Self-generated learning in people with multiple sclerosis: An extension of Chiaravalloti and DeLuca (2002)

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 63-69

  Basso, Michael R ^a   Ghormley, Courtney ^b   Lowery, Natasha ^a   Combs, Dennis ^a   Bornstein, Robert A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TULSA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITIVE THERAPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY DISORDER; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; VERBAL MEMORY;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY DISORDERS; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 37649015040     PISSN: 13803395     EISSN: 1744411X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13803390601186957     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Basso, M. R., Schefft, B. K., & Hoffmann, R. G. (1994). Mood moderating effects of affect intensity on cognition: Sometimes euphoria is not beneficial and dysphoria is not detrimental. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 363-368.
2. Begg, I., Snider, A., Finola, F., & Goddard, R. (1989). The generation effect is no artifact: Generating makes words distinctive. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 977-989.
3. Bobholz, J. A., & Rao, S. M. (2003). Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: A review of recent developments. Current Opinion in Neurology, 16, 283-288.
4. Burns, D. J. (1992). The consequences of generation. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 615-633.
5. Chiaravalloti, N. D., & DeLuca, J. (2002). Self-generation as a means of maximizing learning in multiple sclerosis: An application of the generation effect. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 1070-1079.
6. Chiaravalloti, N. D., DeLuca, J., Moore, N. B., & Ricker, J. H. (2005). Treating learning impairments improves memory performance in multiple sclerosis: A randomized clinical trial. Multiple Sclerosis, 11, 58-68.
7. Chiaravalloti, N. D., Demaree, H., Gaudino, E. A., & DeLuca, J. (2003). Can the repetition effect maximize learning in multiple sclerosis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 17, 58-68.
8. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.
9. Dick, M. B., Kean, M. L., & Sands, D. (1989). Memory for internally generated words in Alzheimer-type dementia: Breakdown in encoding and semantic memory. Brain and Cognition, 9, 88-108.
10. Lipinska, B., Backman, L., Mantyla, T., & Viitanen, M. (1994). Effectiveness of self-generated cues in early Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16, 809-819.
11. Martin, R., Hohlfeld, R., & McFarland, H. F. (1996). Multiple sclerosis. In T. Brandt, L. R. Caplan, J. Dichgans, H. C. Diener, & C. Kennard (Eds.), Neurological disorders: Course and treatment (pp. 483-506). New York: Academic Press.
12. Mitchell, D. B., Hunt, R. R., & Schmitt, F. A. (1986). The generation effect and reality monitoring: Evidence from dementia and normal aging. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 79-84.
13. Multhaup, K. S., & Balota, D. A. (1997). Generation effects and source memory in healthy older adults and in adults with dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neuropsychology, 11, 382-391.
14. Peynircioglu, Z. (1989). The generation effect with pictures and nonsense figures. Acta Psychologica, 70, 153-160.
15. Poser, C. M., Paty, D. W., Scheinberg, L., McDonald, W. I., Davis, F. A., Ebers, G. C., et al. (1983). New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols. Annals of Neurology, 13, 227-231.
16. Rao, S. M., Leo, G. J., Bernardin, L., & Unverzagt, F. (1991). Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology, 41, 685-691.
17. Robertson, I. H., & Murre, J. M. J. (1999). Rehabilitation of brain damage: Brain plasticity and principles of guided recovery. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 544-575.
18. Slamecka, N. J., & Fevreiski, J. (1983). The generation effect when generation fails. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 153-163.
19. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604.
20. Solari, A., Motta, A., Mendozzi, L., Pucci, E., Forni, M., Mancardi, G., Pozzilli, C., & CRIMS Trial. (2004). Computer-aided retraining of memory and attention in people with multiple sclerosis: A randomized double-blind controlled trial. Journal of Neurological Science, 222, 99-104.
21. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Memory Scale-III. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
22. Wilson, B. A. (1992). Rehabilitation and memory disorders. In L. Squire & N. Butters (Eds.), Neuropsychology of memory (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
23. Wilson, B. A. (2000). Compensating for cognitive deficits following brain injury. Neuropsychology Review, 10, 233-243.