Theoretical foundation to estimate the relative efficiencies of the Jukes-Cantor+gamma model and the Jukes-Cantor model in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree

Gene

Volumn 385, Issue , 2006, Pages 103-110

  Som, Anup ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer simulation; Evolutionary distance; Four point condition; Phylogenetics inference; Probability distribution

Indexed keywords

NUCLEOTIDE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC MODEL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; THEORETICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 37849185792     PISSN: 03781119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2006.03.027     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bulmer M. Use of the method of generalized least squares in reconstructing phylogenies from sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 8 (1991) 868-883
2. Buneman P. The recovery of trees from measurements of dissimilarity. In: Hodson F.R., Kendall D.G., and T autu P. (Eds). Mathematica in the Archeological and Historical Sciences (1971), Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh 387-395
3. Cavalli-Sforza L.L., and Edwards A.W.F. Phylogenetics analysis: models and estimation procedures. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 19 (1967) 233-257
4. Felsenstein J. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27 (1978) 401-410
5. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP-Phylogeny Inference Package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5 (1989) 164-166
6. Fitch W.M., and Margoliash E. Construction of phylogenetics trees. Science 155 (1967) 279-284
7. Gojobori T., Ishii K., and Nei M. Estimation of average number of nucleotide substitutions when the rate of substitution varies with nucleotide. J. Mol. Evol. 18 (1982) 414-423
8. Hasewaga M., Kishino H., and Yano T. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22 (1985) 160-174
9. Huelsenbeck J.P. Is the Felsenstein zone a fly trap?. Syst. Biol. 42 (1997) 247-264
10. Jukes T.H., and Cantor C.R. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro H.N. (Ed). Mammalian Protein Metabolism (1969), Academic Press, New York 21-132
11. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16 (1980) 111-120
12. Kimura M. Estimation of evolutionary distances between homologous nucleotide sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 78 (1981) 454-458
13. Kimura M., and Ohta T. On the stochastic model for estimation of mutational distance between homologous proteins. J. Mol. Evol. 2 (1972) 87-90
14. Kumar S., and Gadagkar S.R. Efficiency of the neighbor-joining method in reconstructing deep and shallow evolutionary relationships in large phylogenies. J. Mol. Evol. 51 (2000) 544-553
15. Lanave C., Preparata G., Saccone C., and Serio G. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J. Mol. Evol. 20 (1984) 86-93
16. Li W.H. Molecular Evolution (1997), Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA, USA
17. Nei M., and Gojobori T. Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and non-synonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3 (1986) 418-426
18. Oehlert G.W. A note on the delta method. Am. Stat. 46 (1992) 2729
19. Owen D.B. Table for computing bivariate normal probabilities. Ann. Math. Stat. 27 (1956) 1075-1090
20. Rambaut A., and Grassly N. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13 (1997) 235-238
21. Rzhetsky A., and Nei M. Statistical properties of the ordinary least-squares, generalized least-squares, and minimum-evolution methods of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol. 35 (1992) 367-375
22. Saitou N., and Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4 (1987) 406-425
23. Schulmeister S. Inconsistency of maximum parsimony revisited. Syst. Biol. 53 (2004) 521-528
24. Sourdis J., and Krimbas C. Accuracy of phylogenetic trees estimated from DNA sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4 (1987) 159-166
25. Swofford D.L., Olsen G.J., Waddell P.J., and Hillis D.M. Phylogenetic inference. In: Hillis D.M., Moritz C., and Mable B.K. (Eds). Molecular Systematics. 2nd edition (1996), Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass. 407-514
26. Tajima F., and Nei M. Estimation of evolutionary distance between nucleotide sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1 (1984) 269-285
27. Tajima F., and Takezaki N. Estimation of evolutionary distance for reconstructing molecular phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11 (1994) 278-286
28. Takahashi K., and Nei M. Efficiencies of fast algorithms of phylogenetic inference under the criteria of maximum parsimony, minimum evolution, and maximum likelihood when a large number of sequences are used. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17 (2000) 1251-1258
29. Takahata N., and Kimura M. A model of evolutionary base substitutions and its application with special reference to rapid change of pseudogenes. Genetics 98 (1981) 641-657
30. Yang Z. Maximum likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10 (1993) 1396-1401
31. Yang Z., Goldman N., and Friday A.E. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11 (1994) 316-324
32. Zharkikh A. Estimation of evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 39 (1994) 315-329