Does rehabilitation improve manual activity and prehension?;La reeducation amelior-t-elle l'activite gestuelle et la prehension?

Annales de Readaptation et de Medecine Physique

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 185-191

  Beis, J M ^a  

^a Ctr Readapt Pour Grands Handicapes   (France)

Author keywords

Manual activity; Prehension; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; CONVALESCENCE; ELECTROSTIMULATION THERAPY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT EDUCATION; REHABILITATION; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION;

EID: 0030855152     PISSN: 01686054     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-6054(97)87958-5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. 1 André JM, Chellig L, Brugerolle B. Rééducation de la préhension chez l'hémiplégique: place et limites des principales méthodes. Intérêt d'une approche cognitive. In: J Pelissier, ed. Hémiplégie vasculaire de l'adulte et médecine de rééducation. Paris: Masson, 1988;11:224-32
2. 2 Andrews K, Stewart J. Stroke recovery: he can but does he? Rheumatol Rehabil 1979;18:43-8
3. 3 Ashburn A. A physical assessment for stroke patients. Physiotherapy 1982;68:109-13
4. 4 Balliet R, Levy B, Blood K. Upper extremity sensory feedback therapy in chronic cerebrovascular accident patients with impaired expressive aphasia and auditory comprehension. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;67:304-10
5. 5 Basmajian JV. Biofeedback in rehabilitation medecine. -De Lisa-Rehabilitation Medecine: principe and practice. Philadelphia: JP Lippincot (2nd ed), 1993:425-39
6. 6 Bobath B. Adult hemiplegia: evaluation and treatment. London: W Heinemann Medical Book (3th ed), 1990:1-69
7. 7 Brudny J, Korein J, Grynbaum BB. Helping hemiparetic to help themselves: sensory feedback therapy. JAMA 1979; 241:814-8
8. 8 Brugerolle B, Albert A, Chomiki R. La stimulation électrique fonctionnelle pour l'utilisation de la main chez l'hémiplégique. Ann Readapt Med Phys 1988;1:63-8
9. 9 Carey LM, Mattas T, Oke LE. Sensory loss in stroke patients: effective training of tactile and proprioceptive discrimination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74/6:602-11
10. 10 Dannenbaum RM, Dykes RW. Sensory loss in the hand after sensory stroke: therapeutic rationale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69/10:833-9
11. 11 Dobkin HB. Neurologic Rehabilitation. Philadelphia: FA Davis (Company Contempory Neurology series) 1996; 473:40 p
12. 12 Faghri PD, Rodgers MM, Glaser RM. The effects of functional electrical stimulation on shoulder subluxation, arm function recovery, and shoulder pain in hemiplegic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75/1:73-9
13. 13 Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko I, Leyman I. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient: a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975;7:13-31
14. 14 Gowland C. Management of hemiplec upper limbs. In: Branstater ME, Basmajian JV, eds. Stroke Rehabilitation. Baltimore Md: Wiliams and Wilkins, 1987:217-45
15. 15 Gowland C, Debruin H, Basmajian JV. Agonist and antagonist activity during voluntary upper-limb movement in patients with stroke. Phys Ther 1992;72/9:624-33
16. 16 Inglis J, Donald MW, Monga TN. Electromyographic biofeedback and physical therapy of the hemiplegic upper limb. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984;65/12:755-9
17. 17 Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Triechmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1969;50/6:311-9
18. 18 Kalra L, Dale P, Crome P. Improving stroke rehabilitation. A controlled study. Stroke 1993;24/10:1462-7
19. 19 Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA, Kase CS. Time course of functional recovery after stroke: the Framingham study. J Neurol Rehabil 1989;3:65-70
20. 20 Klippel M, Monier-Vinard R. Les hémiplégies. Nouveau Traité de Médecine. Système nerveux. Sémiologie. Paris: Masson, 1928:18
21. 21 Knott M, Voss D. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation. Bruxelles: Prodim (2 ed), 1968:235 p
22. 22 Kraft GH, Fitts SS, Hammond MC. Techniques to improve fonction of the arm and hand in chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73/3:220-7
23. 23 Lion J. L'approche sensorimotrice de la rééducation de l'hémiplégie. Concilia Medica 1987;1/6:159-66
24. 24 Macleod J. The nervous system in clinical examination. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone (6th ed), 1983
25. 25 Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strengh evaluation. J Hand Surg 1984;97/2:222-6
26. 26 Mahoney F, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Med J 1965;14:61-5
27. 27 Moreland J, Thomson MA. Efficacy of Electromyographic Biofeedback compared with conventional physical therapy for upper-extremity function in patients following stroke: a research overview and meta-analysis. Phys Ther 1994;74/6:534-43
28. 28 Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raashou HO. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75/4:394-8
29. 29 Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raashou HO. Compensation in recovery of upper-extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75/8:852-7
30. 30 Perfetti C. Condotte terapeutiche per la reeducatione motoria del l'emiplegico. Milano: Ghedini, 1986
31. 31 Reitan RM. Manual for administration of neuropsychological test batteries for adults and childrens. Tucson: Neurological Laboratories, 1979
32. 32 Sawner KA, Lavigne JU. Brunnstrom's movement therapy in hemiplegia, a neurophysiological approach. Philadelphia: Lippincott, (2nd ed) 1992:1-67
33. 33 Scandinavian Stroke Study Group: Mulitcenter trial of hemodilution in ischemic stroke. Stroke 1987;18:691-9
34. 34 Schleenbacker R, Mainous AG. Electromyographic-biofeedback for neuromuscular reeducation in the hemiplegic stroke patient: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74/12:1301-4
35. 35 Sivenius J, Pyorala K, Heinonen O. The signifiance of intensity of rehabilitation of stroke. A controlled trial. Stroke 1985;16/6:928-32
36. 36 Turton A, Fraser CM. The test battery to measure the recovery of volontary movement control following stroke. Int Rehabil Med 1986;8/2:74-8
37. 37 Turton A, Fraser CM. The use of home therapy programmes for improving recovery of the upper limb following stroke. Br Occup Ther 1990;53/11:457-62
38. 38 Voss DE, Ionta MK, Myers BJ. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation: patterns and techniques. Philadelphia: Harper and Row (3rd ed), 1985
39. 39 Wolf SL. Invited Commentary to Moreland J, Thomson MA. Efficacy of Electromyographic biofeedback with conventional physical therapy for upper-extremity function in patients following stroke. Phys Ther 1994;74:544-5
40. 40 Yekutiel M, Guttman E. A controlled trial of the retraining of the sensory function of the hand in stroke patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993;56:241-4