Vancouver, Toronto, Montreal, Austin: Enhanced oddball memory through differentiation, not isolation

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 474-479

  Sakamoto, Yasuaki ^a   Love, Bradley C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37849188800     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193872     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. BATTING, W. F. (1979). The flexibility of human memory. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing and human memory (pp. 23-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. BUSEY, T. A., & TUNNICLIFF, J. L. (1999). Accounts of blending, distinctiveness, and typicality in the false recognition of faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1210-1235.
3. DAVIDENKO, N., & RAMSCAR, M. (2004). Reexamining the "distinctiveness effect": Poorer recognition of distinctive face silhouettes. In K. D. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 1550). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. FABIANI, M., & DONCHIN, E. (1995). Encoding processes and memory organization: A model of the von Restorff effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 224-240.
5. FANTZ, R. L. (1964). Visual experience in infants: Decreased attention to familiar patterns relative to novel ones. Science, 146, 668-670.
6. FRIEDMAN, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316-355.
7. GOODMAN, G. S. (1980). Picture memory: How the action schema affects retention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 473-495.
8. HUNT, R. R., & LAMB, C. A. (2001). What causes the isolation effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1359-1366.
9. JENKINS, W. O., & POSTMAN, L. (1948). Isolation and "spread of effect" in serial learning. American Journal of Psychology, 61, 214-221.
10. KELLEY, M. R., & NAIRNE, J. S. (2001). Von Restorff revisited: Isolation, generation, and memory for order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 54-66.
11. KISHIYAMA, M. M., YONELINAS, A. P., & LAZZARA, M. M. (2004). The von Restorff effect in amnesia: The contribution of the hippocampal system to novelty-related memory enhancements. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 15-23.
12. LOVE, B. C. (2002, September). Two systems or just one? Paper presented at the Cognitive Neuroscience of Category Learning Consortium, New York.
13. LOVE, B. C., MEDIN, D. L., & GURECKIS, T. M. (2004). SUSTAIN: A network model of human category learning. Psychological Review, 111, 309-332.
14. MCCALL, R. B., & CARRIGER, M. S. (1993). A meta-analysis of infant habituation and recognition memory performance as predictors of later IQ. Child Development, 64, 57-59.
15. METCALFE, J. (1993). Novelty monitoring, metacognition, and control in a composite holographic associative recall model: Implications for Korsakoff amnesia. Psychological Review, 100, 3-22.
16. NAIRNE, J. S. (2006). Modeling distinctiveness: Implications for general memory theory. In R. R. Hunt & J. B. Worthen (Eds.), Distinctiveness and memory (pp. 27-46). New York: Oxford University Press.
17. NOSOFSKY, R. M., PALMERI, T. J., & MCKINLEY, S. C. (1994). Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review, 101, 53-79.
18. NOSOFSKY, R. M., & ZAKI, S. F. (2003). A hybrid-similarity exemplar model for predicting distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 1194-1209.
19. ONO, H. (1967). Difference threshold for stimulus length under simultaneous and nonsimultaneous viewing conditions. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 201-207.
20. PALMERI, T. J., & NOSOFSKY, R. M. (1995). Recognition memory for exceptions to the category rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 548-568.
21. PINKER, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253, 530-535.
22. RANGANATH, C., & RAINER, G. (2003). Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 193-202.
23. RESCORLA, R. A., & WAGNER, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
24. SAKAMOTO, Y., & LOVE, B. C. (2004). Schematic influences on category learning and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 534-553.
25. SAKAMOTO, Y., MATSUKA, T., & LOVE, B. C. (2004). Dimension-wide vs. exemplar-specific attention in category learning and recognition. In M. Lovett, C. Schunn, C. Lebiere, & P. Munro (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of Cognitive Modeling (pp. 261-266). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. SCHMIDT, S. R. (1985). Encoding and retrieval processes in the memory for conceptually distinctive events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 565-578.
27. SCHMIDT, S. R. (1991). Can we have a distinctive theory of memory? Memory & Cognition, 19, 523-542.
28. STANGOR, C., & MCMILLAN, D. (1992). Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: A review of the social and social developmental literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 42-61.
29. TAYLOR, S. E., FISKE, S. T., ETCOFF, N. L., & RUDERMAN, A. J. (1978). Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 36, 778-793.
30. VALENTINE, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161-204.
31. VON RESTORFF,H. (1933). Analyse von Vorgängen in Spurenfeld: I. Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld [Analysis of processes in the memory trace: I. On the effect of group formations on the memory trace]. Psychologische Forschung, 18, 299-342.
32. ZAKI, S. R., & NOSOFSKY, R. M. (2001). Exemplar accounts of blending and distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1022-1041.