Influence of magnitude of horizontal and vertical deformation on preference for morphed faces

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 85, Issue 3 PART II, 1997, Pages 1303-1313

  Giddon, Donald B ^a,d   Rains, Caroline E ^b   Evans, Carla A ^a   Clemens, Ian K ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b Harvard School of Dental Medicine Oral and Developmental Biology   (United States)

^c Regent College   (Canada)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DECISION MAKING; ESTHETICS; FACE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ESTHETICS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; SOFTWARE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0031296829     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1997.85.3f.1303     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ALLEY, T. R. (1988) Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. ANGLE, E. H. (1907) Malocclusion of the teeth. (7 ed.) Philadelphia, PA: SS White Dental Mfg. Co.
3. ARPINO, V. J. (1996) An assessment of facial profile preference of surgical patients using video imaging. (No. 1379061) Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Company [M.S. thesis, Univer. of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL]
4. BACKSTROM, M. J., & ASHMORE, R. D. (1990) The multiplicity of physical attractiveness: categories and dimensions underlying college students' everyday language of beauty. Eastern Psychological Association, 1990 Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA. [Abstract]
5. BELL, R., KIYAK, H. A., JOONDEPH, D. R., MCNEILL, R. W., & WALLEN, T. R. (1985) Perceptions of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. American Journal of Orthodontics, 88, 323-332.
6. BERGEMANN, K., & ASHMORE, R. D. (1990) Physical unattractiveness as a psychological multiplicity: categories and dimensions underlying college students' everyday language of ugliness. Eastern Psychological Association, 1990 Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA. [Abstract]
7. BURCAL, R. G., LASKIN, D. M., & SPERRY, T. P. (1987) Recognition of profile change after simulated orthognathic surgery. Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery, 45, 666-670.
8. GIDDON, D. B. (1995) Orthodontic applications of psychological and perceptual studies of facial esthetics. Seminars in Orthodontics, 1, 82-93.
9. GIDDON, D. B., BERNIER, D. L., KINCHEN, J. A., & EVANS, C. A. (1995) Comparisons of computer-animated programs for quantifying facial profile preferences. Journal of Dental Research, 74, 140. [Abstract]
10. GIDDON, D. B., BERNIER, D. L., KINCHEN, J. A., & EVANS, C. A. (1996) Comparison of two computer-animated imaging programs for quantifying facial profile preference. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82, 1251-1264.
11. GIDDON, D. B., MOSIER, M., COLTON, T., & BULMAN, J. S. (1976) Quantitative relationship between perceived and objective need for health care: dentistry as a model system. Public Health Reports, 91, 508-513.
12. GIDDON, D. B., SCONZO, R., KINCHEN, J. A., & EVANS, C. A. (1994) Psychophysical comparison of computerized discrete and animated profile preferences. Journal of Dental Research, 73, 368. [Abstract]
13. GIDDON, D. B., SCONZO, R., KINCHEN, J. A., & EVANS, C. A. (1996) Quantitative comparison of computerized discrete and animated profile preferences. Angle Orthodontist, 66, 419-426.
14. GRUBB, J. E., SMITH, T., & SINCLAIR, P. (1996) Clinical and scientific applications/advances in video imaging. Angle Orthodontist, 66, 407-416.
15. HAXTON, J. M. (1984) Quantitative measurement of toleration of deviations of facial appearance. (Unpublished postdoctoral thesis, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA)
16. HAXTON, J. M., & GIDDON, D. B. (1985) Quantitation of tolerance for cranio-facial deviation. Journal of Dental Research, 64, 292.
17. HERSHON, L. E., & GIDDON, D. B. (1980) Determinants of facial profile self-perception. American Journal of Orthodontics, 78, 279-295.
18. KIYAK, H. A., & ZEITLER, D. L. (1988) Self-assessment of profile and body image among orthognathic surgery patients before and two years after surgery. Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery, 46, 365-371.
19. MATHER, G. (1980) The movement aftereffect and a distribution-shift model for coding the direction of visual movement. Perception, 9, 379-382.
20. MAXWELL, R., & KIYAK, H. A. (1991) Dentofacial appearance: a comparison of patient self-assessment techniques. The International Journal of Adult Orthognathics ana Orthognathic Surgery, 6, 123-131.
21. PHILLIPS, C., HILL, B. J., & CANNAC, C. (1995) The influence of video imaging on patients' perceptions and expectation. Angle Orthodontist, 65, 263-270.
22. RICHMOND, S., O'BRIEN, K., BUCHANAN, I., & BURDEN, D. (1992) An introduction to occlusal indices. Yorkshire, Eng.: ORTHO-CARE (UK) Limited.
23. TODD, J. T. (1995) The visual perception of three-dimensional structure from motion. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Pp. 201-226.