The perception of children's computer-imaged facial profiles by patients, mothers and clinicians

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 77, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1034-1039

  Miner, Robert M ^a   Anderson, Nina K ^a   Evans, Carla A ^b   Giddon, Donald B ^a,c  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Children; Computer imaging; Perception; Profiles

Indexed keywords

EID: 37649016424     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/080306-314.1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Giddon DB. Mental-dental interface: window to the psyche and soma. Perspect Biol Med. 1999;43(1):84-97.
2. Giddon DB. Orthodontic applications of psychological and perceptual studies of facial esthetics. Semin Orthod. 1995;1(2):82-93.
3. Prahl-Anderson B, Boersma H, van der Linden FPGM, Moore AW. Perceptions of dentofacial morphology by lay-persons, general dentists, and orthodontists. J Am Dent Assoc. 1979;98:209-212.
4. Anderson NK, Evans CA, Giddon DB. Comparison of perceptions of computer-animated left- and right-facing profiles. J Prosthodont. 1999;8(2):72-79.
5. Arpino V, Giddon DB, BeGole EA, Evans CA. Presurgical profile preference of patients and clinicians. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:631-637.
6. Hier LA, Evans CA, BeGole EA, Giddon DB. Comparison of preferences in lip position using computer animated imaging. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:231-238.
7. Kitay D, BeGole EA, Evans CA, Giddon DB. Computer animated comparison of self perception with actual profiles of orthodontic and nonorthodontic subjects. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1999;14:125-134.
8. McKoy J, Evans CA, Viana G, Anderson NK, Giddon DB. Facial profile preferences of black women before and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129(1):17-23.
9. Mejia-Maidel M, Evans CA, Viana G, Anderson NK, Giddon DB. Preferences for Mexican facial profiles between Mexican Americans and Caucasians. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:763-768.
10. Orsini MG, Huang GJ, Kiyak HA, et al. Methods to evaluate profile preferences for the anteroposterior position of the mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130:283-291.
11. Park YS, Evans CA, Viana G, Anderson NK, Giddon DB. Profile preferences of Korean American orthodontic patients and orthodontists. World J Orthod. 2006;7:286-292.
12. Burcal RG, Laskin DM, Sperry TP. Recognition of profile change after simulated orthognathic surgery. J Maxillofac Surg. 1987;45:666-670.
13. Hershon LE, Giddon DB. Determinants of facial profile self-perception. Am J Orthod. 1980;78:279-295.
14. Kiyak HA, Zeitler DL. Self-assessment of profile and body image among orthognathic surgery patients before and two years after surgery. J Maxillofac Surg. 1988;46:365-371.
15. Alley TR, Hildebrandt KA. Determinants and consequences of facial aesthetics. In: Alley TR, ed. Social and Applied Aspects of Perceiving Faces. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988:101-140.
16. Giddon DB, Sconzo R, Kinchen JA, Evans CA. Quantitative comparison of computerized discrete and animated profile preferences. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:419-426.
17. Liu N, Anderson NK, Giddon DB. Influence of context and image size on profile self-perception. J Dent Res. 2002;81:3802.
18. Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the Head and Face. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1994.
19. Giddon DB, Evans CA, Rains CE, Clemens IK. Influence of magnitude of horizontal and vertical distortion on preference for morphed faces. Percept Mot Skills. 1997;85:1303-1313.
20. Reluga KC, Anderson NK, Giddon DB. Gender differences in computer-animated profile self-perception. J Dent Res. 2002;81:0153.
21. Ben-Tovim DI, Crisp AH. The reliability of estimates of body width and their relationship to current measured body size among anorexic and normal subjects. Psychol Med. 1984;14:843-846.
22. Baldwin DC. Appearance and aesthetics in oral health. Comm Dent Oral Epidem. 1980;9:244-256.
23. Chew MT, Aw AK. Appropriateness of orthodontic referrals: self-perceived and normative treatment needs of patients referred for orthodontic consultation. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002;30:449-454.
24. Hamdan AM. The relationship between patient, parent and clinician perceived need and normative orthodontic treatment need. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26:265-271.
25. Lewit DW, Virolainen K. Conformity and independence in adolescents' motivation for orthodontic treatment. Child Dev. 1968;39:1188-1200.
26. Phillips C, Trentini CJ, Douvartzidis N. The effect of treatment on facial attractiveness. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50:590-594.
27. Stenvik A, Espeland L, Linge BO, Linge L. Lay attitudes to dental appearance and need for orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1997;19:271-277.