Assessing the impact of North Carolina's Predatory Lending Law

Housing Policy Debate

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 573-601

  Quercia, Roberto G ^a   Stegman, Michael A ^b   Davis, Walter R ^b  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Mortgages; State and local governments; Subprime and predatory lending

Indexed keywords

EID: 26044480889     PISSN: 10511482     EISSN: 10511482     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2004.9521514     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ACORN (Association for Community Organizations for Reform Now). 2000. Separate and Unequal: Predatory Lending in America. World Wide Web page (accessed February 19, 2004).
2. Calomiris, Charles W, and Joseph P. Mason. 1999. High Loan-to-Value Mortgage Lending: Problem or Cure? Washington, DC: AEI.
3. Carr, James H., and Lopa Kolluri. 2001. Predatory Lending: An Overview. Washington, DC: Fannie Mae Foundation.
4. Comptroller of the Currency. 2003. Economic Issues in Predatory Lending. OCC Working Paper.
5. Comptroller of the Currency. 2004. OCC Issues Final Rules on National Bank Preemption and Visitorial Powers; Includes Strong Standard to Keep Predatory Lending out of National Banks. World Wide Web page (accessed July 16, 2004).
6. Dreher, Langer, and Tomkies. 2004. Alerts. World Wide Web page (accessed June 3).
7. Elliehausen, Gregory, and Michael E. Staten. 2002. The Regulation of Subprime Mortgage Products: An Analysis of North Carolina's Predatory Lending Law. Working Paper No. 66. Georgetown University, McDonough School of Business, Credit Research Center. World Wide Web page (accessed July 16, 2004).
8. Elliehausen, Gregory, and Michael E. Staten. 2003. An Update on North Carolina's High-Cost Mortgage Law. Unpublished paper. Georgetown University, McDonough School of Business, Credit Research Center.
9. Ernst, Keith, John Farris, and Eric Stein. 2002. North Carolina's Subprime Home Loan Market after Predatory Lending Reform. A Report from the Center for Responsible Lending. Durham, NC. Mimeo.
10. Expanded Guidance for Subprime Lending Programs. 2001. OCC Bulletin No. 2001-6. Washington, DC: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
11. Fannie, Freddie Continue to Eat Large Slice of the Subprime Pie. 2004. Inside B&C Lending 9(2) :2.
12. Gramlich, Edward M. 2000. Remarks at the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Community and Consumer Affairs Department Conference on Predatory Lending. Philadelphia, December 6.
13. Harvey, Keith D., and Peter J. Nigro. 2002. Do Predatory Lending Laws Influence Mortgage Lending? An Analysis of the North Carolina Predatory Lending Law. Paper presented at the Credit Research Center Conference on Subprime Lending, Washington, DC. September 17.
14. Joint Center for Housing Studies. 2002. State of the Nation's Housing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
15. Koren, Imma. 2003. Unprecedented Issuance and Strong Credit Performance Have Been the Dominant Themes in the Home Equity Sector in 2002; 2003 Is Shaping Up to Be More of the Same. Wachovia Securities Structured Products Research, March 4. World Wide Web age (subscription required, accessed March 8).
16. Lenders Will Try to Pin Down Effects of NC Mortgage Law. 2001. Inside B&C Lending 6(5):3.
17. Litan, Robert E. 2003a. North Carolina Predatory Lending Law: Still a Problem despite New Study. Regulatory Analysis 03-9. Washington, DC: AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.
18. Litan, Robert E. 2003b. Unintended Consequences: The Risks of Premature State Regulation of Predatory Lending. World Wide Web page (accessed August 18).
19. Morgan Stanley. 2002. Channel Check: Surprisingly Strong Subprime Growth. Diversified Financials. August 1. World Wide Web page (accessed July 16, 2004).
20. Mortgage Bankers Association. 2004. Latest State Legislative and Regulatory News. World Wide Web page (accessed February 9).
21. Phillips-Patrick, Fred, Eric Hirschborn, Jonathan Jones, and John LaRocca, for the Office of Thrift Supervision. 2000. What about Subprime Mortgages? Mortgage Market Trends 4(1):1-21.
22. Quercia, Roberto G. 1997. House Value Appreciation among Older Homeowners: Implications for Reverse Mortgage Programs. Journal of Housing Research 8(2):201-23.
23. Quercia, Roberto G., Michael A. Stegman, and Walter R. Davis. 2003. The Impact of North Carolina's Anti-Predatory Lending Law: A Descriptive Assessment. Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Community Capitalism.
24. Reinvestment Fund. 2004. Predatory Lending: An Approach to Identify and Understand Predatory Lending. World Wide Web page (accessed June 4).
25. Richardson, Christopher A. 2003. Predatory Lending and Housing Disinvestment. Unpublished paper. World Wide Web page (accessed June 23).
26. Roche, Ellen P. 2000. Statement of Ellen P. Roche [Director of Corporate Relations, Freddie Mac]. Profitwise 10(3):8-9.
27. Standard & Poor's Addresses North Carolina Anti-Predatory Lending Law. 2004. Business Wire. World Wide Web page (accessed July 16, 2004).
28. State of Washington. 2003. World Wide Web page (accessed June 20, 2003).
29. State of Washington, Department of Financial Institutions. 2002. Expanded Report of Examinations for Household Finance Corporation III as of April 30, 2000. World Wide Web page (accessed July 16, 2004).
30. The 2003 Mortgage Market Statistical Annual. 2003. Washington, DC: Inside Mortgage Finance Publications, Inc.
31. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2000. Unequal Burden: Income and Racial Disparities in Subprime Lending in America. Washington, DC.
32. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. 2001. Subprime and Manufactured Home Lender List, 2001. World Wide Web page (last modified November 7, 2003).
33. Walters, Neal, and Sharon Hermanson. 2002. Older Subprime Refinance Mortgage Borrowers. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute. World Wide Web page (accessed June 20, 2003).