Constraint-induced movement therapy in neurological rehabilitation: which modality to choose? Our experience in rehabilitation in Geneva;La thérapie par contrainte en rééducation neurologique : quelles modalités choisir ? Notre expérience dans le service de neurorééducation à Genève

Annales de Readaptation et de Medecine Physique

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 31-37

  Leemann, B ^a   Croix, J ^a   Kupper, D ^a   Schnider, A ^a  

^a GENEVA UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Constraint induced movement therapy; Hemiplegia; Learned nonuse

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CONSTRAINT INDUCED THERAPY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; DISEASE DURATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT THERAPY; STROKE; STROKE PATIENT; TREATMENT DURATION;

AGED, 80 AND OVER; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RESTRAINT, PHYSICAL; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 38049003633     PISSN: 01686054     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2007.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Beis J.M. La rééducation améliore-t-elle l'activité gestuelle et la préhension ?. Ann. Readapt. Med. Phys. 40 (1997) 185-191
2. Bonifer N.M., Anderson K.M., and Arciniegas D.B. Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke: efficacy for patients with minimal upper extremity motor ability. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 86 (2005) 1867-1873
3. Dettmers C., Teske U., Hamzei F., Uswatte G., Taub E., and Weiller C. Distributed form of constraint-induced movement therapy improves functional outcome and quality of life after stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 86 (2005) 204-209
4. Dromerick A.W., Edwards D.F., and Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke?. Stroke 31 (2000) 2984-2988
5. Duque J., Mazzocchio R., Dambrosia J., Murase N., Olivier E., and Cohen L.G. Kinematically specific interhemispheric inhibition operating in the process of generation of a voluntary movement. Cereb. Cortex 15 (2005) 588-593
6. Floel A., Nagorsen U., Werhahn K.J., Ravindran S., Birbaumer N., Knecht S., et al. Influence of somatosensory input on motor function in patients with chronic stroke. Ann. Neurol. 56 (2004) 206-212
7. Fugl-Meyer A.R., Jaasko L., Leyman I., Olsson S., and Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: a method for an evaluation of physical performance. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. 7 (1975) 13-31
8. Gladstone D.J., Danells C.J., and Black S.E. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke. A critical review of its measurement proprieties. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 1683 (2002) 232-240
9. Gregson J.M., Leathley M., Moore A.P., Sharma A.K., Smith T.L., and Watkins C.L. Reliability of the tone assessment scale and the modified Ashworth scale as clinical tools for assessing poststroke spasticity. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 80 9 (1999) 1013-1016
10. Grotta J.C., Noser E.A., Ro T., Boake C., Levin H., Aronowski J., et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke 35 suppl I (2004) 2699-2701
11. Humm J., Kozlowski D.A., James D.C., Gotts J.E., and Schallert T. Use-dependent exacerbation of brain damage occurs during an early post-lesion vulnerable period. Brain Res. 783 (1998) 286-292
12. Levine P., and Page S.J. Modified constraint-induced therapy. A promising restorative outpatient therapy. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 11 4 (2004) 1-10
13. Levy C.E., Nichols D.S., Schmalbrock P.M., Keller P., and Chakeres D.W. Functional MRI evidence of cortical reorganisation in upper-limb stroke hemiplegia treated with constraint-induced movement therapy. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 80 1 (2001) 4-12
14. Liepert J., Uhde I., Gräf S., Leidner O., and Weiller C. Motor cortex plasticity during forced-use therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. J. Neurol. 248 (2000) 315-321
15. Lillie R., and Mateer C.A. Constraint-based therapies as proposed model for cognitive rehabilitation. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 21 2 (2006) 119-130
16. Lincoln N.B., Parry R.H., and Vass C.D. Randomized controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. Stroke 30 (1999) 573-579
17. Nadeau S.E., Behrman A.L., Davis S.E., Reid K., Wu S.S., Stidham B.S., et al. Donepezil as an adjuvant to constraint-induced therapy for upper-limb dysfunction after stroke: an exploratory randomized clinical trial. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 41 4 (2004) 525-534
18. Nudo R.J., Wise B.M., SiFuentes F., and Milliken G.W. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 272 (1996) 1791-1794
19. Page S.J., Sisto S., Levine P., and McGrath R.E. Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85 1 (2004) 14-18
20. Page S.J., Levine P., and Leonard A.C. Modified constraint-induced therapy in acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 19 (2005) 27-32
21. Ploughmann M., and Corbett D. Can forced-use therapy be clinically cpplied after stroke? An exploratory randomized controlled trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85 (2004) 1417-1423
22. Porter K., and Lord S. Constraint-induced movement therapy for people following stroke in an outpatient setting. NZ J. Physiother. 32 3 (2004) 111-119
23. Siegert R.J., and Lord S. Constraint-induced movement therapy: time for a little restraint?. Clin. Rehabil. 18 (2004) 110-114
24. Sterr A., Elbert T., Berthold I., Kölbel S., Rockstroh B., and Taub E. Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 83 (2002) 1374-1377
25. Sunderland A., and Tuke A. Neuroplasticity, learning and recovery after stroke: a critical evaluation of constraint-induced therapy. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 15 2 (2005) 81-96
26. Taub E., Miller N.E., Novack T.A., Cook E.W., Fleming W.C., Nepomuceno C.S., et al. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 74 (1993) 347-354
27. Taub E., Uswatte G., and Pidikiti R. Constraint-induced movement therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation. A clinical review. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 36 3 (1999) 237-251
28. Taub E., Uswatte G., King D.K., Morris D., Crago J.E., and Chatterjee A. A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke 37l (2006) 1-8
29. van der Lee J.H., Wagenaar R.C., Lankhorst G.J., Vogelaar T.W., Devillé W.L., and Bouter L.M. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients. Results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke 30 (1999) 2369-2375
30. van der Lee J.H., Beckermann H., Knol D.L., de Vet H.C., and Bouter L.M. Clinometric properties of motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke 35 6 (2004) 1410-1414
31. Wolf S.L., Lecraw D.E., Barton L.A., and Jann B.B. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned non use among chronic stroke and head-Injured patients. Exp. Neurol. 104 (1989) 125-132
32. Wolf S.L., Blanton S., Baer H., Breshears J., and Butler A.J. Repetitive task practice: a critical review of constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke. Neurologist 8 (2002) 325-338
33. Wolf S.L., McJunkin J.P., Swanson M.L., and Weiss P.S. Pilot normative database for the Wolf Motor Function Test. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 87 (2006) 443-445
34. Wolf S.L., Winstein C.J., Miller J.P., Taub E., Uswatte G., Morris D., et al. Effect of the constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke, the Excite randomized clinical trial. JAMA 296 17 (2006) 2095-2104