Separating true positive predicted residue contacts from false positive ones in mainly α proteins, using constrained Metropolis MC simulations

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 539-552

  Vicatos, Spyridon ^a,b   Kaznessis, Yiannis N ^a,b  

^a University of Minnesota   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Contact map; Fold prediction; Metropolis Monte Carlo; Proximal residues; Residue constraints

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; METROPOLIS MONTE CARLO METHOD; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SCORING SYSTEM; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BINDING SITES; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 37849020151     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21553     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Goebel U, Sander C, Schneider R, Valencia A. Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins 1994;18:309-317.
2. Olmea O, Valencia A. Improving contact predictions by the combination of correlated mutations and other sources of sequence information. Fold Des 1997;2:S25-S32.
3. Fariselli P, Olmea O, Valencia A, Casadio R. Prediction of contact maps with neural networks and correlated mutations. Protein Eng 2001;14:835-843.
4. Vicatos S, Reddy BV, Kaznessis Y. Prediction of distant residue contacts with the use of evolutionary information. Proteins 2005;58:935-949.
5. Fariselli P, Olmea O, Valencia A, Casadio R. Progress in predicting inter-residue contacts of proteins with neural networks and correlated mutations. Proteins 2002 (Suppl. 5):157-162.
6. Singer MS, Vriend G, Bywater RP. Prediction of protein residue contacts with a PDB-derived likelihood matrix. Protein Eng 2002; 15:721-725.
7. Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJ, Meyer EF, Jr., Brice MD, Rodgers JR, Kennard O, Shimanouchi T, Tasumi M. The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 1977;112:535-542.
8. Grana O, Baker D, MacCallum RM, Meiler J, Punta M, Rost B, Tress ML, Valencia A. CASP6 assessment of contact prediction. Proteins 2005;61 (Suppl 7):214-224.
9. Moult J, Pedersen JT, Judson R, Fidelis K. A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods. Proteins 1995;23:ii-v.
10. MacCallum RM. Striped sheets and protein contact prediction. Bioinformatics 2004;20(Suppl. 1):I224-I231.
11. Punta M, Rost B. PROFcon: novel prediction of long-range contacts. Bioinformatics 2005;21:2960-2968.
12. Vasquez M, Nemethy G, Scheraga HA. Conformational energy calculations on polypeptides and proteins. Chem Rev 1994;94:2183-2239.
13. Frauenfelder H, Sligar SG, Wolynes PG. The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. Science 1991;254:1598-1603.
14. Kidera A. Enhanced conformational sampling in Monte Carlo simulations of proteins: application to a constrained peptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995;92:9886-9889.
15. Ortiz AR, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Tertiary structure prediction of the KIX domain of CBP using Monte Carlo simulations driven by restraints derived from multiple sequence alignments. Proteins 1998;30:287-294.
16. Fariselli P, Casadio R. A neural network based predictor of residue contacts in proteins. Protein Eng 1999;12:15-21.
17. Fariselli P, Olmea O, Valencia A, Casadio R. Prediction of contact maps with neural networks and correlated mutations. Protein Eng 2001;14:835-843.
18. Thomas DJ, Casari G, Sander C. The prediction of protein contacts from multiple sequence alignments. Protein Eng 1996;9:941-948.
19. Karlin S, Zuker M, Brocchieri L. Measuring residue association in protein structures possible implications for protein folding. J Mol Biol 1994;239:227-248.
20. Sonnhammer EL, Eddy SR, Durbin R. Pfam: a comprehensive database of protein domain families based on seed alignments. Proteins 1997;28:405-420.
21. Ortiz AR, Kolinski A, Rotkiewicz P, Ilkowski B, Skolnick J. Ab initio folding of proteins using restraints derived from evolutionary information. Proteins 1999 (Suppl. 3):177-185.
22. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 1983;4:187-217.
23. Crivelli S, Kreylos O, Hamann B, Max N, Bethel W. ProteinShop: a tool for interactive protein manipulation and steering. J ComputAided Mol Des 2004;18:271-285.
24. Huang ES, Subbiah S, Levitt M. Recognizing native folds by the arrangement of hydrophobic and polar residues. J Mol Biol 1995; 252:709-720.
25. Huang ES, Subbiah S, Tsai J, Levitt M. Using a hydrophobic contact potential to evaluate native and near-native folds generated by molecular dynamics simulations. J Mol Biol 1996;257:716-725.
26. Ortiz AR, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Nativelike topology assembly of small proteins using predicted restraints in Monte Carlo folding simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:1020-1025.
27. Ortiz AR, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Fold assembly of small proteins using Monte Carlo simulations driven by restraints derived from multiple sequence alignments. J Mol Biol 1998;277:419-448.