Emergence and growth of Mjärdevi Science Park in Linköping, Sweden

European Planning Studies

Volumn 14, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1331-1361

  Hommen, Leif ^a   Doloreux, David ^b   Larsson, Emma ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ACTIVITY; INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT; INNOVATION; REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EURASIA; EUROPE; LINKOPING; NORTHERN EUROPE; OSTERGOTLAND; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

EID: 37849188755     PISSN: 09654313     EISSN: 14695944     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09654310600852555     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Accelerator i Linköping, AB. (2005). Available at http://www.acceleratorn.com/ (accessed 20 April, 2005)
2. Ahlbom, H. (2002) Kista sämst i klassen: Tre ganger flera företag startas i Ideon och Mjärdevi Ny Teknik, 39(2), pp. 10.
3. Amirahmadi, H. and Staff, G. (1993) Science parks: A critical assessment Journal of Planning Literature, 8, pp. 107-123.
4. Asheim, B. (2001) Learning regions as development coalitions: Partnership as governance in European workfare states? Concepts and Transformation, 6(1), pp. 73-101.
5. Asheim, B. (2002) Temporary organizations and embeddedness of learning and knowledge creation Geografiska Annaler, 84B(2), pp. 111-124.
6. Asheim, B.(2004) From clusters to projects: Spatial embeddedness and disembeddedness of learning and knowledge creation in the globalizing economy. In Knowledge Spillovers and Knowledge Management. Cheltenham/ Northhampton MA: Edward Elgar.
7. Asheim, B. and Isaksen, A. (2002) Regional innovation systems: The integration of local 'sticky' knowledge and global 'ubiquitous' knowledge Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, pp. 77-86.
8. Autio, E. and Klofsten, M. (1998) A comparative study of two European business incubators Journal of Small Business Management, 36(1), pp. 30-43.
9. Bakouros, Y. and Mardas, D. and Varsakelis, N. (2003) Science Parks, a high tech fantasy?: An analyzing of the science parks of Greece Technovation, 22, pp. 123-128.
10. Bengtsson, L.(2003) Forskningparkens betydelse för företagens och regionens utveckling och tillväxt - en studie av Ideon 1983-2003. Eknomihögskolan: Lunds Universitet.
11. Brown, J. and Duguid, P. (2002) Local knowledge: Innovation in the networked age Management Learning, 33, pp. 427-437.
12. Castells, M. and Hall, P.(1994) Technopoles of the World: The Making of 21st Century Industrial Complexes. London: Routledge.
13. Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship (CIE). (2005) OH Presentation. Available at: http://www.liu.se/org/cie/1 (accessed 25 April, 2005)
14. Cooke, P.(1998) Introduction: Origins of the concept. In Regional Innovation Systems. London: UCL Press.
15. Cooke, P. (2001a) Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, pp. 945-974.
16. Cooke, P. (2001b) From technopoles to regional innovation systems: The evolution of localized technology development policy Canadian Journal of Regional Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences Regionales, XXIV(1), pp. 21-40.
17. Currie, J.(1985) Science Parks in Britain - Their Role in the 1980s. Cardif: CSP Economic Publications.
18. Doloreux, D. (1999) Technopoles et trajectoires stratégiques: Le cas de la ville de Laval (Québec) Cahiers de Géographie du Québec, 43, pp. 211-235.
19. Doloreux, D. and Hommen, L. and Edquist, C. (2004) Nordic regional innovation systems: An analysis of the region of East Gothia, Sweden Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 27, pp. 1-27.
20. Doutriaux, J.(1998) Canadian science park, universities and regional development. In Local and Regional Innovation System. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
21. Druihle, C. and Garnsey, E. (2000) Emergence and growth of high-tech activity in Cambridge and Grenoble Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12, pp. 163-177.
22. Edquist, C.(1999) Teknikbrostiftesen i Linköping: En Utvärdering av dess Roll som Offentlig Sådfinansiär i det Regionala Innovationsystemet. Linköping: Teknikbrostiftesen i Linköping. (Technology Bridging Foundation in Linköping: An Evaluation of its Role as Public Seed-financier in the Regional Innovation System)
23. Edquist, C. and Texier, F. and Widmark, N.(1998) The East Gothia Regional System of Innovation: A Descriptive Pre-study. Department of Technology and Social Change, Linköping University. Working paper no. 199
24. Eisenhardt, K. (1989) Building theories from case study research Academy of Management Review, 14, pp. 532-550.
25. Etzkowitz, H. and Klofsten, M.(2002). Entrepreneurship and innovation: Toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. Paper presented at the 4th Triple Helix Conference CopenhagenNovember6-9. In [pp.].
26. Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L. (2000) The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations? Research Policy, 29, pp. 109-123.
27. Eul, F.(1985) Science parks and innovation centres - property, the unconsidered element. In Science Parks and Innovation Centres - Their Economic and Social Impact. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
28. Feldman, J.(2002) Incubating a Science Park: The Origins of Berzelius Science Park and Medical Industrial Cluster Development in Linköping, Sweden. Linköping: Center for Municipality Studies, Linköping University. Working Paper Number 14
29. Feldman, J. and Associates. (2005) Systems of Regional Inclusion. Report for RISESI work-package 6, Labour market divisions. Available at http://www.risesi.org (accessed 15 March, 2005)
30. Feldman, J. and Hommen, L. and Gray, M. and De Laurentis, C. and Rondinella, T. (2005) The regional impact of the information society on employment and integration: Summary report. Available at http://www.risesi.org (accessed 15 March, 2005)
31. Florida, R.(2003) The learning region. In Regional Innovation, Knowledge and Global Change. London: Thomson Learning.
32. Heydebreck, P. and Klofsten, M. and Maier, C. (2000a) Innovation support for new technology-based firms: The Swedish Teknopol approach R&D Management, 30, pp. 89-100.
33. Heydebreck, P. and Gabrielsson, N. and Reed, B. and Mårtensson, L. (2000b) Innovation Support Services - A Study of Companies' Needs and the Supply in Östergötland. Linköping: Östergötland County Administrative Board. Stage 1 report, RITTS (Regional Innovation and Technology Transfer Strategies and Infrastructure) East Sweden - RITTS 4419
34. ITPS. (2001) Elektronikindustri och IT-relaterade företag, 1999 (Electronics Industries and IT-related Businesses, 1999). Östersund: Institutet för tillväxtpolitiska studier ITPS.
35. ITPS. (2003) Elektronikindustri och IT-relaterade företag, 2001 (Electronics Industries and IT-related Businesses, 2001). Östersund: Institutet för tillväxtpolitiska studier ITPS.
36. Jones-Evans, D. and Klofsten, M. (1997) Universities and local economic development: The case of Linköping European Planning Studies, 5, pp. 77-94.
37. Klofsten, M. and Jones-Evans, D. (1996) Stimulation of technology-based small firms: A case study of university-industry cooperation Technovation, 16(4), pp. 187-193.
38. Klofsten, M. and Jones-Evans, D. and Schärberg, C. (1999) Growing the Linköping Technopole - a longitudinal study of triple helix development in Sweden Journal of Technology Transfer, 24, pp. 125-138.
39. Komninos, N.(1998) After technopoles. In Innovation, Networks and Learning Regions?. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
40. Lindholm-Dahlstrand, Å.(2004) Teknikbaserat entreprenörskap (Technology-based Entrpreneurship). Gothenburg: Department of Industrial Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology.
41. Lindholm-Dahlstrand, Å. and Klofsten, M.(2002) Growth and innovation support in Swedish science parks and incubators. In New Technology-based Firms in the New Millennium Vol. 2. Oxford: Pergamon.
42. Lindelöf, P. and Löfsten, H. (2003) Science park location and new technology-based firms in Sweden: Implications for strategy and performance Small Business Economics, 20, pp. 245-258.
43. Link, A. (2003) On the Growth of U.S. Science Parks Journal of Technology Transfer, 28, pp. 81-85.
44. Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992) National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
45. Löfsten, H. and Lindelöf, P. (2001) Science parks in Sweden - industrial renewal and development? R&D Management, 31, pp. 309-322.
46. Löfsten, H. and Lindelöf, P. (2002) Science parks and the growth of new technology-based firms: Academics-industry links, innovation and markets Research Policy, 31, pp. 859-876.
47. Löfsten, H. and Lindelöf, P. (2003) Determinants for an entrepreneurial milieu: Science parks and business policy in growing firms Technovation, 23, pp. 51-64.
48. Malecki, E. (1997) Technology and Economic Development. Edinburgh: Longman.
49. Manzagol, C. and Doloreux, D. (1999) La dynamique technopolitaine au Québec: Quelques constats Revue de la Société Géographique de Liège, 36, pp. 103-109.
50. Massard, N.(1998) Territoires et politiques technologiques: Comparaisons régionales. Paris: L'Harmattan.
51. Massey, D. and Quintas, P. and Wield, D.(1992) High-tech Fantaisies. London: Routledge.
52. Mjärdevi Business Incubator AB. (2005). Available at http://www.incubator.se/ (accessed 1 March, 2005)
53. Mjärdevi Science Park AB. (2002). Available at http://www.Mjardevi.se/english.xml (accessed 2 March, 2005)
54. Mjärdevi Science Park AB. (2005). Available at http://www.mjardevi.se/opencms/msp/en/index.html (accessed 3 March, 2005)
55. Monck, C. and Porter, R. and Quintas, P. and Storey, D. and Wynarczyck, P.(1988) Science Parks and the Growth of High Technology Firms. London: Croom Helm.
56. Nijkamp, P. and van Oirschot, G. and Oosterman, A.(1994) Knowledge networks, science parks and regional development: An international comparative analysis of critical success factors. In Moving the Frontiers: Economic Restructuring, Regional Development and Emerging Networks. Ashgate: Avebury.
57. Phillimore, J. (1999) Beyond the linear view of innovation in science park evaluation: An analysis of Western Australian Technology Park Technovation, 19, pp. 673-680.
58. Phillips, R. (2002) Technology business incubators: How effective as technology transfer mechanisms? Technology in Society, pp. 299-316.
59. Quéré, M.(1998) Les technopoles et la notion de politique technologique régionale. In Territoires et politiques technologiques: Comparaisons régionales. Paris: L'Harmattan.
60. Reed, B.(2000) Appendix to stage 1 report, RITTS (Regional Innovation and Technology Transfer Strategies and Infrastructure) East Sweden - RITTS 4419. In Innovation Support Services - Supply Side Analysis. Linköping: Östergötland County Administrative Board.
61. Shearmur, R. and Doloreux, D. (2000) Science parks: Actors or reactors? Canadian science parks in their urban context Environment and Planning A, 32, pp. 1065-1082.
62. Siegel, D. and Westhead, P. and Wright, M. (2003) Science parks and the performance of new technology-based firms: A review of recent UK evidence and an agenda for future research Small Business Economics, 20, pp. 177-184.
63. Stankiewicz, R.(1998) Science parks and innovation centers. In Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia. New York: State University of New York Press.
64. Steffensen, M. and Rogers, E. and Speakman, K. (2000) Spin-offs from research centers at a research university Journal of Business Venturing, 1, pp. 93-111.
65. Stockholm. (2000) Kista Science City - From Vision to Reality. Stockholm: City of Stockholm.
66. Teknikbrostiftelsen i Linköping. (2005). Available at http://www.teknikbron.org/ (accessed 15 April, 2005)
67. Varsakelis, N. and Kessapidou, S. (2003) National culture and its impact on the choice of managing director in international production: The case of foreign firms in Greece International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, pp. 285-295.
68. Vedovello, C. (1997) Science parks and university-industry interaction: Geographical proximity between the agents as a driving force Technovation, 17(9), pp. 491-502.
69. Westhead, P. (1997) Inputs and outputs of technology-based firms located on and off science parks R&D Management Journal, 27, pp. 45-62.