Irritant contact dermatitis: A review

Australasian Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-11

  Slodownik, Dan ^a   Lee, Adriene ^b   Nixon, Rosemary ^a,c  

^a SKIN AND CANCER FOUNDATION   (Australia)

^b MONASH MEDICAL CENTRE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Allergy; Atopy; Cumulative; Difficulty in diagnosis; Hand; Occupational; Persistent postoccupational; Work

Indexed keywords

CELL ADHESION MOLECULE; CORTICOSTEROID; CYTOKINE; IRRITANT AGENT; MACROLIDE; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN CLASS 2; PROTECTIVE AGENT; STRONTIUM; STRONTIUM SALT; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ATOPY; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTACT DERMATITIS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GRENZ RADIATION; HAND; HUMAN; IMMUNE SYSTEM; INFLAMMATION; IRRITANT DERMATITIS; KERATINOCYTE; OCCUPATIONAL ECZEMA; OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE; PATCH TEST; PATHOGENESIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTOTHERAPY; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SKIN CARE; T LYMPHOCYTE; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE;

ADULT; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DERMATITIS, ATOPIC; DERMATITIS, IRRITANT; DERMATITIS, OCCUPATIONAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IRRITANTS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RISK FACTORS; SKIN;

EID: 37849005424     PISSN: 00048380     EISSN: 14400960     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2007.00409.x     Document Type: Review

References (94)

1. Marks JG, Elsner P, Deleo V (eds). Allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. In: Contact and Occupational Dermatology. St Louis: Mosby, 2002 3 12.
2. Wigger-Alberti W, Elsner P. Contact dermatitis due to irritation. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI (eds). Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2000 99 110.
3. Weltfriend S, Ramon M, Maibach HI. Irritant dermatitis (irritation). In: Zhai H, Maibach HI (eds). Dermatotoxicology. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2004 181 228.
4. Dickel H, Kuss O, Schmidt A, KretZ. J, Diepgen TL. Importance of irritant dermatitis in occupational skin disease. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 2002 3: 283 9.
5. Jungbauer FHW, Lensen GJ, Groothoff JW, Coenraads PJ. Exposure of the hands to wet work in nurses. Contact Dermatitis 2004 50: 225 9.
6. Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Toikkanen J, Tarvainen K, Estlander T. Statistics on occupational dermatoses in Finland. Curr. Probl. Dermatol. 1995 23: 28 40.
7. Babu RJ, Chatterjee A, Ahaghotu E, Singh M. Percutaneous absorption and skin irritation upon low level dermal exposure to nonane, dodecane and tetradecane in hairless rats. Toxicol. Ind. Health 2004 20: 109 18.
8. Fartasch M, Schnetz E, Diepgen T. Characterization of detergent-induced barrier alterations - effect of barrier cream on irritation. J. Investig. Dermatol. Symp. Proc. 1998 3: 121 7.
9. Grubauer G, Elias PM, Feingold KR. Transepidermal water loss: the signal for recovery of barrier and function. J. Lipid Res. 1989 30: 323 33.
10. Aramaki J, Loffler C, Kawana S, Effendy I, Happle R, Loffler H. Irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulphate: interrelation between concentration and exposure time. Br. J. Dermatol. 2001 145: 704 8.
11. McFadden JP, Holloway DB, Whittle EG, Basketter DA. Benzalkonium chloride neutralizes the irritant effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate. Contact Dermatitis 2000 43: 264 6.
12. Effendy I, Weltfriend S, Patil S, Maibach HI. Differential irritant skin responses to topical retinoic acid and sodium lauryl sulphate: alone and in crossover design. Br. J. Dermatol. 1996 134: 424 30.
13. Fluhr JW, Bankova L, Fuchs S, Kelterer D, Schliemann-Willers S, Norgauer J, Kleesz. P, Grieshaber R, Elsner P. Fruit acids and sodium hydroxide in the food industry and their combined effect with sodium lauryl sulphate: controlled in vivo tandem irritation study. Br. J. Dermatol. 2004 151: 1039 48.
14. Fluhr JW, Kelterer D, Fuchs S, Kaatz M, Kleesz P, Elsner P. Additive impairment of the barrier function and irritation by biogenic amines and sodium lauryl sulphate: a controlled in vivo tandem irritation study. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 2005 18: 88 97.
15. Schliemann-Willers S, Fuchs S, Kleesz P, Grieshaber R, Elsner P. Fruit acids do not enhance sodium lauryl sulphate-induced cumulative irritant contact dermatitis in vivo. Acta Dermatol. Venereol. 2005 85: 206 10.
16. Heinemann C, Paschold C, Fluhr J, Wigger-Alberti W, Schliemann-Willer S, Farwanah H, Raith K, Neubert K, Elsner P. Induction of a hardening phenomenon by repeated application of SLS. analysis of lipid changes in the stratum corneum. Acta Dermatol. Venereol. 2005 85: 290 5.
17. Morris-Jones R, Robertson SJ, Ross JS, White IR, McFadden JP, Rycroft RJ. Dermatitis caused by physical irritants. Br. J. Dermatol. 2002 147: 270 5.
18. Hu CH. Sweat-related dermatoses: old concept and new scenario. Dematologica 1991 182: 73 6.
19. Yoshikawa N, Imokawa G, Akimoto K, Jin K, Higaki Y, Kawashima M. Regional analysis of ceramides within the stratum corneum in relation to seasonal changes. Dermatology 1994 188: 207 14.
20. Larmi E, Lahti A, Hannuksela M. Effect of ultraviolet B on nonimmunologic contact reactions induced by dimethyl sulphoxide, phenol and sodium lauryl sulphate. Photodermatol. 1989 6: 258 62.
21. Berardesca E, Distante F. The modulation of skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis 1994 31: 281 7.
22. Wilhelm KP, Pasche F, Surber C. Sodium hydroxide induced subclinical irritation. Acta Dermatol. Venereol. (Stockh.) 1990 70: 463 7.
23. Allen MH, Wakelin SH, Holloway D, Lisby S, Baadsgard O, Barker JN, McFadden JP. Association of TNFA gene polymorphism at position 308 with susceptibility to irritant contact dermatitis. Immunogenetics 2000 51: 201 5.
24. Cua AB, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI. Cutaneous SLS irritation potential: age and regional variability. Br. J. Dermatol. 1990 123: 607 13.
25. Schwindt DA, Wilhelm KP, Miller DL, Maibach HI. Cumulative irritation in older and younger skin: a comparison. Acta Dermatol. Venereol. 1998 78: 279 83.
26. Robinson MK. Population differences in acute skin irritation responses. Race, sex, age, sensitive skin and repeat subject comparisons. Contact Dermatitis 2002 46: 86 93.
27. Rougier A, Dupuis D, Lotte C, Roguet R, Wester RC, Maibach HI. Regional variation in percutaneous absorption in man: measurement by the stripping method. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 1986 278: 465 9.
28. Marakchi S, Maibach HI. Sodium lauryl sulphate-induced irritation in the human face: regional and age-related differences. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 2006 19: 177 80.
29. Effendy I, Loeffler H, Maibach HI. Baseline transepidermal water loss in patients with acute and healed irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1995 33: 371 4.
30. Tupker RA. Prediction of irritancy in the human skin irritancy model and occupational setting. Contact Dermatitis 2003 49: 61 9.
31. Tupker RA, Coenraads P, Fidler V, de Jong MCJM, van der Meer JB, Monchy JGR. Irritant susceptibility and weal and flare reactions to bioactive agents in atopic dermatitis. I. Influence of disease severity. Br. J. Dermatol. 1995 133: 358 64.
32. Shahidullah M, Raffle EJ, Rimmer AR, Frain-Bell W. Transepidermal water loss in patients with dermatitis. Br. J. Dermatol. 1969 817: 22 30.
33. Tupker RA, Pinnagoda J, Coenraads PJ, Nater JP. The influence of repeated exposure to surfactants on the human skin as determined by transepidermal water loss and visual scoring. Contact Dermatitis 1989 20: 108 14.
34. Dickel H, Bruckner TM, Schimdt A, Diepgen TL. Impact of atopic skin diathesis on occupational skin disease incidence in a working population. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2003 121: 37 40.
35. Saunders H, Keegel T, Nixon R, Frowen K. Career counsellors and occupational contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2003 48: 189 90.
36. Skin at work: Information for school leavers Occupational Dermatology Research and Education Centre, at http://www.occderm.asn.au (2007). (Accessed 20 June 2007.)
37. Nassif A, Chan SC, Storrs FJ, Hanifin JM. Abnormal skin irritancy in atopic dermatitis and in atopy without dermatitis. Arch. Dermatol. 1994 130: 1402 7.
38. Conti A, Di Nardo A, Seidenary S. No alteration of biophysical parameters in the skin of subjects with respiratory atopy. Dermatology 1996 192: 317 20.
39. Klein G, Grubauer G, Fritsch P. The influence of daily dish-washing with synthetic detergent on human skin. Br. J. Dermatol. 1992 127: 131 7.
40. Levin CY, Maibach HI. Irritant contact dermatitis: is there an immunologic component? Int. Immunopharmacol. 2002 2: 183 9.
41. Effendy I, Loffler H, Maibach HI. Epidermal cytokines in murine cutaneous irritant responses. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2000 20: 335 41.
42. Hunziker T, Brand CU, Kapp A, Waelti ER, Braathen LR. Increased levels of inflammatory cytokines in human skin lymph derived from sodium lauryl sulphate-induced contact dermatitis. Br. J. Dermatol. 1992 127: 254 7.
43. Enk AH, Katz SI. Early molecular events in the induction phase of contact sensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992 89: 1398 402.
44. Eberhard Y, Ortiz S, Ruiz Lascano A, Kuznitzky R, Serra HM. Up-regulation of the chemokine CCL21 in the skin of subjects exposed to irritants. BMC Immunol. 2004 26: 7.
45. Piguet PF, Grau GE, Hauser C, Vassalli P. Tumor necrosis factor is a critical mediator in hapten induced irritant and contact hypersensitivity reactions. J. Exp. Med. 1991 173: 673 9.
46. Pitzalis C, Cauli A, Pipitone N, Smith C, Barker J, Marchesini A, Yanni G, Panayi GS. Cutaneous lymphocyte antigen-positive T lymphocytes preferentially migrate to the skin but not to the joint in psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1996 39: 137 45.
47. Santamaria LF, Perez Soler MT, Hauser C, Blaser K. Allergen specificity and endothelial transmigration of T cells in allergic contact dermatitis and atopic dermatitis are associated with the cutaneous lymphocyte antigen. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 1995 107: 359 62.
48. Lisby S, Baadsgaard O. Mechanisms of irritant contact dermatitis. In: Frosch PJ, Menne T, Lepoittevin, JP (eds). Contact Dermatitis. Berlin: Springer, 2006 69 80.
49. Malten KE, den Arend J, Wiggers RE. Delayed irritation: hexandiol diacrylate and butandiol diacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 1979 5: 178 84.
50. Amin S, Baran R, Maibach HI. Sensitive skin: what is it? In: Baran R, Maibach HI (eds). Textbook of Cosmetic Dermatology. London: Martin Dunitz, 1998 343 9.
51. Charbonnier V Jr., Morrison BM, Paye M, Maibach HI. Subclinical, non-erythematous irritation with an open assay model (washing): sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) versus sodium laureth sulfate (SLES). Food Chem. Toxicol. 2001 39: 279 86.
52. Malten KE. Thoughts on irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1981 7: 238 47.
53. English JS. Current concepts of irritant contact dermatitis. Occup. Environ. Med. 2004 61: 722 6.
54. Mathias CG. Post-traumatic eczema. Dermatol. Clin. 1988 6: 35 42.
55. Simon M, Bernard D, Minodo AM. Persistence of both peripheral and non-peripheral corneodesmosomes in the upper stratum corneum of winter xerosis skin versus only peripheral in normal skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2001 116: 23 30.
56. Holden CA, Berth-Jones J. Eczema, lichenification, prurigo and erythroderma. In: Burns T, Breathnach S, Cox N, Griffiths C (eds). Rook's Textbook of Dermatology, Vol. 1, 7th edn. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2004 17.1 17. 55 (17.16 17).
57. Samitz MH. Repeated mechanical trauma to the skin: occupational aspects. Am. J. Ind. Med. 1985 8: 265 71.
58. McMullen E, Gawkrodger DJ. Physical friction is under-recognized as an irritant that can cause or contribute to contact dermatitis. Br. J. Dermatol. 2006 154: 154 6.
59. Perrenoud D, Homberger HP, Auderset PC, Emmenegger R, Frenk E, Saurat JH, Hauser C. An epidemic outbreak of papular and follicular contact dermatitis to tocopheryl linoleate in cosmetics. Dermatology 1994 189: 225 33.
60. Andersen KE, Petri M. Occupational irritant contact folliculitis associated with triphenyl tin fluoride exposure. Contact Dermatitis 1982 8: 173 7.
61. Storrs FJ, White CR. False-positive 'poral' cobalt patch test reaction reside in the eccrine acrosyringium. Cutis 2000 65: 49 53.
62. Wall LM, Gebauer KA. A follow-up study of occupational skin disease in Western Australia. Contact Dermatitis 1991 24: 41 3.
63. Sajjacharenpong P, Cahill J, Keegel T, Saunders H, Nixon R. Persistent post-occupational dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2004 51: 278 83.
64. Vermulen R, Stewart P, Kromhout H. Dermal exposure assessment in occupational epidemiologic research. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 2002 28: 371 85.
65. Holness DL. Health care services use by workers with work-related contact dermatitis. Dermatitis 2004 15: 18 24.
66. Wilhelm KP, Pasche F, Surber C. Sodium hydroxide-induced subclinical irritation. A test for evaluating stratum corneum barrier function. Acta Dermatol. Venereol. (Stock.) 1990 70: 463 7.
67. Astner S, Gonzalez S, Gonzalez E. Noninvasive evaluation of allergic and irritant contact dermatitis by in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy. Dermatitis 2006 17: 182 91.
68. Lewis FM, Cork MJ, McDonagh AJ, Gawkrodger DJ. An audit of the value of patch testing: the patient's perspective. Contact Dermatitis 1994 30: 214 16.
69. Paul MA, Fleischer AB, Sheretz EF. Patient's benefit from contact dermatitis evaluation: results of a follow-up study. Am. J. Contact Dermat. 1995 6: 63 6.
70. Rajagopalan R, Anderson R. Impact of patch testing on dermatology-specific quality of life in patients with allergic contact dermatitis. Am. J. Contact Dermatitis 1997 8: 215 21.
71. Rietschel RL. Human and economic impact of allergic contact dermatitis and the role of patch testing. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1995 33: 812 15.
72. Goulden V, Wilkinson SM. Evaluation of a contact allergy clinic. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2000 25: 67 70.
73. Ormond P, Hazelwood E, Bourke B, Lyons JF, Bourke JF. The importance of a dedicated patch test clinic. Br. J. Dermatol. 2002 146: 304 7.
74. Soni BP, SheretZ. EF. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic. Am. J. Contact Dermatitis 1997 8: 10 14.
75. Bhusan M, Beck MH. An audit to identify the optimum referral rate to a contact dermatitis investigation unit. Br. J. Dermatol. 1999 141: 570 2.
76. Kwon S, Campbell LS, Zirwas MJ. Role of protective gloves in the causation and treatment of occupational irritant contact dermatitis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2006 55: 891 6.
77. Tucker SB. Prevention of occupational skin disease. Dermatologic Clinics 1988 6: 87 96.
78. Le TK, DeMon P, Schalkwijk J, van der Valk PG. Effect of a topical corticosteroid, a retinoid and a vitamin D3 derivative on sodium dodecyl sulphate induced skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis 1997 37: 19 26.
79. Levin C, Zhai H, Bashir S, Chew AL, Anigbogu A, Stern R, Maibach HI. Efficacy of corticosteroids in acute experimental irritant contact dermatitis? Skin Res. Technol. 2001 7: 214 18.
80. Kao JS, Fluhr JW, Man MQ, Fowler AJ, Hachem JP, Crumrine D, Ahn SK, Brown BE, Elias PM, Feingold KR. Short-term glucocorticoid treatment compromises both permeability barrier homeostasis and stratum corneum integrity: inhibition of epidermal lipid synthesis accounts for functional abnormalities. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2003 120: 456 64.
81. Ahn SK, Bak HN, Park BD, Kim YH, Youm JK, Choi EH, Hong SP, Lee SH. Effects of a multilamellar emulsion on glucocorticoid-induced epidermal atrophy and barrier impairment. J. Dermatol. 2006 33: 80 90.
82. Loden M. Barrier recovery and influence of irritant stimuli in skin treated with a moisturizing cream. Contact Dermatitis 1997 36: 256 60.
83. Yokota M, Maibach HI. Moisturizer effect on irritant dermatitis: an overview. Contact Dermatitis 2006 55: 65 72.
84. Ghadialli R, Halkier-Sorensen L, Elias P. Effects of petrolatum on stratum corneum structure and function. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1992 26: 387 96.
85. Smith C. New approaches to topical therapy. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2000 25: 567 74.
86. Levin C, Maibach HI. Do cool water or physiologic saline compresses enhance resolution of experimentally-induced irritant contact dermatitis? Contact Dermatitis 2001 45: 146 50.
87. Yoshizawa Y, Tanojo H, Kim SJ, Maibach HI. Sea water or its components alter experimental irritant dermatitis in man. Skin Res. Technol. 2001 7: 36 9.
88. Hahn GH. Strontium is a potent and selective inhibitor of sensory irritation. Dermatol. Surg. 1999 25: 689 94.
89. Chouinard N, Therrien JP, Mitchell DL, Robert M, Drouin R, Rouabhia M. Repeated exposures of human skin equivalent to low doses of ultraviolet-B radiation lead to changes in cellular functions and accumulation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2001 79: 507 15.
90. Simons JR, Bohnen IJ, van der Valk PG. A left-right comparison of UVB phototherapy and topical photochemotherapy in bilateral chronic hand dermatitis after 6 weeks' treatment. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 1997 22: 7 10.
91. Lindelof B, Wrangsjo K, Liden S. A double-blind study of Grenz ray therapy in chronic eczema of the hands. Br. J. Dermatol. 1987 117: 77 80.
92. Choi JM, Lee JY, Cho BK. Chronic irritant contact dermatitis: Recovery time in man. Contact Dermatitis 2000 42: 264 9.
93. John SM, Skudlik C. [New forms of management in dermatology. Integrated in-patient-out-patient prevention of severe occupational dermatoses: cornerstones for an effective integrated management in clinics and practices]. Gesundheitswesen 2006 68: 769 74. (In German.)
94. Moyle M, Keegel T, Noonan A, Nixon R. Skin care in occupational contact dermatitis of the hands. Australas. J. Dermatol. 2006 47: 97 101.