A situational implementation method for web-based content management system-applications: method engineering and validation in practice

Software Process Improvement and Practice

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 521-538

  Van De Weerd, Inge ^a   Brinkkemper, Sjaak ^a   Souer, Jurriaan ^b   Versendaal, Johan ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b GX   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Content management system; Implementation method; Meta modeling; Situational method engineering; Web application; Web based CMS applications

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; ENGINEERING RESEARCH; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; METADATA; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; WORLD WIDE WEB;

CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM; IMPLEMENTATION METHOD; META MODELING; SITUATIONAL METHOD ENGINEERING; WEB BASED CMS APPLICATIONS;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 33750350192     PISSN: 10774866     EISSN: 10991670     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/spip.294     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aydin MN, Harmsen F. 2002. Making a Method Work for a Project Situation in the Context of CMM. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2559, Springer Berlin: Heidelberg, 158-171, DOI: 10.1109/ICSE.2003.1201204.
2. Baresi L, Garzotto F, Paolini P. 2001. Extending UML for modeling web applications. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE Computer Society: Los Alamitos, CA, USA, DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2001.926350.
3. Baumeister H, Koch N, Mandel L. 1999. Towards a UML extension for hypermedia design. Proceedings "UML" '99, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1723, Springer Berlin: Heidelberg, 614-629.
4. van Berkum M, Brinkkemper S, Meyer A. 2004. A combined runtime environment and web-based development environment for web application engineering. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2004), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3084, Springer Berlin: Heidelberg, 307-321, DOI: 10.1007/b98058.
5. Brinkkemper S. 1996. Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Information and Software Technology 38(4): 275-280.
6. Brinkkemper S. 1998. Global process management. Dynamic Enterprise Innovation: Establishing Continuous Improvement in Business, Baan Business Innovation: Putten, The Netherlands, 4-8-4-15.
7. Burzagli L, Billi M, Gabbanini F, Graziani P, Palchetti E. 2004. The use of current content management systems for accessibility. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP 2004), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 311, Springer Berlin: Heidelberg, 331-338.
8. Ceri S, Fraternali P, Bongio A. 2000. Web Modeling Language (WebML): A modeling language for designing web sites. Computer Networks 33: 137-157, DOI: 10.1016/51389-1286(00)00040-2.
9. Chen PP. 1976. The entity-relationship model-Towards a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 1(1): 9-36.
10. De Troyer OMF, Leune CJ. 1998. WSDM: A user-centered design method for web sites. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30(1): 85-94, DOI: 10.1016/50169-7552(98)00042-7.
11. Dietzsch A. 2002. Adapting the UML to business modelling's needs-experiences in situational method engineering. «UML » 2002-Proceedings of the Unified Modeling Language; Fifth International Conference. Springer: Dresden, Germany, 73-83.
12. Escalona MJ, Koch N. 2004. Requirements engineering for web applications: A comparative study. Journal on Web Engineering, Vol. 2(3). Rinton Press: Princeton, New Jersey, 193-212.
13. Gnaho C. 2001. Web-Based Information Systems Development-A User Centered Engineering Approach. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2016, Springer Berlin: Heidelberg, 105-118.
14. IEEE. 1998. Std. 830-1998 Guide to Software Requirements Specifications (ANSI). Resource and Technique Standards. Vol. 4. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. IEEE Software Engineering Standards Collection: New York, USA.
15. Jacobson I, Booch G, Rumbaugh J. 1999. The Unified Software Development Process. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc: Redwood City, CA.
16. Karlsson F. 2002. Bridging the gap between method for method configuration and situational method engineering. Promote IT. Skövde: Sweden.
17. Karlsson F, Ågerfalk PJ. 2004. Method configuration: Adapting to situational characteristics while creating reusable assets. Information and Software Technology 46(9): 619-633.
18. Koch N. 2001. Software engineering for adaptive Hypermedia applications. Phd Thesis, Uni-Druck Publishing Company, Austria, Munich.
19. Kumar K, Welke RJ. 1992. Methodology engineering: A proposal for situation specific methodology construction. Challenges and Strategies for Research in Systems Development. John Wiley and Sons: Washington, DC, 257-269.
20. Larman C, Kruchten P, Bittner K. 2001. How to Fail with the Rational Unified Process: Seven Steps to Pain and Suffering. Valtech Technologies & Rational Software.
21. Lowe D, Henderson-Sellers B. 2001. Characteristics of Web Development Processes.In Proceedings of SSGRR-2001: International Conference on Advances in Infrastructure for Electronic Business, Science and Education on the Internet, Scuola Superiore Guglielmo Reiss Romoli, Italy, 21.
22. March S, Smith G. 1995. Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15: 251-266, DOI: 10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2.
23. OMG. 2003. UML 2.0 Superstructure final adopted specification, Document reference ptc/04-10-02 August 2003. Available from the Object Management Group website: www.omg.org.
24. Ralyté J, Deneckère R, Rolland C. 2003. Towards a Generic Model for Situational Method Engineering. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2681, Springer Berlin: Heidelberg, 95.
25. Robertson R. 2003. So, what is a content management system? KM Column. Step Two Designs Pty Ltd. http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc-what/pdf/ KMC_What.pdf, accessed 12/01/06.
26. Rossi M, Subramah M, Lyytinen K, Kaipala J, Tolvanen JP. 2000. Method rationale in method engineering. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science. IEEE Computer Society Press: New York, USA, DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2000.926680.
27. Sauer S, Engels G. 1999. Extending UML for modeling of multimedia applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, 80, DOI: 10.1109/VL.1999.795878.
28. Saeki M. 2003. Embedding metrics into information systems development methods: an application of method engineering technique. In CAiSE 2003: The 15th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, 374-389.
29. van Slooten K, Brinkkemper S. 1993. A method engineering approach to information systems development. In Information Systems Development Process, 167-186.
30. van Slooten K, Hodes B. 1996. Characterizing IS development projects. Method Engineering: Principles of method construction and tool support. Proceedings of the IFIP TC8, WG8.7/8.2 Working Conference on Method Engineering, Atlanta, GA.
31. Souer J, van der Weerd I, Versendaal J, Brinkkemper S. 2005. Situational Requirements Engineering for the Development of Content Management System - based Web Applications. Accepted for a publication in the International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology (IJWET).
32. Vaishnavi V, Kuechler W. 2004. Design Research in Information Systems, http://www.isworld.org/Researchdesign/drisISworld.htm, accessed 12/01/06.
33. Vidgen R, Goodwin S, Barnes S. 2001. Web Content Management. In Proceedings of the 14th International Electronic Commerce Conference, Bled, Slovenia, 465-480.
34. van de Weerd I. 2005. WEM: A design method for CMS-based web implementations. Technical report UUCS-2005-043. University of Utrecht, Department of Information and Computing Sciences: Utrecht, The Netherlands.