Twenty-first century doctoral education: Online with a focus on nursing education

Nursing Education Perspectives

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 332-336

  Leners, Debra Woodard ^a   Wilson, Vicki W ^a   Sitzman, Kathleen L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO   (United States)

^b WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Best practice nursing education; Doctoral nursing education; Doctoral program evaluation; Internet based nursing education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; QUALITY CONTROL; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

BENCHMARKING; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, DISTANCE; EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; HUMANS; INTERNET; PROGRAM EVALUATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 37649024056     PISSN: 15365026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Billings, D., Connors, H., & Skiba, D. (2001). Benchmarking best practices in web-based nursing courses. Advances in Nursing Science 23(3), 41-52.
2. Hinshaw, A. S. (2001). A continuing challenge: The shortage of educationally prepared nursing faculty. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 6(1), Manuscript 3. [Online]. Available: http://nursingworld.org/ MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/ Volume62001/Number I January2001/ShortageofEducationalFaculty.aspx.
3. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (2003, May). Faculty shortages in baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs: Scope of the problem and strategies for expanding the supply. Washington, DC: Author. [Online]. Available: www.aacn.nche.edu/Publications/pdf/TFFFWP.pdf.
4. Berlin, L. E., & Sechrist, K.R. (2002). The shortage of doctorally prepared nursing faculty: A dire situation. Nursing Outlook, 50, 50-56.
5. Glover, L. (2004, August 13). Nursing enrollments up but shortage of qualified instructors locally, nationwide plagues schools. Pittsburgh Business Times.
6. National League for Nursing. (2003). Nurse educators 2002: Report of the faculty census survey of RN and graduate programs. New York: Author.
7. National League for Nursing. (2004). Report of the national study of faculty role satisfaction. New York: Author.
8. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2000). Institutions offering doctoral programs in nursing and degrees conferred. Washington, DC: Author.
9. Edwardson, S. (2004). Matching standards and needs in doctoral education in nursing. Journal of Professional Nursing, 20(1), 40-46.
10. Baird, L. (Ed.). (1993). New directions for institutional research: Increasing graduate student retention and degree attainment, No. 80. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2002). The best scientists do not the best teachers make [Editorial]. Nursing and Health Care Perspectives, 22(2), 61.
12. University of Northern Colorado. (2007). Mission statement. [Online]. Available: www.unco.edu/pres/mission/html.
13. Higher Learning Commission. (2003). Handbook of accreditation (3rd ed.). Chicago: Author.
14. North Central Association Commission on Institutions of Higher Education. (2000). Best practices for electronically offered degree and certificate programs. Chicago: Author.
15. Institute for Higher Education Policy. (1999). What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: Author.
16. Institute for Higher Education Policy. (2000). Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in Internet-based distance education. Washington, DC: Author. [Online]. Available: www.ihep.com/Pubs/PDF/Quality.pdf.
17. Twomey, A. (2004). Web-based teaching in nursing: Lessons from the literature. Nurse Education Today, 24, 452-458.
18. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2001). Indicators of quality in research-focused doctoral programs in nursing [Position Statement]. Washington, DC: Author. [Online]. Available: www.aacn.nche.edu/ Publications/positions/qualityindicators.htm).
19. Link, D. (2003). Interdisciplinary education: Breaking out of the silos. In M. H. Oermann, & K. T. Heinrich (Eds.), Annual review of nursing education, Vol. I. New York: Springer Publishing.