Systems development method rationale: A conceptual framework for analysis

ICEIS 2003 - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems

Volumn 3, Issue , 2003, Pages 185-190

  Ågerfalk, Pär J ^a   Wistrand, Kai ^a  

^a ÖREBRO UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Method Configuration; Method Engineering; Method fragments; Method goals; Method integration; Method rationale; Method values; Standard methods

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

METHOD CONFIGURATION; METHOD ENGINEERING; METHOD FRAGMENTS; METHOD GOALS; METHOD INTEGRATION; METHOD RATIONALE; METHOD VALUES;

STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 84910040179     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Ågerfalk, P. J., & Åhlgren, K. (1999). Modelling the rationale of methods. In M. Khosrowpour (Ed.), Managing Information Technology Resources in Organizations in the Next Millennium (pp. 184-190). Hershey, PA: IDEA Group Publishing.
2. Ågerfalk, P. J., Wistrand, K., Karlsson, F., Börjesson, G., Elmberg, M., & Möller, K. (2003). Flexible Processes and Method Configuration: Outline of a Joint Industry-Academia Research Project, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2003).
3. Ayer, A. J. (2001). Language, truth and logic (New ed.). London: Penguin.
4. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor books.
5. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., & Jacobson, I. (1999). The Unified Modeling Language user guide. Harlow, UK: Addison-Wesley.
6. Brinkkemper, S., Saeki, M., & Harmsen, F. (1999). Meta-modelling based assembly techniques for situational method engineering. Information Systems, 24(3), 209-228.
7. Cronholm, S., & Ågerfalk, P. J. (1999). On the Concept of Method in Information Systems Development. In T. Käkölä (Ed.), Proceedings of the 22nd Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (IRIS 22) (Vol. 1, pp. 229-236).
8. Goldkuhl, G., Lind, M., & Seigerroth, U. (1998). Method integration: The need for a learning perspective. IEE Proceedings - Software, 145(4), 113-118.
9. Karlsson, F., Ågerfalk, P. J., & Hjalmarsson, A. (2001). Process Configuration with Development Tracks and Generic Project Types, Proceedings of the 6th CAiSE/IFIP8.1 International Workshop on Evaluation of Modelling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD'01).
10. Kruchten, P. (1999). The rational unified process: an introduction. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11. Rossi, M., Tolvanen, J.-P., Ramesh, B., Lyytinen, K., & Kaipala, J. (2000). Method Rationale in Method Engineering, Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-33): IEEE Computer Society Press.
12. Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., & Lorensen, W. (1991). Object-oriented modeling and design. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
13. Stolterman, E. (1992). How system designers think about design and methods: Some Reflections Based on an Interview Study. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 4, 137-150.