Shot noise of spin current

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 15, 2004, Pages

  Wang, Baigeng ^a,b   Wang, Jian ^a,c   Guo, Hong ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c INSTITUTE OF SOLID STATE PHYSICS   (China)

^d MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NOISE; PARAMETER; SPECTRUM; TECHNIQUE; THEORETICAL MODEL; TRANSPORT KINETICS;

EID: 37649031758     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.153301     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. For recent reviews, see, for example, Ya.M. Blanter and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rep. 336, 1 (2000).
2. M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B 46, 12 485 (1992).
3. L. Saminadayar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2526 (1997).
4. M.P. Anantram and S. Datta, Phys. Rev. B 53, 16 390 (1996); P. Samuelsson and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 046601 (2002); B.G. Wang and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 67, 014509 (2003).
5. M.P. Anantram and S. Datta, Phys. Rev. B 53, 16 390 (1996); P. Samuelsson and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 046601 (2002); B.G. Wang and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 67, 014509 (2003).
6. M.P. Anantram and S. Datta, Phys. Rev. B 53, 16 390 (1996); P. Samuelsson and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 046601 (2002); B.G. Wang and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 67, 014509 (2003).
7. M. Henny et al., Science 284, 296 (1999).
8. F. Lefloch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 067002 (2003).
9. M.J. Stevens et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 136603 (2003); J. Hübner et al., ibid. 90, 216601 (2003).
10. M.J. Stevens et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 136603 (2003); J. Hübner et al., ibid. 90, 216601 (2003).
11. A. Brataas et al., Phys. Rev. B 66, 060404 (2002).
12. P. Sharma and C. Chamon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 096401 (2001); E.R. Mucciolo et al., ibid. 89, 146802 (2002).
13. P. Sharma and C. Chamon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 096401 (2001); E.R. Mucciolo et al., ibid. 89, 146802 (2002).
14. B.G. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. B 67, 092408 (2003).
15. Q.-f. Sun et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 258301 (2003).
16. G. Burkard et al., Phys. Rev. B 61, 16 303 (2000).
17. A.P. Jauho et al., Phys. Rev. B 50, 5528 (1994).
18. The reason that there are two resonant states is because when field γ is turned on, the spin degeneracy of the original state ε is broken. Two resonant states are then found at ε±γ-iΓ/2 with level spacing 2γ and half-width Γ/2. Depending on the ranges of parameters γ relative to Γ, the two resonance states may or may not overlap, resulting in one or two dips in the noise.
19. A.H. Steinback et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3806 (1996).
20. L.-H. Reydellet et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 176803 (2003).