Chaotic Dot-Superconductor Analog of the Hanbury Brown–Twiss Effect

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 89, Issue 4, 2002, Pages

  Samuelsson, P ^a   Buttiker M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACKSCATTERING; MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; POINT CONTACTS; SEMICONDUCTOR JUNCTIONS; SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS; SUPERCONDUCTING MATERIALS;

CHAOTIC DOT; HANBURY BROWN-TWISS EFFECT; POSITIVE CORRELATION;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 4243961700     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.046601     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Nature (London) 177, 27 (1956).
2. M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2901 (1990);
3. Th. Martin and R. Landauer, Phys. Rev. B 45, 1742 (1992).
4. M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B 46, 12 485 (1992).
5. For a review, see Ya. M. Blanter and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rep. 336, 1 (2000).
6. M. Henny, Science 284, 296 (1999);
7. W. D. Oliver, Science 284, 299 (1999);
8. S. Oberholzer, Physica (Amsterdam) 6E, 314 (2000).
9. X. Jehl, Nature (London) 405, 50 (2000);
10. A. A. Kozhevnikov, R. J. Schoelkopf, and D. E. Prober, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3398 (2000).
11. W. Belzig and Y. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 067006 (2001).
12. M. P. Anantram and S. Datta, Phys. Rev. B 53, 16 390 (1996).
13. J. Torrés and Th. Martin, Eur. Phys. J. B 12, 319 (1999).
14. T. Gramespacher and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B 61, 8125 (2000).
15. K. E. Nagaev and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B 63, 081301 (2001).
16. J. Melsen, Europhys. Lett. 35, 7 (1996);
17. D. Taras-Semchuk and A. Altland, Phys. Rev. B 64, 014512 (2001).
18. C. W. J. Beenakker, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 731 (1997).
19. Yu. V. Nazarov in Quantum Dynamics of Submicron Structures, H. A. Cerdeira, NATO ASI Ser. E, Vol. 291 (Kluwer, Dordrecht,1995), p. 687.
20. P. W. Brouwer and C. W. J. Beenakker, J. Math. Phys. 37, 4904 (1997).
21. A. A. Clerk, P. W. Brouwer, and V. Ambegaokar, Phys. Rev. B 62, 10 226 (2000).
22. We note that this result coincides with what is found for the single mode model of Ref.
23. The same result was obtained in Ref.
24. J. Böerlin, W. Belzig, and C. Bruder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 197001 (2002).