Chemosensory performance of molecularly imprinted fluorescent conjugated polymer materials

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 129, Issue 51, 2007, Pages 15911-15918

  Li, Jiahui ^a   Kendig, Claire E ^a   Nesterov, Evgueni E ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CROSSLINKING; FLUORESCENCE; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; QUANTUM CHEMISTRY; SENSORS;

CHEMOSENSORY PERFORMANCE; FLUORESCENT CONJUGATED POLYMERS; NITROAROMATIC COMPOUNDS;

CONJUGATED POLYMERS;

AROMATIC NITRO COMPOUND; POLYMER; TRINITROTOLUENE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BINDING; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMOSENSITIZATION; CONJUGATION; DEVICE; FLUORESCENCE; MOLECULAR IMPRINTING; POLYMER PRODUCTION; QUANTUM YIELD; RECOGNITION; SENSOR; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYNTHESIS; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 37549005617     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja0748027     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. (a) Callan, J. F.; de Silva, A. P.; Magri, D. C. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 8551-8588 and references therein,
2. (b) Special issue on "Luminescent Sensors" Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 205, 1-232.
3. (a) McQuade, D. T.; Pullen, A. E.; Swager, T. M. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2537-2574.
4. (b) Thomas, S. W., III; Joly, G. D.; Swager, T. M. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 1339-1386.
5. (c) Yang, C. J.; Pinto, M.; Schanze, K.; Tan, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2572-2576.
6. (d) Liu, B.; Bazan, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1188-1196.
7. (a) Swager, T. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 201-207.
8. (b) Chen, L.; McBranch, D. W.; Wang, H.-L.; Helgeson, R.; Wudl, F.; Whitten, D. G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 12287-12292.
9. Zhou, Q.; Swager, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 12593-12602.
10. Montroll, E. W. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1969, 26 Suppl., 6-10.
11. (a) Yang, J.-S.; Swager, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11864-11873.
12. (b) Yang, J.-S.; Swager, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5321-5322.
13. (c) Sohn, H.; Sailor, M. J.; Magde, D.; Trogler, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3821-3830.
14. (d) Liu, Y.; Mills, R. C.; Boncella, J. M.; Schanze, K. S. Langmuir 2001, 17, 7452-7455.
15. Molecularly Imprinted Polymers: Man-Made Mimics of Antibodies and Their Applications in Analytical Chemistry; Sellegren, B., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2001;
16. (b) Molecular and Ionic Recognition with Imprinted Polymers; Bartsch, R. A., Maeda, M., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series 703; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1998.
17. (c) Zimmerman, S. C.; Lemcoff, N. G. Chem. Commun. 2004, 5-14.
18. (d) Wei, S.; Jakusch, M.; Mizaikoff, B. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 578, 50-58.
19. Wulff, C.; Sarhan, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1972, 11, 341.
20. Andersson, L.; Sellergren, B.; Mosbach, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 5211-5214.
21. (a) Sibrian-Vazquez, M.; Spivak, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7827-7833.
22. (b) Spivak, D. A.; Campbell, J. Analyst 2001, 126, 793-797.
23. As an example of highly selective molecular imprinting of a nonfunctionalized template, imprinting of hexachlorobenzene was recently reported: Das, K.; Penelle, J.; Rotello, V. M. Langmuir 2003, 19, 3921-3925.
24. (a) Dickert, F. L.; Forth, P.; Lieberzeit, P.; Tortschanoff, M. Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem. 1998, 360, 759-762.
25. (b) Hillberg, A. L.; Brain, K. R.; Allender, C. J. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2005, 57, 1875-1889.
26. (c) Haupt, K. Chem. Commun. 2003, 171-178.
27. Some selected examples: (a) Turkewitsch, P.; Wandelt, B.; Darling, G. D.; Powell, W. S. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 2025-2030.
28. (b) Manesiotis, P.; Hall, A. J.; Emgenbroich, M.; Quaglia, M.; De Lorenzi, E.; Sellergren, B. Chem. Commun. 2004, 2278-2279.
29. (c) Takeuchi, T.; Mukawa, T.; Matsui, J.; Higashi, M.; Shimizu, K. D. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 3869-3874.
30. (d) Rathbone, D. L.; Bains, A. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2005, 20, 1438-1442.
31. (e) Henry, O. Y. F.; Cullen, D. C.; Piletsky, S. A. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2005, 382, 947-956.
32. (f) Matsui, J.; Higashi, M.; Takeuchi, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5218-5219.
33. Bidan, G.; Divisia-Blohorn, B.; Lapkowski, M.; Kern, J.-M.; Sauvage, J.-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5986-5994.
34. Some recent references: (a) Namvar, A.; Warriner, K. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 22, 2018-2024.
35. (b) Ramanavičius, A.; Ramanavičiene, A.; Malinauskas, A. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 51, 6025-6037.
36. (c) Shiigi, H.; Kijima, D.; Ikenaga, Y.; Hori, K.; Fukazawa, S.; Nagaoka, T. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005, 152, H129-H134.
37. (d) Ho, K.-C.; Yeh, W.-M.; Tung, T.-S.; Liao, J.-Y. Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 542, 90-96.
38. (e) Panasyuk, T. L.; Mirsky, V. M.; Piletsky, S. A.; Wolfbeis, O. S. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 4609-4613.
39. Other approaches to TNT detection using molecularly imprinted materials: (a) Gao, D.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, M.; Xie, C.; Guan, G.; Wang, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7859-7866.
40. (b) Bunte, G.; Hürttlen, J.; Pontius, H.; Hartlieb, K.; Krause, H. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 591, 49-56.
41. (c) Walker, N. R.; Linman, M. J.; Timmers, M. M.; Dean, S. L.; Burkett, C. M.; Lloyd, J. A.; Keelor, J. D.; Baughman, B. M.; Edmiston, P. L. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 593, 82-91.
42. Moratti, S. C. In Handbook of Conducting Polymers, 2nd ed.; Skotheim, T. A., Elsenbaumer, R. L., Reynolds, J. R., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1998; pp 343-361.
43. (a) Rose, A.; Zhu, Z.; Madigan, C. F.; Swager, T. M.; Bulović, V. Nature 2005, 434, 876-879.
44. (b) Kim, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Swager, T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 452-453.
45. (c) Chang, C.-P.; Chao, C.-Y.; Huang, J. H.; Li, A.-K.; Hsu, C.-S.; Lin, M.-S.; Hsieh, B. R.; Su, A.-C. Synth. Met. 2004, 144, 297-301.
46. (a) Hittinger, E.; Kokil, A.; Weder, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1808-1811.
47. (b) Weder, C. Chem. Commun. 2005, 5378-5389.
48. Terao, J.; Tang, A.; Michels, J. J.; Krivokapic, A.; Anderson, H. L. Chem. Commun. 2004, 56-57.
49. Pereira, S.; Srebnik, M. Organometallics 1995, 14, 3127-3128.
50. (a) Ki, C. D.; Oh, C.; Oh, S.-G.; Chang, J. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14838-14839.
51. (b) Dirion, B.; Lanza, F.; Sellergren, B.; Chassaing, C.; Venn, R.; Berggren, C. Chromatographia 2002, 56, 237-241.
52. Molecules 1 and 2a show the opposite electrostatic potential distribution. Although this may result in differences in the template/analyte electrostatic interactions with the imprinted cavity, our experimental results demonstrated that the matching shape/size is a dominant factor.
53. See Supporting Information for experimental details, procedures, and characterizations.
54. Bartlett, P. A.; Johnson, W. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1970, 4459-4462.
55. Alternatively, the decrease in conjugation length may be due to cross-conjugation in meta-substituted cross-linker units, which disrupts the π-electron conjugation in the ground state (but enhances the conjugation in the excited state; see: Thomson, A. L.; Gaab, K. M.; Xu, J.; Bardeen, C. J.; Martinez, T. J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 671-682). This effect requires further studies which will be reported elsewhere.
56. Turro N. J. Modern Molecular Photochemistry; University Science Books: Mill Valley, CA, 1991.
57. Masoumi, Z.; Stoeva, V.; Yekta, A.; Pang, Z.; Manners, I.; Winnik, M. A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 261, 551-557.
58. SV in eq 1 are different and are expressed in different units.
59. Lakowicz, J. R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 3rd ed.; Springer: New York, 2006.
60. Diffusion-controlled analyte penetration from the surface into the bulk of the solid material will depend on the solubility of the analyte in the polymer and may also affect the quenching efficiency, especially at longer exposure times. Still, considering the relative similarity between the polymers under study, it is expected to provide only a minor contribution.
61. Rehm, D.; Weller, A. Isr. J. Chem. 1970, 8, 259-271.
62. 3 compared to TNT) higher vapor pressure. In addition, CA's shape and size are somewhat close to those of TNT which allows this compound to enter some of the more easily accessible imprinted cavities.