Modularization constructs in method engineering: Towards common ground?

IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

Volumn 244, Issue , 2007, Pages 359-368

  Ågerfalk, Pär J ^a   Brinkkemper, Sjaak ^b   Gonzalez Perez, Cesar ^c   Henderson Sellers, Brian ^d   Karlsson, Fredrik ^e   Kelly, Steven ^f   Ralyté, Jolita ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d TECNALIA RESEARCH AND INNOVATION   (Spain)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^f ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^g MetaCase   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMON GROUND; METHOD COMPONENTS; METHOD ENGINEERING; METHOD FRAGMENTS; MODULARIZATIONS; NUMBER OF PEOPLES; PROCESS COMPONENT; RESEARCH COMMUNITIES;

SEMANTICS;

MODULAR CONSTRUCTION;

EID: 38049072208     PISSN: 15715736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73947-2_27     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Harmsen, F., Brinkkemper, S., and Oei, H. (1994). Situational Method Engineering for Information System Project Approaches. In: A.A. Verrijn Stuart and T.W. Olle (Eds.), Methods and Associated Tools for the Information Systems Life Cycle. Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.1 Working Conference, Maastricht, Netherlands, September 1994, IFIP Transactions A-55, North-Holland, 1994, ISBN 0-444-82074-4, pp. 169-194. Also in: Memoranda Informatica 94-03, ISSN 0924-3755, 34 pages, January 1994.
2. Brinkkemper, S. (1996). Method engineering: Engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Information and Software Technology, 38(4), 275-280.
3. Harmsen, A.F. (1997). Situational method engineering. Doctoral dissertation, Moret Ernst & Young Management Consultants, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
4. Brinkkemper S., Saeki, M., and Harmsen, F. (1999). Meta-Modelling Based Assembly Techniques for Situational Method Engineering, Information Systems, 24(3), pp. 209-228.
5. Brinkkemper S., Saeki M., and Harmsen, F. (2001). A Method Engineering Language for the Description of Systems Development Methods (Extended Abstract). In: K.R. Dittrich, A Geppert, and M.C. Norrie (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference CAiSE'01, pp. 173-179, Interlaken, Switzerland, 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Verlag. ISBN 3-540-42215-3.
6. Xu, L. and Brinkkemper, S. (2007). Concepts for Product Software. To appear in European Journal of Information Systems.
7. Weerd, I. van de, Brinkkemper, S., Souer, J., and Versendaal, J. (2006). A Situational Implementation Method for Web-based Content Management System-applications: Method Engineering and Validation in Practice. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 11 (5), 521-538.
8. Weerd, I. van de, Brinkkemper, S., Versendaal J. (2007). Concepts for Incremental Method Evolution: Empirical Exploration and Validation in Requirements Management. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, LNCS 4495, 469-484.
9. Rolland, C. and Prakash, N. (1996). A proposal for context-specific method engineering. In S. Brinkkemper, K. Lyytinen & R. Welke (Eds.), Method Engineering: Principles of method construction and tool support Vol. 191-208): Chapman & Hall.
10. Rolland, C., Plihon, V. and Ralyté, J. (1998). Specifying the Reuse Context of Scenario Method Chunks. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Advanced Information System Engineering (CAISE'98), Pisa, Italy, June 1998. B. Pernici, C. Thanos (Eds), LNCS 1413, Springer-Verlag, pp. 191-218.
11. Ralyté, J. and Rolland, C. (2001). An Approach for Method Reengineering. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER2001), LNCS 2224, Springer-Verlag, pp.471-484.
12. Ralyté, J., Deneckère, R., and Rolland, C. (2003). Towards a Generic Model for Situational Method Engineering, In Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2003), Klagenfurt, Austria, June 16-18, 2003, (Eds, Eder J, et al.) Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, pp. 95-110.
13. Mirbel, I. and Ralyté, J. (2006). Situational method engineering: combining assembly-based and roadmap-driven approaches, Requirements Engineering, 11 (1), pp. 58-78.
14. Jarke, M., Rolland, C., Sutcliffe, A., and Domges, R. (1999). The NATURE requirements Engineering. Shaker Verlag, Aachen.
15. Rolland, C., Prakash, N., and Benjamen, A. (1999). A multi-model view of process modelling. Requirements Engineering, 4(4), 169-187.
16. Henderson-Sellers, B., Gonzalez-Perez, C., and Ralyté, J. (2007). Situational method engineering: Chunks or fragments? CAiSE Forum, Trondheim, 11-15 June 2007, 89-92
17. Röstlinger, A., and Goldkuhl, G. (1996). Generisk flexibilitet: På väg mot en komponentbaserad metodsyn, In Swedish: "Generic flexibility: Towards a component-based view of methods, Technical Report LiTH-IDA-R-96-15, Dept. of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University. Originally presented at VITS Höstseminarium 1994.
18. Goldkuhl, G., Lind, M., and Seigerroth, U. (1998). Method integration: The need for a learning perspective, IEE Proceedings Software, 145, 113-118.
19. Ågerfalk, P.J. (2003). Information Systems Actability: Understanding Information Technology as a Tool for Business Action and Communication. Doctoral dissertation. Dept. of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, 2003.
20. Wistrand, K. and Karlsson, F. (2004). Method Components: Rationale Revealed. In Persson, A. and Stirna, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2004), Riga, Latvia, June 7-11, 2004. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.
21. Karlsson, F. (2005) Method Configuration: Method and Computerized Tool Support. Doctoral dissertation. Dept. of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University.
22. Karlsson, F. and Wistrand, K. (2006). Combining method engineering with activity theory: Theoretical grounding of the method component concept. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 82-90.
23. Ågerfalk, P.J. and Wistrand, K. (2003). Systems Development Method Rationale: A Conceptual Framework for Analysis. In Camp, O., Filipe, J., Hammoudi, S. & Piattini, M. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2003) Angers, France.
24. Rossi, M., Ramesh, B., Lyytinen, K., and Tolvanen, J.-P. (2004). Managing evolutionary method engineering by method rationale. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(9), 356-391.
25. Ågerfalk, P.J. and Fitzgerald, B. (2006). Exploring the Concept of Method Rationale: A Conceptual Tool for Method Tailoring. In Siau, K. (Ed.) Advanced Topics in Database Research Vol 5. Hershey, PA, Idea Group.
26. Fitzgerald, B., Russo, N. L., and Stolterman, E. (2002). Information systems development - methods in action. London: McGraw-Hill.
27. Henderson-Sellers, B. and Graham, I.M. (1996). OPEN: Toward method convergence? IEEE Computer, 29(4), 86-89
28. Firesmith, D.G. and Henderson-Sellers, B. (2002). The OPEN Process Framework. An Introduction, Addison-Wesley, 330pp
29. ISO/IEC (2007). Software Engineering. Metamodel for Development Methodologies. ISO/IEC 24744: International Standards Organization/ International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva.