An argumentation-based approach to multiple criteria decision

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3571 LNAI, Issue , 2005, Pages 269-280

  Amgoud, Leila ^a   Bonnefon, Jean Francois ^a   Prade, Henri ^a  

^a IRIT   (France)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Multiple criteria decision; Qualitative scales

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ARGUMENTATION; BIPOLAR SCALE; MULTIPLE-CRITERIA DECISION; QUALITATIVE SCALES;

DECISION THEORY;

EID: 26944447093     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11518655_24     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. L. Amgoud and C. Cayrol. Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. International Journal of Automated Reasoning, Volume 29, N2:125-169, 2002.
2. L. Amgoud and H. Prade. Using arguments for making decisions. In Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 10-17, 2004.
3. B. Bonet and H. Geffner. Arguing for decisions: A qualitative model of decision making. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 98-105, 1996.
4. J. F. Bonnefon, D. Glasspool, R. McCloy, , and P. Yule. Qualitative decision making: Competing methods for the aggregation of arguments. Technical report, 2005.
5. C. I. Chesñevar, A. G. Maguitman, and R. P. Loui. Logical Models of Argument. ACM Computing Surveys, 32(4):337-383, December 2000.
6. D. Dubois and H. Fargier. On the qualitative comparison of sets of positive and negative affects. In Proceedings of ECSQARU'05, 2005.
7. D. Dubois and H. Prade. Weighted minimum and maximum operations, an addendum to 'a review of fuzzy set aggregation connectives'. Information Sciences, 39:205-210, 1986.
8. J. Fox and S. Das. Safe and Sound. Artificial Intelligence in Hazardous Applications. AAAI Press, The MIT Press, 2000.
9. J. Fox and S. Parsons. On using arguments for reasoning about actions and values. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Qualitative Preferences in Deliberation and Practical Reasoning, Stanford, 1997.
10. B. Franklin. Letter to j. b. priestley, 1772, in the complete works, j. bigelow, ed.,. New York: Putnam, page 522, 1887.