Arguments. In: Proc. of the 1st International Conf. on Computational Models of Argument, pp. 247-258. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)
9. Bonnefon, J.-F, Fargier, H.: Comparing sets of positive and negative arguments: Empirical assessment of seven qualitative rules. In: Proc. of 17th European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)
10. Bonet, B., Geffner, H.: Arguing for Decisions: A Qualitative Model of Decision Making. In: Proc. of the 12th Conf. on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 98-105 (1996)
11. Bouyssou, D., Marchant, T., Pirlot, M., Perny, P., Tsoukiàs, A., Vincke, P.: Evaluation and decision models: a critical perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)
12. Beiton, V., Stewart, T.: Muliple Criteria Decision Analysis: an Integrated Approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)
13. Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C.: Graduality in argumentation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 23, 245-297 (2005)
14. Dubois, D., Fargier, H.: On the qualitative comparison of sets of positive and negative affects. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 305-316. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
15. Dung, P.M.: On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), 321-358 (1995)
16. Fox, J., Barber, D., Bardhan, K.D.: Alternatives to bayes? A quantitative comparison with rule-based diagnostic inference. Methods of Information in Medicine 19(4), 210-215 (1980)
17. Fox, J., Parsons, S.: On Using Arguments for Reasoning about Actions and Values. In: Proc. of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Qualitative Preferences in Deliberation and Practical Reasoning, pp. 55-63. AAAI Press, Stanford (1997)
18. Fox, J., Parsons, S.: Arguing about beliefs and actions. In: Applications of Uncertainty Formalisms, pp. 266-302 (1998)
19. Karacapilidis, N.I., Papadias, D.: Hermes: Supporting argumentative discourse in multi-agent decision making. In: AAAI/IAAI, pp. 827-832 (1998)
20. Morge, M., Mancarella, P.: The hedgehog and the fox. an argumentation-based decision support system. In: Proc. of the 4th International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (2007)
21. Modgil, S.: Value based argumentation in hierarchical argumentation. In: Proc. of the 1st International Conf. on Computational Models of Natural Argument (2006)
22. Parsons, S., Jennings, N.R.: Argumentation and multi-agent decision making. In: Proc. of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Interactive and Mixed-Initiative Decision Making, pp. 89-91 (1998)
23. Pollock, J.L.: Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science 11, 481-518 (1987)
24. Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.: Logical systems for defeasible argumentation. In: Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 4, pp. 219-318. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)
25. Tsoukiàs, A.: On the concept of decision aiding process. Annals of Operations Research, appeared previously as DIMACS 2003-38 technical report, Rutgers University (to appear)
26. Walton, D.N.: Argumentation schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1996)